Whole-stream metabolism in two montane streams: Contribution of the hyporheic zone

Limnology and Oceanography (Impact Factor: 3.62). 01/2001; DOI: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.3.0523
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT We used whole-stream and benthic chamber methods to measure rates of metabolism and determine the contribution of the hyporheic zone to ecosystem respiration (R) in two streams with differing surface–subsurface exchange characteristics, Rio Calaveras and Gallina Creek, New Mexico. We used the difference between whole-stream and benthic R to calculate the rate of hyporheic zone R and coupled this estimate to an independent measure of hyporheic sediment R to estimate the cross-sectional area of the hyporheic zone (AH) for two reaches from each stream. Conservative tracer injections and solute transport modeling were used to characterize surface–subsurface hydrologic exchange by determining values of the cross-sectional area of the transient storage zone (As). The hyporheic zone contributed a substantial proportion of whole-stream R in all four study reaches, ranging from 40 to 93%. Wholestream R, hyporheic R, and percent contribution of hyporheic R all increased as transient storage increased, with whole-stream and hyporheic R exhibiting significant relationships with As. All three measures of respiration and values of AH were much greater for both reaches of the stream with greater surface–subsurface exchange. AH is valuable for cross-site comparisons because it accounts for differences in rates of both benthic and hyporheic sediment R and can be used to predict the importance of the hyporheic zone to other stream ecosystem processes. Yes Yes

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Primary production and respiration in streams, collectively referred to as stream ecosystem metabolism, are fundamental processes that determine trophic structure, biomass and nutrient cycling. Few studies have used high-frequency measurements of gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER) over extended periods to characterise the factors that control stream ecosystem metabolism at hourly, daily, seasonal and annual scales. 2. We measured ecosystem metabolism at 5-min intervals for 23 months in Shepherd Creek, a small suburban stream in Cincinnati, Ohio (U.S.A.). 3. Daily GPP was best predicted by a model containing light and its synergistic interaction with water temperature. Water temperature alone was not significantly related to daily GPP, rather high temperatures enhanced the capacity of autotrophs to use available light. 4. The relationship between GPP and light was further explored using photosynthesis–irradiance curves (P–I curves). Light saturation of GPP was evident throughout the winter and spring and the P–I curve frequently exhibited strong counterclockwise hysteresis. Hysteresis occurred when water temperatures were greater in the afternoon than in the morning, although light was similar, further suggesting that light availability interacts synergistically with water temperature. 5. Storm flows strongly depressed GPP in the spring while desiccation arrested aquatic GPP and ER in late summer and autumn. 6. Ecosystem respiration was best predicted by GPP, water temperature and the rate of water exchange between the surface channel and transient storage zones. We estimate that c. 70% of newly fixed carbon was immediately respired by autotrophs and closely associated heterotrophs. 7. Interannual, seasonal, daily and hourly variability in ecosystem metabolism was attributable to a combination of light availability, water temperature, storm flow dynamics and desiccation. Human activities affect all these factors in urban and suburban streams, suggesting stream ecosystem processes are likely to respond in complex ways to changing land use and climate.
    Freshwater Biology 05/2013; 58(5). · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction "Differentiation between hydrologic and nonhydrologic processes is critical to an understanding of solute dynamics." —Stream Solute Workshop (1990) Many studies of nutrient cycling in streams have focused on small watersheds in which the quantification of nutrient fluxes and the development of nutrient budgets is scientifi-cally and logistically tractable (e.g., Meyer 1979, Grimm et al. 1981, Triska et al. 1984, Likens and Bormann 1995). This emphasis on small watersheds is appropriate given recent research highlighting the importance of small streams in pro-cessing and retaining nutrients (Alexander et al. 2000, Peter-son et al. 2001). A key component of many small watershed studies has been the experimental addition of nutrients (Meyer 1979, Mulholland et al. 1983, Triska et al. 1989, Stream Solute Workshop 1990). Nutrient addition experiments are designed to study the cycling of nutrients in stream ecosys-tems where hydrologic and nonhydrologic processes deter-mine nutrient fate. Because of the importance of hydrologic processes in stream ecosystems, a conceptual model of nutri- Abstract Nutrient addition experiments are designed to study the cycling of nutrients in stream ecosystems where hydro-logic and nonhydrologic processes determine nutrient fate. Because of the importance of hydrologic processes in stream ecosystems, a conceptual model known as nutrient spiraling is frequently employed. A central part of the nutrient spiraling approach is the determination of uptake length (S w), the average distance traveled by dissolved nutrients in the water column before uptake. Although the nutrient spiraling concept has been an invaluable tool in stream ecology, the current practice of estimating uptake length from steady-state nutrient data using linear regression (called here the "S w approach") presents a number of limitations. These limitations are identified by com-paring the exponential S w equation with analytical solutions of a stream solute transport model. This comparison indicates that (1) S w is an aggregate measure of uptake that does not distinguish between main channel and storage zone processes, (2) S w is an integrated measure of numerous hydrologic and nonhydrologic processes—this process integration may lead to difficulties in interpretation when comparing estimates of S w , and (3) estimates of uptake velocity and areal uptake rate (v f and U) based on S w are not independent of system hydrology. Given these find-ings, a transport-based approach to nutrient spiraling is presented for steady-state and time-series data sets. The transport-based approach for time-series data sets is suggested for future research on nutrient uptake as it pro-vides a number of benefits, including the ability to (1) separately quantify main channel and storage zone uptake, (2) quantify specific hydrologic and nonhydrologic processes using various model parameters (process separation), (3) estimate uptake velocities and areal uptake rates that are independent of hydrologic effects, and (4) use short-term, non-plateau nutrient additions such that the effects of regeneration and mineralization are minimized. In summary, the transport-based, time-series approach provides a means of estimating traditional measures of nutri-ent uptake (S w , v f , U) while providing additional information on the location and magnitude of uptake (main chan-nel versus storage zone). Application of the transport-based approach to time-series data from Green Creek, Antarctica, indicates that the bulk of nitrate uptake (~74% to 100%) occurred within the main channel where ben-thic uptake by algal mats is a likely process. Substantial uptake (~26%) also occurred in the storage zone of one reach, where uptake is attributed to the microbial community.
    Limnology and oceanography, methods 01/2007; 5. · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 02/2014; 3(6).

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014