Neuroscience in the era of functional genomics and systems biology

Program in Neurogenetics and Neurobehavioural Genetics, Department of Neurology and Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 42.35). 10/2009; 461(7266):908-15. DOI: 10.1038/nature08537
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Advances in genetics and genomics have fuelled a revolution in discovery-based, or hypothesis-generating, research that provides a powerful complement to the more directly hypothesis-driven molecular, cellular and systems neuroscience. Genetic and functional genomic studies have already yielded important insights into neuronal diversity and function, as well as disease. One of the most exciting and challenging frontiers in neuroscience involves harnessing the power of large-scale genetic, genomic and phenotypic data sets, and the development of tools for data integration and mining. Methods for network analysis and systems biology offer the promise of integrating these multiple levels of data, connecting molecular pathways to nervous system function.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent advances in genetics are having a major impact on the way in which we conceptualize psychiatric disorders. We shall very shortly be able to obtain, at moderate cost, our own personalized genome. Will this information be used to develop more rational systems of diagnostic classification, and more effective and individually tailored treatments, for patients with psychiatric disorders?Knowledge is moving fast, and the ability simply to label all 6 billion nucleotide pairs that together make up the 46 chromosomes within our genome is no longer novel. We need to understand how the systems controlling gene expression work, and how these could be influenced by exposure to different environments.There are pitfalls awaiting those who expect easy or simple answers. Many areas of psychiatric genetic research are hotly contested, and claims that grabbed the headlines yesterday may reflect publication bias and excessively optimistic interpretation of ambiguous data. Nonetheless, advances in all areas, from the lab bench to the bedside make these exciting times.
    Child Psychology and Psychiatry: Frameworks for Practice, Second Edition, 01/2011: pages 23 - 30; , ISBN: 9781119993971
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, affecting millions of aging people worldwide with no known cure. Pathological analyses have identified extracellular β-amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau as core features, but the key causal biochemical pathways remain elusive. In fact, functional genomic analyses suggest a number of other cellular changes occurring early in the disease, including synaptic and bio-energetic dysfunction, as well as a role for neuron–glia interactions. Given the complexity of AD and the limitations of our current knowledge, the field of AD research would benefit from taking hypothesis-independent approaches that allow one to view the data in a systems biology framework. This paradigm shift in AD transcriptional research would permit consolidation of the large body of often-conflicting transcriptional, proteomic, and other screening results into testable theories of AD progression. In this chapter, we will first review transcriptional studies of AD that use postmortem human brain, animal model systems, and peripheral human tissue, addressing the biological pathways that these studies suggest degrade with AD progression. Next, we will discuss recent studies with more multifaceted designs, and how results from such studies lend support to some of these theories. Finally, we will suggest how using a more systems-level approach to the study of AD could help scientists further clarify what goes wrong in the brain at various stages of AD progression and be beneficial for the development of more targeted therapies.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Briefly introduced the status and related theories foundation of Theoretical Informatics (TI) and Systems Biology (SB). These two disciplines were compared and analyzed in the three aspects of the background, epistemological ap-proach, informational energy of open systems, thus demonstrating the similar attributes or characteristics of the two disci-plines, and indirectly discoursing the necessity, the rationality, the feasibility and the vital significance of the establishment and researches for TI. The paper also explores how to draw, reference SB model of development to promote the prosperity and great development of TI.
Show more


Available from