Article

The impact of gated communities on property values: evidences of changes in real estate markets (Los Angeles, 1980-2000)

01/2007;
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT The paper focuses on how gated communities, as private means of provision of public infrastructure and security, real estate products and club-economies, produce changes in housing market patterns. Based on an empirical study of Los Angeles (California) data, it aims to trace to which extent gates and walls favor property values and if the presence of gated communities produces over time (1980-2000) a deterrent effect on non-gated properties abutting the enclave, or close to it.
Resulting of a demand for security, gated communities are a leading offer from the homebuilding industry. But their sprawl emerges from a partnership between local governments and land developers. Both agree to charge the homebuyer with the cost of urban sprawl (construction and maintenance costs of infrastructures within the gates). Such a structuring of residential space is then particularly desirable on the urban edges, where the cost of urban sprawl exceeds the financial assets of local public authorities. New private developments provide local governments with new wealthy taxpayers at almost no cost. As compensation, the homebuyer is granted with a private and exclusive access to sites and amenities (lakes, beaches, etc.). Such exclusivity favors the location rent, and usually positively affects the property value within the gated enclaves.
But it is also assumed that operating cost of private governance are paid for by the increase of property values. Market failure nevertheless occurs when costs are raising above a sustainable level compared to property values.
Changes produced by gates lead to at least two outcomes. At first sight, residential enclosures produce a price premium, thus being a smart investment. Furthermore, gated communities might well be able to generate enough property value to pay off the price of private governance. But the analysis stands on a short term basis. Larger and wealthier gated communities are successful in shielding their property values and generate enough revenue to pay for a cost of private governance, whereas a majority of average middle class gated enclaves do not succeed in creating a significant price premium, and / or did not maintain significant growth of price during the last decade. Such gated neighborhoods are at risk of a market failure in the private provision of urban infrastructure, leading to potential decay.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
119 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suburbanization has been a prominent urban process in the United States since the World War II. It has transformed American cities in profound ways in every single aspect of urban development; from population and wealth distributions, through political organization and affiliations, to the built environment. This paper investigates the link between gated communities and the process of suburbanization in the context of socio-economic inequality. It has been shown time and again in the scholarly literature on suburbanization, that suburban neighborhoods in American cities have been traditionally more affluent and less diverse than central cities. The research on gated communities in the US also shows that they are, on average, more affluent compared to other communities in terms of family income and housing values. Are gated communities then simply a new form of suburban communities? Is the gated community in fact a suburban community with the added element of security features? The paper investigates these questions based on segregation and spatial analyses. The research contributes to the long line of studies on suburbanization, gating and the larger issues of urban inequality. KeywordsSuburbanization–Gated communities–Segregation–Inequality
    GeoJournal 01/2012; 77(2):203-222.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What is called ‘sustainable urbanism and connectivity’ – the ability to move around town easily – is essential to the properly functioning city, especially in the past few decades which witnessed a practical orientation toward gated communities and divided cities. Given that gated communities are spatially a kind of enclave, Setha M. Low, among other anthropologists, in her book (Behind the Gates: Security and the New American Dream) has argued that they have a negative effect on the overall social capital of the broader community outside the gated community (Low, 2004). Some argue that Gated Communities offer promises of healthy, comfort, convenience, various services, peace and quiet environment. Other emphasize lush manicured landscape, architecture character, security, and distinctive amenities and services facilities (Ahmed, 2009). Other argue that Gated Communities provide the desire for an imaginary or imagined community leads consumers to look for enhanced suburban environments of the kind promised by these contemporary movements . This paper will define the term "Gated Community ", then understand how it started globally, followed by its significant criticism. Through analyzing the recent practice of gated communities in Cairo region, and comparing it with sustainable urban principles of good community, and examine its connectivity with the Egyptian urban fabric, the paper will end up formulating a series of recommendation which can achieve better connectivity and sustainability, and how to benefit from this type of urban development. Paper assumes that these new trends in developing new cities can create different urban, functional, social and economic problems, which can be adapted and solved through developing a new vision to connect the urban fabric with the surrounding housing areas. To prove that, some important questions will be answered through the research process: What are the different types of gated communities? Are there any design principles codes for each similar community in Cairo? Is there any role of public authorities in understanding and directing this type of communities according to greater vision of urban development? Do gated communities have a one way impact only on adjacent community or micro community? Or there is a double impact on both macro public community and also micro private community?
    Contemporary Urban Issues Conference (CUI'13) - DAKAM, Istanbul, Turkey; 11/2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper focuses on how gated communities, as private means of provision of public infrastructure and security, real estate products and club-economies, produce changes in housing market patterns. Based on an empirical study of Los Angeles (California) data, it aims to trace to which extent gates and walls favor property values and if the presence of gated communities produces over time (1980-2000) a deterrent effect on non-gated properties abutting the enclave, or close to it. Resulting of a demand for security, gated communities are a leading offer from the homebuilding industry. But their sprawl emerges from a partnership between local governments and land developers. Both agree to charge the homebuyer with the cost of urban sprawl (construction and maintenance costs of infrastructures within the gates). Such a structuring of residential space is then particularly desirable on the urban edges, where the cost of urban sprawl exceeds the financial assets of local public authorities. New private developments provide local governments with new wealthy taxpayers at almost no cost. As compensation, the homebuyer is granted with a private and exclusive access to sites and amenities (lakes, beaches, etc.). Such exclusivity favors the location rent, and usually positively affects the property value within the gated enclaves. But it is also assumed that operating cost of private governance are paid for by the increase of property values. Market failure nevertheless occurs when costs are raising above a sustainable level compared to property values. Changes produced by gates lead to at least two outcomes. At first sight, residential enclosures produce a price premium, thus being a smart investment. Furthermore, gated communities might well be able to generate enough property value to pay off the price of private governance. But the analysis stands on a short term basis. Larger and wealthier gated communities are successful in shielding their property values and generate enough revenue to pay for a cost of private governance, whereas a majority of average middle class gated enclaves do not succeed in creating a significant price premium, and / or did not maintain significant growth of price during the last decade. Such gated neighborhoods are at risk of a market failure in the private provision of urban infrastructure, leading to potential decay.
    01/2007;

Full-text

View
2 Downloads
Available from