Conference Proceeding

Archives for coronary angiography: a comparison of cinefilm vs. video vs. digital

German Heart Inst. Berlin
11/1992; DOI:10.1109/CIC.1992.269396 ISBN: 0-8186-3552-5 pp.263 - 266 In proceeding of: Computers in Cardiology 1992. Proceedings.
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The appropriate storage and archiving of angiographic images and
data still represents a major problem in coronary angiography. Usually
one of these three physical media is used: cine film, videotape, or
digital storage. The properties of these different archive tapes are
analyzed by comparing their benefits for clinical practice. The most
important criterion for clinical diagnosis is the image quality.
Extensive studies have been performed to compare images from digital
storage, digitized cine film, VHS videotape, and worn videotape. By
using special X-ray phantoms, various image properties were measured.
The results show that digital images have the best quality in terms of
noise, sharpness, and pointspreading. Cine film has advantages in
spatial resolution, but disadvantages in contrast. The video images,
especially those from worn tape, have a dramatic loss of spatial
resolution and sharpness. Digital technology offers several progressions
like online enhancement, fast accessibility, quantitative coronary
analysis, data integration, communication, and telemedicine

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views

Keywords

angiographic images
 
appropriate storage
 
clinical practice
 
coronary angiography
 
data integration
 
different archive tapes
 
digital images
 
digital storage
 
Digital technology
 
disadvantages
 
Extensive studies
 
fast accessibility
 
major problem
 
spatial resolution
 
special X-ray phantoms
 
three physical media
 
various image properties
 
VHS videotape
 
video images
 
videotape
 

J Beier