Instructions for use
TitleDisinfection of Water for Aquaculture
Author(s) Kasai, Hisae; Yoshimizu, Mamoru; Ezura, Yoshio
Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/38580
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP
Proceedings of International Commemorative Symposium 70111 Anniversary of The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science,
F i . ~ h . Sci. 2002; 68 Supplement I: 821'824. October 1'5, 2001. Yokohama. Japan
DISINFECTION OF WATER FOR AQUACULTURE
HISAE KASAl,1 MAMORU YOSHIMIZU1 AND YOSHIO EZURA1
Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Division of Marine Bioscience, Graduate School of Fisheries
Science, Hokkaido University, Minato 3-1-1, Hakodate, Hokkaido 041-8611, Japan.
SUMMARY: Disinfection of water for aquaculture is critical for preventing the introduction and spread of
infectious disease. A pathogen-free water source is essential for success in aquaculture. Typical
treatment systems make use of high efficiency sand filters to clarify the water before treatment with
ultraviolet (UV) light or ozonization. Fish pathogens are divided into two groups based on their
sensitivity to UV and total residual oxidants (TROs) produced by ozonization of seawater. Hypochlorite
produced by electrolysis of seawater (salt water) showed bactericidal and viricidal effects. This method
can easily treat large volumes of water, and is suitable for disinfecting wastewater before discharging.
KEY WORDS: disinfection, aquaculture, fish pathogen, UV, ozone, oxidant, electrolization
Water supplies for seed production and aquaculture
often provide an efficient means for the introduction
and spread of infectious diseases. A pathogen-free
water source is essential for success in aquaculture.
Surface waters commonly used in aquaculture come
from coastal waters or rivers and may contain some
fish pathogens and such open water supplies should
not be used without treatment. Disinfection of
wastewater before discharging is necessary to avoid
the pathogen contamination in the environment. In
this study, we examine the cidal effect of ultraviolet
(UV), oxidant produced by ozonization of seawater
and hypochlorite produced by electrolization of
seawater. Additionally the disinfectant effects of the
three methods for a hatchery water supply and
4 _____ Standard type U.V. [amp
10) HIRRV. LCOV, V. anguillarum
l ~ Q . o l ' n Q r : s : L _____ .
Fungi and Microparasites
Fig. I. U.V. susceptibility offish pathogens.
1 Vlasenko, M. I. (1969) 2 Hoffman, G. 1. (1974)
3 Normandeau, D. A. (1968)
wastewater were compared and the survival rate of
cultured fish that were reared using water treated with
these methods was assessed.
UV susceptibility of fish pathogens and the effects
of UV treatment on hatchery water
The disinfectant effects of UV irradiation were
examined on cell suspensions of 4 species of fish
pathogenic bacteria and Escherichia coli. using a
punched agar medium disk covered with 10 strains of
aquatic fungi and 14 strains of cell free fish
pathogenic viruses. Of the viable bacterial cells of
Gram negative bacteria and Gram positive bacteria.
99.9% or more were killed by UV irradiation at the
dose of 4.0 X 10'> and 2.0 X 10
respectively.4) The hyphae of aquatic fungi showed
relatively lower susceptibility to UV irradiation, levels
that inhibited the growth of hyphae were 1.5 X lOs to
2.5 X lOs 11 W' sec/cm2•S)
three fish herpesviruses and two fish iridovirus were
found to be sensitive to UV irradiation. The dose that
resulted in a 99 % or more infectivity decrease (lD99)
was observed at the dose of 1.0 X 103 to 3.0X 103
J.L W' sec/cm2• Susceptibility of two birnaviruses. a
fish reovirus and a fish nodavirus was found to be low.
ID99 measured 1.5 X lOs to 2.5 X lOs 11 W' sec/cm2
(Fig. 1 ).6)
The infectivity of infectious hematopoietic necrosis
virus (IHNV), in virus-contaminated river water and
pond water. as measured by the molecular filtration
method was 0.56 and 5.6 TClDsoII. respectively. UV
treatment of river water with 104 11 W' sec/cm2 UV
dose prevented an IHN outbreak.7) Furthermore, UV
treatment of the hatchery water supply also decreased
the viable bacterial counts and fungal infection rates
of salmonid eggs.8)
J.L W' sec/cm ,
Six fish rhabdoviruses.
Table 1. Effect oftota! residual oxidants (TROs) concentrations produced by ozonization of seawater on infectivities offISh pathogens
Yellowtail ascites virus (Y A V)
hirame rhabdovirus (iliRRV)
Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV)
Infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV)
Oncorhynchus masou virus (OMV)
Chum salmon virus (CSV)
lAM 1018 0.5
1 Initial viral infectivity (TCIDsolml). 2 Initial viable bacterial number (CFU/ml). 1 Initial viable number.
Disinf ectant effect of oxidant produced by
ozonization of sea water on flSh pathogens
Treatment of natural seawater with ozone produced
oxidant that showed a disinfectant effect. Total
residual oxidant (TROs) produced in seawater were
stable for 1 h or more. Disinfectant effect ofTROs
against flSh pathogenic organisms was observed at a
dose of 0.5 mg/I for 15 to 30 s or 0.1 mg/I for 60 s,
Ozonization Aeration Culture tank
~ 0 . 0 0 3 mg/I
~ 0 . 0 0 3 mg/I I
Fig. 2. Ozonization of water for aquaculture.
and killed more than 99.9 % of bacterial cells of
Vibrio anguillarum, Enterococcus
Aeromonas salmon icida, A. hydrophila and E. coli,
and inactivated 99 % or more of IHNV. hirame
rhabdovirus (HlRRV) and Oncorhynchus masou virus
(OMY). To inactivate or kill more than 99 % of
yellowtail ascites virus (YAV). infectious pancreatic
necrosis virus (lPNV). chum salmon virus (CSV), and
a Scuticociliatida (ciliata). higher doses of 0.5 to 1.0
mg/I for 1 min were required (Table 1).9.10)
TROs showed toxicity for fish. Barfin flounder
Verasper moseri and herring Clupea pa/lasii died after
16 and 2 h exposure to TROs of 0.1 and 0.5 mg//.
respectively. However, Japanese flounder could be
cultured in ozonized seawater after the TRO were
removed by charcoal (Fig.2), resulting in survival
rates similar to fish cultured in UV treated or
non-treated seawater. 11)
Disinfectant effects of electrolyzed salt water on
fish pathogenic bacteria and viruses
The bactericidal and viricidal effects of hypochlorite
produced by electrolysis of salt water were examined
against pathogenic bacteria and viruses of fish.
Table 2. The chlorine concentration produced by electrolysis of salt water and treatment time
required to 'reduce the viability of bacteria and the infectivity of viruses by 99.9 %
Aeromonas salmonicidc ATCC 14174
Yellowtail ascites virus (Y A V)
hirame rhabdovirus (HIRRV)
I Initial viable bacterial number (CFU/m/). 2 Initial viral infectivity (TCIDsolrnl).
Table 3. Effects oru.v. irradiation, ozonization and electrolyzation on the viability of bacteria in hatchery waste-seawater
Flow rate Treatment
1.3 x 10°
l.Ox 1051lW ·sec/cm!
TROs 0.5 mg/t. 1 min
Chlorine 0.6 mg/I, I min
Sodium chloride solutions, ranging from 0.5 to 3 %
were electrolyzed and the concentration of chlorine
produced was measured. Similar concentrations of
chlorine were produced when 1.0 % or h i ~ h e r NaCl
solution and seawater were electrolyzed. t
solution of sodium chloride containing pathogenic
bacteria or virus was electrolyzed and the organisms
were exposed to chlorine. Greater than 99.9 % of V.
anguil/arum and A. salmonicida cells were killed
when the bacteria were exposed to 0.1 mg/I chlorine
for I min. YAY and HIRRV were 99.9 % or greater
inactivated after treatment with 0.45 mg/I chlorine for
1 min (Table 2).13)
The bactericidal and viricidal effects of hypochlorite
produced by electrolysis (3.5 m3 Ih. 0.1 A) were
greater than that of the chemical reagent. The purity of
the sodium chloride used influenced the effects of
production of hypochlorite. Sodium chloride obtained
as a super grade chemical reagent was more effective
than food-grade sodium chloride.
sufficient disinfectant effect was
electrolyzed seawater. a treatment which may have an
application in aquaculture. To use electrolyzed
seawater for culture. the chlorine has to be removed
with charcoal because of its toxicity.
A 3 %
Disinfection of wastewater
The bactericidal effect of hypochlorite produced by a
continuous flow electrolyzer on hatchery wastewater
was investigated. The number of viable bacteria in the
wastewater was reduced more than 99 % when the
water was treated with chlorine at a concentration of
0.6 mg/I for 1 min, and over 99.9 % of the bacteria
cells were killed when treated with 1.28 mg/I for 1 min
(Table 3). In another experiment. 2.0 m3/min of
hatchery wastewater was electrolyzed and the
produced hypochlorite that was mixed with the
remaining, 16.5 m3/min wastewater. Viability of
bacteria was reduced greater than 99 % after treatment
with 0.5 mg/I of chlorite for 1 min. The bactericidal
effect of electrolysis was almost the same as that of
ultraviolet irradiation (1.0 X lOs Jl. W' sec/cm2) or
ozonization (TROs 0.5 mg/I, I min) of seawater.
ElectroIization can be used to treat a large volume of
wastewater compared with the ultraviolet irradiation
or ozonization. 14)
Disifection of water for hatchery water supplies
and survival rate of cultured fish
The effects of the three disinfection methods on
bacteria in the hatchery water supplies are shown in
Table 4. All methods resulted in a reduction of 96.6 to
99.8 % after the treatment. Survival rate of Japanese
flounder Paralichthys olivaceus and barfin flounder
Table 4. Viability of bacteria in hatchery water supply
after treattnent using different disinfection methods
Method Treatment Viable counts
U.V. irradiation 1
1 U.V. dose: 1.0 X lOS Jl W·seclcm2•
2TROs: 0.5 mg//. 3 Chlorine: 0.5 mg/I
1.1 x 10°
Table 5. Survival rate of Japanese flounder cultured in U.V. irradiated. ozonized, electrolyzed or non-treated seaw
Barfin flounderS NT 34.3
I U.V. dose: l.OX 104 JJ. W·seclcm2•
2 Ozonization: 1.0 mg/I TROs for 8.5 min for Japanese flounder. 0.5 mg/I for 5 min for Bartin flounder.
3 Electrolization: 0.5 mf!JI chlorine for 5 min.
4 Tank size: 0.5 1, Number offish: 2000, Duration: 49 days. Feeding: 1 time/day.
S Tank size: 0.5 1, Number of fish: 6500-7100, Duration: 30 days, Feeding: 2 times/day.
cultured in UV irradiated, ozonized and electrolyzed
seawater are sho\\n in Table 5. No statistically
significant differences in survival rates were found
between the three groups of fish cultured with treated
Ozonized and electrolyzed seawater have been
to be effective
equipment used in aquaculturel5•16) and ozonized
seawater is effective for disinfecting fertilized barfin
flounder eggs contaminated with viral nervous
electrolization of seawater seem to be effective
methods for disinfection of the water for fish culture.
Gram negative bacteria and fish rhabdoviruses,
herpesviruses and iridoviruses were killed when UV
irradiated at the dose of 104
inexpensive UV lamps can irradiate at that dosage and
may be suitable for hatcheries or culturing stations
that have problems caused by these microorganisms.
This would be the best method for disinfection of UV
susceptible pathogens. Water contaminated with
reoviruses, fish nodaviruses and aquatic fungi that
showed lower susceptibility should be disinfected
with ozonization, electrolization or high quality UV
Disinfection of wastewater is necessary to prevent
pathogenic contamination of the environments.
Electrolization is easy to scale up and can be used to
treat a large volume of water. thus making it a suitable
method for disinfecting wastewater.
JJ. W·sec/cm2• Standard,
fish bimaviruses, fish
This research was supported in part by Grant in Aid
for Scientific research (B)(2) No.09556041 and (B)(2)
13556027 under the Ministry of Education, Science,
Sports and Technology, Japan.
Vlasenko M.l. Ultraviolet rays as a method for the control
of diseases of fish eggs and young fishes. Problems 0/
Ichthyol. 1969: 9: 697-705.
Hoffinan O.L. Disinfection of contaminated water by
ultraviolet irradiation, wiIh emphasis on whirling disease
(Myxosoma cerebralis) and its effect on fish. Trans. Amer.
Fish. Soc. 1974; 3; 541-550.
3. Noormandeau D.A. Progress report, Project F-I4-R-3,
State of New Hampshire, 1968.
Kimura T, Yoshimizu M, Tajima K, Ezura Y, Sakai M.
Disinfection of hatchery water supply by ultraviolet (U.V.)
irradiation- I . Susceptibility of some fish-paIhogenic
bacterium and microorganisms inhabiting pond waters.
Nippon SZlisan Gakkaishi 1976; 42: 207-211.
Kimura T, Yoshimizu M, Tajima K, Ezura Y. Disinfection
of hatchery water supply by ultraviolet (U.V.) irradiation-
II. U. V. susceptibility of some fish pathogenic fungi. Fish
parholo. 1980; 14: 133-137.
Yoshimizu M, Takizawa H, Kimura T. U.V. susceptibility
of some fish pathogenic viruses. Fish pathol. 1986; 21:
Yoshimizu M, Sami M, Kohara M, Yamazaki T and
Kimura T. Detection of IHNV in hatchery water by
molecular filtration method and effectiveness of U.V.
irradiation on IHNV infectivity. Nippon SZlisan Gakkaishi
1991; 57: 555-560.
Kimura T, Yoshimizu M, Atoda M. Disinfection of
hatchery water supply by ultraviolet (U.v.) irradiation-ill.
Effect of disinfection of hatchery water supply by
ultraviolet irradiation on hatching rate of salmonid eggs.
Fishpathol. 1980; 14: 139-142.
Yoshimizu M, Hyuga S, Oh M.-J., Ito S, Ezura Y.
Disinfectant effect of oxidant produced by ozonization of
sea water on fish pathogenic viruses, bacteria and ciliata.
In "Diseases in Asian Aquaculture If', Asian Fisheries
Society, Manilla, Phillipines 1995: pp. 203-209.
10. Itoh S, Yoshimizu M, Ezura Y. Disinfectant effects of low
level of total residual oxidants in artificial seawater on fish
pathogenic microorganisms. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi
1997: 63: 97-102.
II. Itoh S. Yoshimizu M. Oh M.-J., Hyuuga S. Watanabe K,
Hayakawa Y, Ezura Y. Effects of ozonized seawater on
bacterial pollution and survival of cultured flounders
SZlisanzoshoku 1996: 44: 457-463.
12. Kasai H, Watanabe K, Yoshimizu M. Disinfectant effects
of hypochlorite produced by batch electrolytic system on
fish pathogenic bacteria and virus. SZlisanzoshoku 200 I;
13. Kasai H, IshikawaA, Hori Y, Watanabe K, Yoshimizu M.
Disinfectant effects of electrolyzed salt water on fish
paIhogenic bacteria and viruses. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi
2000; 66: 1020-1025.
14. Kasai H, Watanabe K, Yoshimizu M. Bactericidal effect of
continuous flow electrolyzer on hatchery waste-seawater.
Nippon SZlisan Gakkaishi 2001; 67: 222-225.
15. Watanabe K, Yoshimizu
equipments for aquaculture and fertilized eggs by
ozonated seawater. Fishparhol. 1998: 33: 145-146.
16. Watanabe K, Yoshimizu
equipment for aquaculture by electrolyzed seawater.
Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 2001; 67: 304-305.
17. Watanabe K. Yoshimizu M. Disinfection of viral
nervous necrosis contaminated fertilized eggs by
ozonated seawater. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 2000; 66:
M. Disinfection of