Article

Diagnostic epididymal and testicular sperm recovery and genetic aspects in azoospermic men

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Human Reproduction (Impact Factor: 4.67). 02/1999; DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.118
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Various procedures for sperm recovery in azoospermic men have been described, from open testicular biopsy to simple needle aspiration from the epididymis and the testis. Fifty-one obstructive and 86 non-obstructive azoospermic men were treated to compare the recovery of spermatozoa obtained by percutaneous aspiration from the epididymis (PESA) and aspiration/extraction from the testis (TESA, TESE) with histopathology. If TESA failed, the work up proceeded with TESE. All patients were karyotyped. Spermatozoa were recovered by PESA or TESA in all obstructive men (51/51 patients). In 22 out of 86 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, testicular spermatozoa could be successfully recovered by TESA. In five additional patients TESE was successful in recovering spermatozoa where TESA had failed. In 43 patients, neither TESA nor TESE was successful. Sixteen patients chose not to proceed with TESE. Seven out of 86 patients had an abnormal karyotype in the non-obstructive group (8%), none in the obstructive group. In the non-obstructive patient group testicular histopathology showed hypospermatogenesis, incomplete maturation arrest and germ cell aplasia with focal spermatogenesis in cases where spermatozoa were recovered and complete germ cell aplasia, complete maturation arrest and fibrosis in cases where no spermatozoa were found. Spermatozoa were recovered by PESA or TESA from all patients with obstructive azoospermia and from ~40% of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia by TESA or TESE. Retrieval of viable spermatozoa in the infertility work-up was highly predictable for sperm recovery in subsequent ICSI cycles. TESA performed under local anaesthesia seems almost as effective as more invasive procedures in recovering testicular spermatozoa, both in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
58 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To define predictive factors of mobile spermatozoa recovery in azoospermic patients. Testicular volume, serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin (PRL) and testosterone levels were assessed in 60 azoospermic patients. Patients underwent bilateral testicular biopsy with local anesthesia. Samples were classified according to absence of spermatozoa, presence of motile and nonmotile spermatozoa, and histological findings. Age, hormone levels, testicular volume and histology with motile spermatozoa recovery were compared. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Non-obstructive azoospermia was diagnosed in 45 patients. Significant differences were detected between the group with motile spermatozoa recovery and the group with absence of spermatozoa in terms of FSH levels (P=0.037 ANOVA one-way). A ROC curve was used to define FSH values below 16.05 IU/L (sensitivity: 76.2%, specificity: 67.7%) as predictive factors for motile spermatozoa recovery. Other statistical differences were not detected. FSH levels below 16.05 IU/L showed good accuracy to predict the presence of motile spermatozoa in the testicular biopsy of azoospermic patients. Physical examination, testosterone levels, LH and prolactin were not useful as predictive factors in the present study.
    Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira 01/2003; 49(2):167-72. · 0.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A retrospective study was carried out on 159 treatment cycles in 148 secretory azoospermic patients to determine whether histopathological secretory azoospermic subgroups were predictive for gamete retrieval, and to evaluate outcome of microinjection using fresh or frozen-thawed testicular sperm and spermatids. Sperm and spermatids were recovered by open testicular biopsy and microinjected into oocytes. Fertilization and pregnancy rates were assessed. In hypoplasia, 97.7% of the 44 patients had late spermatids/sperm recovered. In maturation-arrest (MA; 47 patients), 31.9% had complete MA, and 68.1% incomplete MA due to a focus of early (36.2%) or late (31.9%) spermiogenesis. Gamete retrieval was achieved in 53.3, 41.2 and 93.3% of the cases respectively. In Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS; 57 patients), 61.4% were complete SCOS, whereas incomplete SCOS cases showed one focus of MA (5.3%), or of early (29.8%) and late (3.5%) spermiogenesis. Only 29.8% of the patients had a successful gamete retrieval, 2.9% in complete and 77.3% in incomplete SCOS cases. In total, there were 87 ICSI, 39 elongated spermatid injection (ELSI) and 33 round spermatid injection (ROSI) treatment cycles, with mean values of fertilization rate of 71.4, 53.6 and 17%, and clinical pregnancy rates of 31.7, 26.3 and 0% respectively. Histopathological subgroups were positively correlated with successful gamete retrieval. No major outcome differences were observed between testicular sperm and elongated spermatids, either fresh or frozen-thawed. However, injection of intact round-spermatids showed very low rates of fertilization and no pregnancies.
    Human Reproduction 08/2002; 17(7):1800-10. · 4.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the efficacy of the two most common sperm retrieval procedures, testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) as part of the diagnostic work-up in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Three hundred fifty men who underwent diagnostic surgical sperm recovery between January 1997 and December 2006. A diagnostic TESA was initially performed in 281 men with testes of >12 mm(3). If no spermatozoa or an insufficient number of spermatozoa was found, most of the men underwent a diagnostic TESE. Diagnostic TESE was performed as the only surgical procedure in 69 men who had at least one testis < or =12 mm(3). Success rates of diagnostic TESA and diagnostic TESE. Spermatozoa were found in 129 (45.9%) of the 281 men who underwent TESA. However, in 29 of these men too few spermatozoa were identified for the men to be accepted for IVF/ICSI. The subsequent TESE resulted in 26 additional men being accepted for IVF/ICSI. In men with testes < or =12 mm(3) a sufficient number of spermatozoa were found in 27 out of 69 men following TESE. The study shows that in 52% of the men with non-obstructive azoospermia spermatozoa useful for ICSI can be identified. For at least one-third of the men with testes >12 mm(3) TESA is a sufficient procedure. Sperm retrieval rate is further increased following a subsequent TESE.
    Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 01/2008; 87(10):1033-8. · 1.85 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
34 Downloads
Available from
May 15, 2014