Article

Power system transmission network expansion planning using AC model

Univ. of Campinas, Campinas
IET Generation Transmission & Distribution (Impact Factor: 1.41). 10/2007; DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd:20060465
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT An optimisation technique to solve transmission network expansion planning problem, using the AC model, is presented. This is a very complex mixed integer nonlinear programming problem. A constructive heuristic algorithm aimed at obtaining an excellent quality solution for this problem is presented. An interior point method is employed to solve nonlinear programming problems during the solution steps of the algorithm. Results of the tests, carried out with three electrical energy systems, show the capabilities of the method and also the viability of using the AC model to solve the problem.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
186 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a mathematical model for multistage transmission expansion planning (TEP) considering fixed series compensation (FSC) allocation and N-1 security constraints for both transmission lines and FSCs. FSCs can increase the transmission lines transfer capacity, but the importance of using them in TEP is to dispatch the power more efficiently, resulting in a different topology with less investment cost compared with planning without FSCs. This problem is modeled as a linear mixed binary programming problem and is solved by a commercial branch-and-cut solver to obtain the optimum solution. FSC is modeled as a fixed impedance located in the transmission lines in discrete steps and with an investment cost based on the prices of reinforcement lines. The results obtained using two known test systems show the economic benefits of using FSC in multistage TEP problems.
    IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 01/2013; 28(4):3795-3805. · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Operational planning of power systems, especially in terms of overall reliability and security, is a key issue in the smart grid development. Hence, it is necessary to develop new strategies to cope with increasing uncertainties arising from the fast changing ways power systems are being operated. This paper presents a comprehensive approach to determine an optimal transmission network expansion plan considering the enhancement of small-signal stability through wide-scale deployment of the existing and planned transmission system assets. The dynamic model of the transmission network operational planning (TNOP) is solved based on a combination of the Mean-Variance Mapping Optimization (MVMO), and the classic dynamic programming method embedded with a heuristic procedure. Besides, a probabilistic eigenanalysis-based recursive method is proposed to determine the optimal control strategies that are highly relevant to the enhancement of the system small-signal stability performance throughout the planning horizon. Numerical results demonstrate the viewpoint and the effectiveness of the proposed approach in providing optimal strategies of minimum cost while avoiding the instability risk associated to poorly damped low-frequency electromechanical oscillations.
    IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 03/2013; 4(1):530 - 539. · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We formulate mixed-integer conic approximations to AC transmission system planning. The first applies lift-and-project relaxations to a nonconvex model built around a semidefinite power flow relaxation. We then employ a quadratically constrained approximation to the DistFlow equations in constructing a second-order cone model that is convex without relaxation. We solve mixed integer linear and second-order cone programs using commercial software and assess their performance on two benchmark problems. As with DC power flow models and linear AC relaxations, the new models usually produce solutions which are infeasible under the original constraints. However, they are nearer to feasibility, and therefore represent stronger alternatives.
    IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 01/2013; 28(2):952-959. · 2.92 Impact Factor