How have mandated nurse staffing ratios affected hospitals? Perspectives from California hospital leaders.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing, USA.
Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives (Impact Factor: 0.73). 54(5):321-33; discussion 334-5.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In 1999, California became the first state to pass legislation mandating minimum nurse-to-patient ratios. Regulations detailing specific ratios by type of hospital unit were released in 2002, with phased-in implementation beginning in 2004 and completed in 2008. These ratios were implemented at a time of severe registered nurse (RN) shortage in the state and a worsening financial position for many hospitals. This article presents an analysis of qualitative data from interviews with healthcare leaders about the impact of nurse staffing ratios. Twenty hospitals (including public, not-for-profit, and for-profit institutions) representing major geographic regions of California were approached. Twelve agreed to participate; semistructured in-person and telephone interviews were conducted with 23 hospital leaders. Several key themes emerged from the analysis. Most hospitals found it difficult and expensive to find more RNs to hire to meet the ratios. Meeting the staffing requirements on all units, at all times, was challenging and had negative impacts, such as a backlog of patients in the emergency department and a decrease of other ancillary staff. Hospital leaders do not believe that ratios have had an impact on patient quality of care. Findings related to nurse satisfaction were mixed. Increased RN staffing improved satisfaction with patient workload, but dissatisfaction with issues of decision-making control (e.g., decisions on when best to take a meal break) were taken out of the nurse's hands to meet ratio requirements. Further research should continue to monitor patient outcomes as other states consider similar ratio regulations. Results of this study will be useful to healthcare managers searching for ways to reduce unnecessary administrative costs while continuing to maintain the level of administrative activities required for the provision of safe, effective, high-quality care.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this study were to identify the attitudes and perceptions of nurses towards family-paid caregivers, to examine the roles of caregivers in hospital bedside nursing care and to describe the supervision of family-paid caregivers by nurses. The inadequacy of nurse staffing and the Chinese tradition emphasising family responsibility have established family-paid caregivers as an important workforce for inpatient bedside nursing care in China. This was a descriptive study combining qualitative interviews with a quantitative cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Six nurses were interviewed and 209 family-paid caregivers were surveyed. According to the respondents, patients relied on the caregivers to receive assistance and care during hospitalization and family-paid caregivers were involved in most of the bedside nursing care. The heavy workload of nurses and staffing inadequacy have led to a severe need for caregivers to provide bedside nursing care within hospitals in China. The roles of family-paid caregivers need to be defined and closely monitored. Proper management of the caregivers should be strengthened and the hospital nursing workforce encouraged to take over bedside nursing care as essential strategies for improving nursing care quality and the patients' satisfaction with the hospitals.
    Journal of Nursing Management 11/2013; 21(8):1026-33. DOI:10.1111/jonm.12017 · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PurposeTo explore satisfaction and burnout of nurses working in neurology wards in Shanghai, China.DesignA descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire survey.Methods Three hundred and eighty-seven nurses from 23 neurology wards in 21 tertiary general hospitals were recruited using cluster sampling. The valid response rate was 94.83%.FindingsNurse satisfaction with the salary/wages, the job and the nurse staffing level were 21.79%, 37.33%, and 40.87%. A high nurse burnout rate was found as: emotional exhaustion (EE) ≥ 27 (89.92%); depersonalization (DP) ≥ 10 (92.64%); and reduced personal accomplishment (PA)≤ 33 (79.29%).Conclusions Most nurses in the neurology wards were dissatisfied and had high levels of burnout. Experienced, intermediate and senior nurses were at the highest risk for job turnover.Clinical RelevanceNurse administrators should take effective measures to increase nurse satisfaction and decrease burnout to retain experienced nurses and keep the stability of nursing workforce.
    08/2014; DOI:10.1002/rnj.174
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Historically, unions and professional associations such as the American Nurses Association have been adversaries in the fight to represent the best interests of the nursing profession. We reviewed the literature on the evolution of nursing unions, nursing's historical unease about unions, the Magnet designation in nursing, the tensions between the unions and Magnet, the core values and commonalities they share, and the obligations of nursing as a profession. Refocusing on the advancement of our profession provides a positive pathway in which the collective efforts of nursing unions and professional initiatives such as the Magnet designation converge during these turbulent times for our profession. The single, central organizing idea of nursing-where nursing unions and Magnet converge-is the pivotal role of nurses in delivering high-quality patient care. The often-maligned dialectic between unions and Magnet has advanced and not hindered the nursing profession.
    Nursing Forum 01/2014; DOI:10.1111/nuf.12074

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014