Noise and signal analysis of Ir/Au TES with asymmetrical slits parallel to the electric current

Nat. Inst. of Adv. Ind. Sci. & Technol., Ibaraki, Japan
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity (Impact Factor: 1.2). 07/2005; DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2005.849896
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT A multi-pixel TES array is one of the attractive methods to read-out the incident x-ray position, which simplifies a read-out circuit for imaging applications. We fabricated a ten-pixel Ir/Au TES microcalorimeter with asymmetrical slits parallel to the electric current, and analyzed its noise and signal characteristics. The device was successfully operated in a strong electro-thermal feedback (ETF) mode. However, very large excess noise is observed, which cannot be explained by the noise theory for a single pixel TES. We have modeled the multi-pixel TES array as separated thermal group components, and analyzed noise performance theoretically. As a result, the current noise in our theory is well agreed with the measured noise at a low frequency below 3 kHz. From the x-ray irradiation measurements, ten divided signal groups are observed, which will be associated with the incident x-ray position pixel. The best energy resolution was 18 eV (FWHM) for 5.9 keV x-rays at 0.5 μV bias voltage.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report the latest design and experimental results for a Position-Sensitive Transition-Edge Sensor (PoST). The PoST is motivated by the desire to achieve a larger field-of-view without increasing the number of readout channels. A PoST consists of a one-dimensional array of X-ray absorbers connected on each end to a Transition Edge Sensor (TES). Position differentiation is achieved through a comparison of pulses between the two TESs and X-ray energy is inferred from a sum of the two signals. Optimizing such a device involves studying the available parameter space which includes device properties such as heat capacity and thermal conductivity as well as TES read-out circuitry parameters. We present results for different regimes of operation and the effects on energy resolution, throughput, and position differentiation. Results and implications from a non-linear model developed to study the saturation effects unique to PoSTs are also presented.
    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment 01/2004; 520:505-507. · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We are developing a new x-ray microcalorimeter based on superconducting transition edge sensors (TES) as an imaging sensor. This device has ten pixelated transition edge sensors with Iridium superconductive films. When a constant bias voltage is applied to all pixels, each pixel is operated at slightly different equilibrium temperature. This arises from the different thermal responses between pixels, so that response signal shapes would vary according to the position of the incident x-ray. We have fabricated a prototype of the pixelated array and examined its performance. The position dependency measurements by scanning the collimated x-ray over the device have successfully shown that the device is able to resolve its pixel position. The energy resolution of a test device was 13.1 eV (FWHM) for 3 keV x-rays.
    IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 07/2003; · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present recent results from our γ-ray transition-edge sensor (TES) microcalorimeters. We have demonstrated an energy resolution of 52 eV at 60 keV with devices composed of a high-purity Sn absorber and a Mo/Cu multilayer thin-film TES. In this paper, we present a detailed noise analysis of these devices and show that the major noise sources are device originated (thermal fluctuation and Johnson noise). Our performance analysis explicitly includes the noise contribution due to the composite geometry of these devices and electro-thermal feedback (ETF).
    IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 07/2003; · 1.20 Impact Factor