Conference Paper

Pre-RAKE diversity combination for direct sequence spread spectrum communications systems

Dept. of Electr. Eng., Keio Univ., Yokohama
DOI: 10.1109/ICC.1993.397307 Conference: Communications, 1993. ICC 93. Geneva. Technical Program, Conference Record, IEEE International Conference on, Volume: 1
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT A novel method of multipath diversity signal combination is
proposed for mobile direct sequence spread spectrum (DS-SS)
communications. Multiple transmissions are made for each spread signal.
Each transmission is independently delayed and amplified in the complex
domain according to the delay profile and the estimated path strength of
the channel. This is done to facilitate reception of a signal at the
mobile unit which is already a RAKE combination of the multipath
signals. This method is called a pre-RAKE combination system because the
RAKE combination function is performed pre-transmission. Using this
method the size and complexity of the mobile unit can be kept to a
minimum. The pre-RAKE method retains the advantages of diversity
reception in a multi-path fading environment. An examination of the SNR
for the traditional RAKE and the pre-RAKE systems and computer
simulations show that the performance of the pre-RAKE system is
equivalent to that of the RAKE system

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Similar to linear receive processing we assume for linear transmit processing that the transmitter completely knows the channel impulse responses to the different receivers for linear transmit processing. Contrary to linear receive processing where three basic types, namely matched filter, zero-forcing filter, and Wiener filter, are well researched and understood, for linear transmit processing only the zero-forcing variant has been identified. The prerake concept seems to be a good candidate for the transmit matched filter, since it simply moves the receive channel matched filter to the transmitter. We will show that this intuitive system design for transmit processing is equivalent to matched filtering for receive processing.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: MIMO precoding matches the transmission to channel conditions in order to reduce or eliminate interference at the receiver. In this paper, we are interested in the case where the receiver is also equipped with a linear processor, specifically a ZF filter. We analyze the effect of the ZF receive filter on the performance of a variety of MIMO precoders. It is shown that receive-side ZF equalization can remove the error floors that sometimes appear with regularized zero-forcing precoding and matched-filter precoding.
    2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers; 11/2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A time-reversal (TR)-based transmission using pre-distortion of the transmitted waveforms for intersymbol interference (ISI) alignment is proposed. This scheme differs from the previous TR-based pre-filtering schemes in that it uses distinctively designed pre-distorted waveforms that are based on the transmitted symbol information. In the proposed pre-distortion scheme, the successively received waveforms carrying adjacent transmitted symbols are aligned so that the received symbol power can be intensified. Since the overlapped portions of the successively transmitted waveforms from the proposed pre-distortion scheme are correlated, the power of the overall transmitted signal that is formed by time-shifting and adding the pre-distorted waveforms becomes larger than the sum of the individual pre-distorted waveform powers. In order to adjust the pre-distorted waveform power without measuring the actual power of the overall transmitted signal, an upper bound on the average power of the overall transmitted signal was derived analytically under a low SNR assumption. Simulation showed that the proposed pre-distortion scheme outperformed both conventional TR and the minimum mean square error (MMSE)-based pre-filtering when the ISI was serious with a high transmission rate.
    IEEE Transactions on Communications 02/2015; 63(2):455-465. DOI:10.1109/TCOMM.2014.2371462 · 1.98 Impact Factor