Article

Development and standardisation of the Self-regulation Skills Interview (SRSI): A new clinical assessment tool for acquired brain injury

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (Impact Factor: 1.58). 03/2000;
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT The Self-regulation Skills Interview (SRSI) is a clinical tool designed to measure a range of metacognitive skills essential for rehabilitation planning, monitoring an individual's progress, and evaluating the outcome of treatment interventions. The results of the present study indicated that the SRSI has sound interrater reliability and test-retest reliability. A principle components analysis revealed three SRSI factors: Awareness, Readiness to Change, and Strategy Behavior. A comparison between a group of 61 participants with acquired brain injury (ABI) and a group of 43 non-brain-injured participants indicated that the participants with ABI had significantly lower levels of Awareness and Strategy Behavior, but that level of Readiness to Change was not significantly different between the two groups. The significant relationship observed between the SRSI factors and measures of neuropsychological functioning confirmed the concurrent validity of the scale and supports the value of the SRSI for post-acute assessment. Yes Yes

0 Bookmarks
 · 
257 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research suggests that some older individuals may lack awareness of personal falls risk; however, there is no validated scale to measure self-awareness of falls risk in this population. Therefore, the objective of this study is to describe the development and psychometric evaluation of a new three part (intellectual, emergent, and anticipatory) self-awareness of falls risk measure to be used in the older population undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. The Self-Awareness of Falls Risk Measure (SAFRM) underwent a comprehensive scale development process. Ninety-one participants aged over 60 years were recruited from rehabilitation wards with their treating physiotherapist and occupational therapist. The results indicated a three factor structure of the scale corresponding to the theoretically developed intellectual, emergent and anticipatory self-awareness sections which explained 50.26% of variance. The SAFRM demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α= .86 - .92), inter-rater reliability between clinicians (ICC = .61-.87), and convergent validity with a self-awareness interview (rs = .31 -.50). The SAFRM scores were significantly correlated with clinician-rated self-awareness (rs = -.40 - -.63) providing evidence of ecological validity. The present study provides initial empirical support of the reliability and validity of the SAFRM for assessment of self-awareness of falls risk in the older inpatient population. The availability of this measure will allow further investigation into the causes and consequences of reduced self-awareness in the older population.
    Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 09/2014; · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Impulsivity is a common and debilitating sequela following traumatic brain injury (TBI), but there is no consensual definition or measure to assess this construct. The following review aims to elucidate the differences and resemblances between impulsivity, disinhibition and other related terms following brain injury and the instruments that are commonly used to measure these constructs. To do so, a search through different databases was conducted in order to find articles that mention and define impulsivity, disinhibition, impulse control, regulation deficits, dyscontrol and risky behavior. The concepts that stand out from the literature, the measures used, the similarities, the differences between these concepts are observed. The fit with the UPPS model of impulsivity, according to which impulsivity is a multidimensional concept composed of four distinct dimensions (urgency, perseverance, premeditation and sensation-seeking) is discussed.
    Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland). 01/2014; 4(4):352-370.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize the evaluation process for individuals with suspected cognitive disabilities. The Cognitive Functional Evaluation (CFE) process yields a comprehensive profile of the clients' cognitive strengths and weaknesses in occupational performance. The components of the CFE are outlined in six stages as a decision tree with examples of standardized instruments from which to choose the assessments for each client evaluated: (1) interview and background information; (2) cognitive screening and baseline status tests; (3) general measures of cognition and executive functions in occupation; (4) cognitive tests for specific domains; (5) measures of specific cognitive domains in occupations; and (6) environmental assessment. The first three stages are required to ascertain basic cognitive abilities underlying occupational performance. Tests for each stage can be chosen from the ones listed according to the client characteristics and the theory utilized, there is no need to use all of them. Once this data is available a further decision is made whether a more in-depth assessment is needed (stages (4) and (5)). The environmental component is evaluated in all instances with at least one of the assessments. The CFE process for individuals with suspected cognitive disabilities is recommended to be used by occupational therapists as a common ground for evaluation, documentation, and communicating information.
    Occupational Therapy in Health Care 01/2009; 23(1):1-23.