Article

The Roman High- and Low-Avoidance rat strains differ in fear-potentiated startle and classical aversive conditioning

Psicothema, ISSN 0214-9915, Vol. 21, Nº. 1, 2009, pags. 27-32
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Las cepas de ratas Roman de alta y baja evitación difieren en respuesta de sobresalto potenciada por miedo y en condicionamiento clásico aversivo. Las sublíneas suizas de ratas Romanas «High»- (RHA/Verh) y «Low»-(RLA/Verh) «Avoidance» han sido seleccionadas genéticamente, desde 1972, en función de su excelente (RHA) o extremadamente pobre adquisición de la tarea de evitación activa en dos sentidos. Cepas consanguíneas (RHA-I y RLA-I), derivadas de las dos líneas anteriores, se mantienen en nuestro laboratorio desde 1997. En comparación con la cepa RHA-I, la cepa RLA-I muestra incrementos en las respuestas hormonales al estrés, así como en conductas de ansiedad/miedo en una variedad de pruebas y variables conductuales incondicionadas. Hasta la fecha, las cepas de ratas Romanas no han sido comparadas en procedimientos de condicionamiento clásico de miedo a contextos o estímulos discretos. El presente trabajo tuvo como objetivo comparar ambas en 1) dos procedimientos de medida de la respuesta de sobresalto potenciada por miedo; y, 2) en un procedimiento de condicionamiento clásico de miedo (petrificación condicionada). Los resultados indican que las ratas RLA-I muestran niveles mayores de condicionamiento de miedo (respuesta de sobresalto y respuesta de petrificación) que las RHA-I, reforzando así los perfiles diferenciales de ansiedad/miedo de las dos cepas.

0 Followers
 · 
88 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To characterize learning/memory profiles for the first time in the genetically heterogeneous NIH-HS rat stock, and to examine whether these are associated with anxiety, we evaluated NIH-HS rats for spatial learning/memory in the Morris Water Maze (MWM) and in the following anxiety/fear tests: the elevated zero-maze (ZM; unconditioned anxiety), a context-conditioned fear test and the acquisition of two-way active avoidance (conditioned anxiety). NIH-HS rats were compared with the Roman High- (RHA-I) and Low-Avoidance (RLA-I) rat strains, given the well-known differences between the Roman strains/lines in anxiety-related behavior and in spatial learning/memory. The results show that: (i) As expected, RLA-I rats were more anxious in the ZM test, displayed more frequent context-conditioned freezing episodes and fewer avoidances than RHA-I rats. (ii) Scores of NIH-HS rats in these tests/tasks mostly fell in between those of the Roman rat strains, and were usually closer to the values of the RLA-I strain. (iii) Pigmented NIH-HS (only a small part of NIH-HS rats were albino) rats were the best spatial learners and displayed better spatial memory than the other three (RHA-I, RLA-I and NIH-HS albino) groups. (iv) Albino NIH-HS and RLA-I rats also showed better learning/memory than the RHA-I strain. (v) Within the NIH-HS stock, the most anxious rats in the ZM test presented the best learning and/or memory efficiency (regardless of pigmentation). In summary, NIH-HS rats display a high performance in spatial learning/memory tasks and a passive coping strategy when facing conditioned conflict situations. In addition, unconditioned anxiety in NIH-HS rats predicts better spatial learning/memory. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Physiology & Behavior 03/2015; 144. DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.03.003 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Roman low- and high-avoidance rat strains (RLA-I vs RHA-I) have been bidirectionally selected and bred according to their performance in the two-way active avoidance response in the shuttle-box test. Numerous studies have reported a pronounced divergence in emotionality between the two rat strains including differences in novelty seeking, anxiety, stress coping, and susceptibility to addictive substances. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms behind these divergent phenotypes are not known. Here, we determined impulsivity using the 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time (5-CSRT) task and levels of serotonin transporter (SERT), 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A receptor binding using highly specific radioligands ((3)H-escitalopram, (3)H-MDL100907 and (3)H-WAY100635) and mGlu2/3 receptor binding ((3)H-LY341495) using receptor autoradiography in fronto-cortical sections from RLA-I (n=8) & RHA-I (n=8) male rats. In the more impulsive RHA-I rats, 5-HT2A, 5-HT1A and SERT binding in frontal cortex were significantly higher compared to RLA-I rats. In contrast, mGlu2/3 receptor binding was decreased by 40% in RHA-I rats compared to RLA-I rats. To differentiate between mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptor protein levels, these were further studied using western blotting, which showed non-detectable levels of mGlu2 receptor protein in RHA rats, while no differences were observed for mGlu3 receptor protein levels. Collectively, these data show general congenital differences in the serotonergic system and a pronounced difference in mGlu2 receptor protein levels. We suggest that the differences in the serotonergic system may mediate some of the phenotypic characteristics in this strain such as hyper-impulsivity and susceptibility to drug addiction.
    Neuroscience 01/2014; 263. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.063 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    World Journal of Neuroscience 01/2014; 04(03):261-278. DOI:10.4236/wjns.2014.43030