Determinants of African Manufacturing Investment: the Microeconomic Evidence

Journal of African Economies (Impact Factor: 0.57). 01/2001; DOI: 10.1093/jae/10.Suppl2.48
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT In this survey paper we consider the microeconomic evidence on investment in African manufacturing. <?Pub Caret>We analyse both the determinants of investment behaviour and the return to that investment. In the 1990s market selection — the process by which the capital stock is reallocated in favour of more efficient firms — has been as strong in Africa as elsewhere. While the macroeconomic literature has focused on low returns to investment as an explanation for Africa's poor growth performance, the micro&hyphen;data indicate high potential returns. However, investment rates remain quite low, presumably as a result of risk, but the surveys currently available are not suitable for testing this.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper develops an empirically-relevant framework (a) to examine whether or not the African business environment hinders or promotes the knowledge economy (KE), (b) to determine how the KE which emerges from such an environment affects economic growth, and (c) how growth in turn relates to the ‘inclusive development’ of 53 African countries during the 1996-2010 time period. The framework provides a modest guide to policymaking about, and further research into, such relationships. We implement the framework by building a three-stage model and rationalizing it as five interrelated hypotheses. To allow greater concentration on the issues that are themselves already complex, our model is very simple, but clear. For example, we make neither an attempt to evaluate causality nor to test for it, even though we suspect the links to be multi-directional – opportunity costs are everywhere. Instead we focus on fundamental relationships between the dynamics of starting business and doing business as expressed in the state of KE, and through it to the inclusive development via the economic growth of those countries. Estimation results indicate that the dynamics of starting and doing business explain strongly a large part of variations in KE. The link between KE and economic growth exists, but it is weak, and we provide plausible reasons for such a result. Despite the weak association between KE and economic growth, KE-influenced growth plays a very important role in inclusive development. In fact, growth of this kind has stronger effects on inclusive development and by implication on poverty reduction, than some of conventional controls in this study such as FDI, foreign aid, and even private investment. There is clearly room for further research to improve the results, but just as clearly practical policy is best served by not neglecting the relationships examined in this paper.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper analyses firm dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa by focusing on growth and survival of manufacturing firms in Mozambique. Several results of interest emerge: (i) "Mid-size" firms are found to have a lower survival rate than those at the lower and upper ends of the size scale, suggesting the presence of either market or institutional imperfections. (ii) Demand uncertainty is related to firm survival, with survival associated with greater capacity utilisation over the year and a lower degree of volatility. Moreover, capacity utilisation is also found to be positively related to long-run growth rates, implying that the predictability of demand is especially important in Mozambique. (iii) A positive association between tax and regulatory burdens and firm growth are found suggesting (given the survival results), that growth into the mid-size region is associated with greater firm difficulties, part of which may be related to greater visibility to the authorities.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This paper examines the factors that influence firm entry, growth and survival in Africa and their policy implications. Analyses in the paper indicate that mmacroeconomic reforms, implemented by many African countries during the last two decades, are a necessary but not sufficient condition for firm entry and growth. In addition to consolidating recent improvements in the macroeconomic environment, more,microeconomic,reforms - the so-called second-generation reforms - are essential for African countries to promote,private sector development,and achieve growth rates commensurate,with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These reforms should aim to create a business environment and investment climate conducive to private sector development,both horizontally and vertically by simplifying regulations and reducing costs for more informal and new firms to register and helping these as well as existing firms to expand. As partial reforms have often proved inconsistent and inefficient, effective microeconomic,reforms should be well-coordinated - preferably through one institution that is independent from line ministries - regularly revised and inclusive of the concerns and initiatives of various stakeholders including chambers of commerce, workers’ organizations and other business networks and professional groups. Given that most African firms start too small to compete in internationalmarkets -a pre-requisite for industrial development,- African policy makers should give particular attention to the constraints and needs of small and medium,size firms in terms,of access to finance and enhancing management and business development capacity through training, linkages and networks. ATPC is a project of the Economic Commission for Africa with financial support of the Canada Fund for Africa This publication was produced with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Material from this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted. Acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 30, 2014