Conference Paper

A unified approach to failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA)

US DOE, Washington, DC
DOI: 10.1109/ARMS.1991.154445 Conference: Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1991. Proceedings., Annual
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT A unified approach in performing a failure mode, effects and
criticality analysis (FMECA) is described. This procedure provides a
technique for performing a thorough analysis that can identify
engineering problem areas and failure modes at specific plant levels,
and contribute to the validity of design review process. It provides
formats for documenting plant/equipment operating characteristics so
that failure modes can readily be identified with a functional
characteristic. In addition, it gives an analytical technique that can
identify necessary corrective action with which top management can make
critical decisions

2 Followers
 · 
135 Views
  • Source
    • "Lambert and Patterson (2002) demonstrate identification of delay scenarios in hurricane recovery of a transportation agency. Wei et al. (1991) describe failure mode, effects and criticality analysis for scenario identification. Scheringer (2001) performs scenario based risk assessment to "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe a method for tracking model complexity in system vulnerability analysis. The method builds on the collection of risk scenarios describing known vulnerabilities of systems and system components. We introduce the concept of an interaction as a mapping between a risk scenario and one or more system components. An interaction is direct when the mapping is obvious. An interaction is indirect when the mapping can make use of nonobvious relationships among system components. Indirect interactions characterize the rippling effects of a risk scenario and are used to identify the nonobvious interdependencies. With the above foundation, the method extends traditional process control charts to track evolving knowledge of scenarios and systems. The charts signal the emergence of anomalous variation in emerging knowledge of system vulnerability. The method is applied iteratively to avoid situations of surprise in an emerging model (scenarios and systems) of system vulnerability. An application of the method is discussed
    Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE; 05/2004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The feasibility of integrating failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and sneak circuit analysis (SCA) into a comprehensive reliability analysis technique is examined especially from the perspective of automation. FMEA looks at a system's strengths and weaknesses; SCA looks for latent circuit conditions which may lead to unplanned or unexpected modes of operation. The goals of the two techniques complement each other and their combination results in a more comprehensive analysis than either technique alone can achieve. The rich collection of heuristics used in SCA can be applied to design validation and also used as guidelines at various stages of system design. At both the functional level and the component level, the combined analysis is done using the same circuit representation as for the SCA and for the FMEA, and draws on the same database
    Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1993. Proceedings., Annual; 02/1993
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Presents a new qualitative fault tree evaluation algorithm based on bit manipulation techniques for the identification of the largest independent sub-trees and the subsequent determination of all minimal cut sets of large and complex fault trees. The methodology developed is validated by direct application to a complex fault tree taken from the literature. Results obtained are compared with those available in the literature. Shows that the use of the algorithm (FTABMT) developed results in significant savings in both computer time and storage requirements.
    International Journal of Quality &amp Reliability Management 02/1996; 13(2):114-132. DOI:10.1108/02656719610110069
Show more