Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of information need in the context of the impact of new information and communications technologies on the communication of parliamentary information.

Journal of Documentation (Impact Factor: 1.06). 03/2002; DOI: 10.1108/00220410210425458
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT This paper discusses critically the theoretical and methodological background to an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) research project designed to investigate the impact of Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) on the communication of parliamentary and legislative information to the general public or citizen. It sets out the context of the study in terms of the changes in governance, resulting from devolution and, via a wide ranging literature review, describes the ways in which the authors’ research approach has developed. The design of the project methodology, that of an interactive online interview executed via a roadshow, is also described. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the results of a customer knowledge study commissioned by the Parliamentary Documentation Centre (PDC) of the European Parliament in order to elicit a better understanding of the views and needs of its actual and potential client base. Design/methodology/approach – The study consisted of in-depth, face-to-face interviews with 72 clients and 11 staff (83 individuals) in Brussels in February 2004. The paper explores the significance of information in the parliamentary context and summarises the activities which respondents described as being information-dependent. The paper also highlights the evolutionary nature of information need during the course of the legislative process. Findings – The information-seeking behaviour and skills of the PDC clients are discussed, as are the criteria by which they assess information quality. The study revealed that users were frequently uncritical and pragmatic in use of the most readily available information, sacrificing quality in favour of ease of access. Originality/value – This paper presents results from a uniquely complex information environment – the European Union. Users tended to be complacent about their information-seeking skills and reluctant to engage in skills enhancement activities.
    Journal of Documentation 01/2007; 63(6):920-934. · 1.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is not only a lack of research that conceptualises the information needs of informal carers but also a shortage in research that addresses those needs from the perspective of information systems in the health care system. This shortage of systematic and conceptualised research on information needs of informal carers often prohibits the information providers and developers from knowing what types of information informal carers need to support their roles and tasks as carers and to evaluate how well they are fulfilling the information needs of informal carers. Drawing upon the previous available research on information needs in general and information needs of informal carers in particular, this paper proposes a conceptual model of the information needs of informal carers. The conceptual model illustrates four abstraction groups of information needs of informal carers i.e. recognised demanded, unrecognised demanded, recognised undemanded, and unrecognised undemanded. The paper highlights the potential usefulness of the model.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – This paper seeks to organize the extensive field and to compile the complete list of information limits. Design/methodology/approach – A thorough analysis of literature from the field beginning with the 1960s up to the present has been performed. Findings – A universal typology of information limits has been proposed. A list of barriers mentioned in the literature of the subject has been compiled. Research limitations/implications – The term “information limits” is not commonly used. Originality/value – The complete list of information limits with bibliographical hints (helpful for future research) is presented.
    Aslib Proceedings 01/2011; 63(4):364-379. · 0.43 Impact Factor