Technical Note: New ground-based FTIR measurements at Ile de La Réunion: Observations, error analysis, and comparisons with independent data

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS (Impact Factor: 5.05). 01/2008; 8(13). DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-3483-2008
Source: OAI


Ground-based high spectral resolution Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) solar absorption spectroscopy is a powerful remote sensing technique to obtain information on the total column abundances and on the vertical distribution of various constituents in the atmosphere. This work presents results from two short-term FTIR measurement campaigns in 2002 and 2004, held at the (sub)tropical site Ile de La Réunion (21°S, 55°E). These campaigns represent the first FTIR observations carried out at this site. The results include total column amounts from the surface up to 100 km of ozone (O3), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon monoxide (CO), ethane (C2H6), hydrogen chloride (HCl), hydrogen fluoride (HF) and nitric acid (HNO3), as well as some vertical profile information for the first four mentioned trace gases. The data are characterised in terms of the vertical information content and associated error budget. In the 2004 time series, the seasonal increase of the CO concentration was observed by the end of October, along with a sudden rise that has been attributed to biomass burning events in southern Africa and Madagascar. This attribution was based on trajectory modeling. In the same period, other biomass burning gases such as C2H6 also show an enhancement in their total column amounts which is highly correlated with the increase of the CO total columns. The observed total column values for CO are consistent with correlative data from MOPITT (Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere). Comparisons between our ground-based FTIR observations and space-borne observations from ACE-FTS (Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment – Fourier Transform Spectrometer) and HALOE (Halogen Occultation Experiment) confirm the feasibility of the FTIR measurements at Ile de La Réunion.

Download full-text


Available from: Bart Dils,
29 Reads
  • Source
    • "According to the estimates made in this work, the random component of the TC measurement error (at close signalltoonoise values) is 2.7%, and the HF line intensity specification error mainly contributes to the systematic error (4.3%). Similar estimates made in (Senten et al., 2008) indicated that the error total random compoo nent is 6% and the systematic error is ~5% (mainly due to the error of the HF absorption line intensity specii fication). Note that insignificant variations in errors estimated in different works are caused by different spectral intervals used and differences in the equipp ment characteristics, measurement conditions (solar zenith angles, etc.), and the states of the atmosphere during measurements. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Satellite and ground-based measurements of the hydrogen fluoride (HF) total content (TC) are analyzed and compared. The HF profiles measured with an FTS device on the ACE satellite are used to calculate the TC and compare it with the ground-based measurements near St. Petersburg in 2009–2011. A comparison indicated that the seasonal variations in HF TC based on two independent measurements are in good qualitative agreement. Rare (nine) cases of direct comparison between two measurement types coordinated with respect to time (during the day) and site (no farther than 500 km) gave the following characteristics: the average difference is 8% and satellite data predominate over ground data; the standard deviation of a difference is 7%. In two cases of close measurement pairs (closer than 200 km), a comparison gave differences of 1 and 7%. The statistical characteristics of differences between two measurement types are in good agreement with the independent comparison of the ACE-FTS HF TC measurements with the NDACC network data.
    Izvestiya Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 12/2013; 49(9). DOI:10.1134/S0001433813090211 · 0.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The lack of observations is mostly due to the inaccessibility of the tropical forests, as well as the lower priorities given to this region in the past. Ground-based solar absorption FTIR measurements of methane have been reported for Mauna Loa, Hawaii (19.5 • N, 155.6 • W) during February 1987 (Rinsland et al., 1988) and at Ile de La Réunion (21 • S, 55 • E) during two measurement campaigns in 2002 and 2004 (Senten et al., 2008). Both sites are located in the outer regions of the tropics . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total column concentrations of methane have been retrieved from ground-based solar absorption FTIR spectra in the near-infrared recorded in Paramaribo (Suriname). The methane FTIR observations are compared with TM5 model simulations and satellite observations from SCIAMACHY, and represent the first validation of SCIAMACHY retrievals in the inner tropics using ground-based remote sensing techniques. Apart from local biomass burning features, our methane FTIR observations agree well with TM5 model simulations. The comparison of the direct measured CH4/CO2 ratios by FTIR and satellite reveals that the satellite can hardly detect methane emissions of tropical biomass burning due to the used retrieval method.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 08/2010; 10(15). DOI:10.5194/acp-10-7231-2010 · 5.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "On the other hand, Wollongong and Darwin, Australia, are located close to emission sources and show large increases in CO related to near-by forest fires (Paton-Walsh et al., 2005, 2009). For Réunion limited observations are available but nevertheless the increase in CO during the tropical biomass burning season in the southern half of Africa is present, when Réunion is located under outflow of African biomass burning plumes (Duflot et al., 2010; Senten et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents a validation study of SCIAMACHY CO total column measurements from the IMLM algorithm using ground-based spectrometer observations from twenty surface stations for the five year time period of 2003–2007. Overall we find a good agreement between SCIAMACHY and ground-based observations for both mean values as well as seasonal variations. For high-latitude Northern Hemisphere stations absolute differences between SCIAMACHY and ground-based measurements are close to or fall within the SCIAMACHY CO 2σ precision of 0.2×1018 molecules/cm2 (~10%) indicating that SCIAMACHY can observe CO accurately at high Northern Hemisphere latitudes. For Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude stations the validation is complicated due to the vicinity of emission sources for almost all stations, leading to higher ground-based measurements compared to SCIAMACHY CO within its typical sampling area of 8×8°. Comparisons with Northern Hemisphere mountain stations are hampered by elevation effects. After accounting for these effects, the validation provides satisfactory results. At Southern Hemisphere mid- to high latitudes SCIAMACHY is systematically lower than the ground-based measurements for 2003 and 2004, but for 2005 and later years the differences between SCIAMACHY and ground-based measurements fall within the SCIAMACHY precision. The 2003–2004 bias is consistent with a previously reported Southern Hemisphere bias based on comparisons with MOPITT CO and is currently under investigation. No other systematic spatial or temporal biases could be identified based on the validation presented in this paper. Validation results are robust with regard to the choices of the instrument-noise error filter, sampling area, and time averaging required for the validation of SCIAMACHY CO total column measurements. Finally, our results show that the spatial coverage of the ground-based measurements available for the validation of the 2003–2007 SCIAMACHY CO columns is sub-optimal for validation purposes, and that the recent and ongoing expansion of the ground-based network by carefully selecting new locations may be very beneficial for SCIAMACHY CO and other satellite trace gas measurements validation efforts.
    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 07/2010; 3(4). DOI:10.5194/amt-3-1457-2010 · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more