Article

Properties of LYSO and recent LSO scintillators for phoswich PET detectors

Dept. of Nucl. Med. & Radiobiol., Univ. de Sherbrooke, Que., Canada
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (Impact Factor: 1.46). 07/2004; DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2004.829781
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The luminescence and nuclear spectroscopic properties of the new cerium-doped rare-earth scintillator lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (Lu0.6Y1.4Si0.5:Ce, LYSO) were investigated and compared to those of both recent and older LSO crystals. UV-excited luminescent spectra outline important similarities between LYSO and LSO scintillators. The two distinct Ce1 and Ce2 luminescence mechanisms previously identified in LSO are also present in LYSO scintillators. The energy and timing resolutions were measured using avalanche photodiode (APD) and photomultiplier tube (PMT) readouts. The dependence of energy resolution on gamma-ray energy was also assessed to unveil the crystal intrinsic resolution parameters. In spite of significant progress in light output and luminescence properties, the energy resolution of these scintillators appears to still suffer from an excess variance in the number of scintillation photons. Pulse-shape discrimination between LYSO and LSO scintillators has been successfully achieved in phoswich assemblies, confirming LYSO, with a sufficient amount of yttrium to modify the decay time, to be a potential candidate for depth-of-interaction determination in multicrystal PET detectors.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Catherine Michelle Pepin, Mar 11, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
237 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Scintillation crystal design is a critical component in positron emission tomography system development, which impacts a number of performance parameters including energy resolution, time resolution and spatial resolution. Our work aims to develop a generalized simulation tool to model the light transport inside scintillation crystals with good accuracy, taking into account surface treatments, reflectors, temporal dependence of scintillation decay, and comprehensive experimental validations. The simulation has been validated against both direct analytical calculation and experimental measurements. In this work, the studies were performed for a lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate crystal of 3×3×20 mm3 dimension coupled to a Hamamatsu silicon photomultiplier, with respect to light output, rise-time slope, energy resolution and time resolution. Four crystal surface treatment and reflector configurations were investigated: GroundMetal, GroundPaint, PolishMetal and PolishPaint. The experiments were performed to validate the Monte Carlo simulation results. The results indicate that the best time resolution (0.96±0.05 ns) and good energy resolution (10.6±0.4%) could be produced by using a polished surface with specular reflector, while the configuration of a polished surface with diffusive reflector produces the best energy resolution (10.2±0.9%). The results indicate that a polished surface with diffusive reflector achieves the best energy resolution (10.2±0.9%) for 511 keV high energy photons, and a polished surface with specular reflector achieves the best time resolution (0.96±0.05 ns) measured against a Hamamatsu fast photomultiplier tube. The ground surface treatment is not recommended for its inferior performance in terms of energy and time resolution. Possible explanations and future improvements to be made to the developed simulation tool are discussed.
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 03/2013; 58(7):2143-2161. DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/58/7/2143 · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The scintillation response of the new Ce-doped lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (Lu1.95Y0.05SiO5:Ce, LYSO:Ce) crystal was investigated and compared to that of Ce-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate (Lu2SiO5:Ce, LSO:Ce) crystal. The light yield and energy resolution were measured using photomultiplier tube (XP5200B PMT) readout. For 662 keV γ-rays (137Cs source), the LYSO:Ce showed the light yield of 39,900 ph/MeV, which is higher than that of 35,900 ph/MeV obtained for LSO:Ce:Ce. The energy resolution of 8.2% obtained with LYSO:Ce is better than that of 10.6% obtained with LSO:Ce. The non-proportionality of the light yield and energy resolution versus γ-ray energy were measured and the intrinsic resolution of the crystals was calculated. Over the energy range from 16.6 keV to 1274.5 keV, the non-proportionality of about 35 % for LYSO:Ce is better than that of about 42% for LSO:Ce. The photofraction was determined for both crystals and compared with the cross-sections ratio calculated using WinXCOM program.
    Procedia Engineering 11/2011; 32:765-771. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.02.010
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High spatial resolution is essential to image small lesions in positron emission tomography. Traditional methods suggest using small crystals to obtain high resolution. In this study, a new method is introduced to achieve high spatial resolution by using scintillators with different decay times arranged in a checkerboard pattern. Pulse shape discrimination was implemented to determine which crystal the gamma energy was deposited. In this work, a 13×13 LSO crystal array and a 13×13 LSO-GSO checkerboard crystal array using 4×4×20 mm<sup>3</sup> crystals were built and optimized using light sharing techniques. Similarly, using 2.5×2.5×19 mm<sup>3</sup> LSO and LYSO crystals, a 17×17 LSO-LYSO checkerboard crystal array was built as a high-resolution application. The average pixel energy resolution for the 13×13 LSO was measured to be 14.5%. Similarly, the average pixel resolutions for the GSO part of the 13×13 LSO-GSO crystal array and the LSO part of the same array were measured to be 13.9% and 18.5%, respectively. The average crystal energy resolutions for the LSO and LYSO parts of the 17×17 LSO-LYSO crystal array were measured to be 23.5% and 24.2%, respectively. The average peak-to-valley ratios in the position profiles were measured to be 2.1 for the 13×13 LSO crystal array, 7.2 for the LSO part of the 13×13 LSO-GSO crystal array and 4.3 for the GSO part of the 13×13 LSO-GSO crystal array. Similarly, the average peak-to-valley ratios in the position profiles were measured to be 2.5 for the LSO part of the 17×17 LSO-LYSO crystal array and 2.7 for the LYSO part of the 17×17 LSO-LYSO crystal array.
    IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 03/2006; 53(1-53):18 - 24. DOI:10.1109/TNS.2005.862957 · 1.46 Impact Factor