Local Government Accountability for Service Delivery in Nigeria

Source: CiteSeer

ABSTRACT This paper is based upon survey work undertaken jointly with Monica Das Gupta and Varun Gauri (Das Gupta, Gauri, and Khemani, 2004). I thank Joshua Adeniyi, Monica Das Gupta, Varun Gauri, Oritseweyimi Ogbe, Oladimeji Oladepo, Muyiwa Sanda, Agnes Soucat, Adedoyin Soyibo, and the Nigeria country team at the World Bank for useful comments and suggestions during the course of this work. Matias Berthelon and Sina Kevin Nazemi provided excellent research assistance. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent. 1.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dissatisfied with centralized approaches to delivering local public services, a large number of countries are decentralizing responsibility for these services to lower-level, locally elected governments. The results have been mixed. This chapter provides a framework for evaluating the benefits and costs, in terms of service delivery, of different approaches to decentralization, based on relationships of accountability between different actors in the delivery chain. Moving from a model of central provision to that of decentralization to local governments introduces a new relationship of accountability - between national and local policymakers - while altering existing relationships, such as that between citizens and elected politicians. Only by examining how these relationships change can we understand why decentralization can, and sometimes cannot, lead to better service delivery. In particular, the various instruments of decentralization - fiscal, administrative, regulatory, market, and financial - can affect the incentives facing service providers, even though they relate only to local policymakers. Likewise, and perhaps more significantly, the incentives facing local and national politicians can have a profound effect on the provision of local services. Finally, the process of implementing decentralization can be as important as the design of the system in influencing service delivery outcomes.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Decentralisation offers significant opportunities to improve government accountability by exerting stronger pressures both from below (demand) and above (supply). The literature contains many examples, however, where the potential has not been realised, partly because decentralisation reforms have often been introduced without thinking through their accountability implications. Even when accountability is taken into account, the efforts tend to emphasise either the supply or the demand side of the equation, but not both. Drawing on the sets of literature on fiscal, administrative and political decentralisation, this article presents a methodology for studying this. Copyright (c) The Authors 2010. Journal compilation (c) 2010 Overseas Development Institute..
    Development Policy Review 05/2010; 28(3):259-293. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00484.x · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients’ satisfaction with health care is an important health outcome which has implications for capacity utilisation. And, in health systems that emphasise the cooperation and involvement of the community, both in terms of resources contribution and management, satisfaction with health care assumes an important dimension in terms of its implication for success of public health programmes. This study, based on administered questionnaires, examines patients/users’ satisfaction with quality attributes of health care services at the primary level facilities in order to provide feedback to health personnel and management for change and learning. The study employs correlation and multivariate regression analysis to determine the quality attributes that determine overall satisfaction with care. Our findings suggest the need to emphasis ‘empathy’ for care providers; and while a reasonable level of physical facilities should be provided, care providers have the task to communicate their technical competence to care seekers to ensure capacity utilisation at the primary level.
    Journal of Health Management 03/2010; 12(1):39-54. DOI:10.1177/097206340901200104


Available from