Stray current control in DC mass transit systems

Sch. of Electr. Eng. & Electron., Univ. of Manchester, UK
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (Impact Factor: 2.64). 04/2005; DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2004.842462
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT Stray current control is essential in direct current (DC) mass transit systems where the rail insulation is not of sufficient quality to prevent a corrosion risk to the rails, supporting and third-party infrastructure. This paper details the principles behind the need for stray current control and examines the relationship between the stray current collection system design and its efficiency. The use of floating return rails is shown to provide a reduction in stray current level in comparison to a grounded system, significantly reducing the corrosion level of the traction system running rails. An increase in conductivity of the stray current collection system or a reduction in the soil resistivity surrounding the traction system is shown to decrease the corrosion risk to the supporting and third party infrastructure.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In DC-electrified railway systems, rails are used to navigate trains as well as providing the returning path of train’s electric current to the traction power substation (TPS). Due to electrical resistance of rails and the conductivity between rail and ground, a part of train returning current to the TPS permeate in the ground which causes different problems like increasing of rails potential that increase of rails potential leads to death hazards for the train station personnel and stray current increment causes metal’s corrosion and decrease of their lifetime. Therefore, surveying electric railway system in order to know the unfavorable effects of rails potential and stray currents is an essential matter. In this paper, effect of control methods on stray current and rail potential amount and analysis of this current with Finite Element Method (FEM) is presented.
    4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Railway Engineering (ICRARE2015), Tehran, Iran; 05/2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper analyzes electrochemical corrosion consequence that the orbit traffic stray current acts on buried metal. According to regularities of distribution of orbit traffic stray current, it analyzes the rationality that CAN bus is used in orbit traffic stray current monitoring, and designed the online monitoring system of stray current based on CAN. The system was verified through the laboratory simulation.
    04/2011; 225-226:1336-1340. DOI:10.4028/
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper addresses the results of the microstructure and numerical simulation and corrosion analysis and effects of return (DC) current. The results of this research indicate that rail base corrosion can shorten rail’s life from several decades to one year or less compromising integrity and transit system safety. Rail base corrosion is characteristic of rails located in tunnels or wet undergrounds. Rail base corrosion is the result of a combination of factors including humidity, accumulated salts at tie plates and clips, but most importantly the return current (DC) from the transit car traction motors. These factors promote galvanic reactions that increase corrosion rate of the rail. Perhaps the amount of rail lost due to corrosion is no more than 0.005% (6.5 kg km−1 year−1) this apparently does not represent a major concern; however, rail base corrosion initiates and propagates by the local removal of the rail forming intricate shapes that act as stress concentrator reducing fatigue life performance. Under extreme circumstances a few grams of lost rail in the right location, with the right geometry and orientation can be responsible for its removal or failure shortening rail’s life to less than a year and can compromise safety. The use of plastic ties and a return stray current system seem to be the most suitable solution for rail base corrosion.
    Engineering Failure Analysis 01/2009; 16(1):281-294. DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.05.011 · 1.13 Impact Factor