Los impactos ambientales de la acuicultura, causas y efectos

Vector plus: miscelánea científico - cultural, ISSN 1134-5306, Nº. 28, 2006, pags. 89-98 01/2006;
Source: OAI


La rápida expansión de la acuicultura en los últimos años ha generado una creciente preocupación por las externalidades que esta actividad puede provocar en el medio ambiente. Se hace necesario el desarrollo de herramientas que nos permitan una correcta gestión de esta actividad, para que llegue a ser sostenible. En el presente trabajo se expone una visión general sobre la situación actual de la acuicultura, sus impactos ambientales y las interacciones con otras actividades.

Download full-text


Available from: Miguel Rabassó, May 31, 2015
1 Follower
403 Reads
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The environmental impact of aquaculture, and its sustainability Spain is a major aquacultural producer in Europe, and its sea cage production has been progressively in- creasing. The present study proposes a decalogue for action in the Spanish aquaculture industry, in order to avoid interfering with other marine activities. After reviewing the main impacts of aquaculture, we propose a protocol to identify the areas appropriate for aquaculture, as well as a protocol for the environmental man- agement of these firms. Aquaculture will be sustainable if it is well planned, and production is properly man- aged.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aggregations of wild fish were counted around 9 floating sea-cage fish farms along a 300 km stretch of the Spanish coastline in the south-western Mediterranean Sea. Each fish farm cultivated Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax in 6 to 16 floating sea cages between 10 m and 7.4 km from the coast. During September and October 2001, assemblages of fish were counted on 3 separate days at each of 9 farms. Six 5 min rapid visual counts using SCUBA and covering 11 250 m3 were performed within each farm complex and at open water control sites 200 m distant from farms. Abundance (52 to 2837×), biomass (2.8 to 1126×) and number of species (1.6 to 14×) were greater in fish farm counts than control counts at all locations. Twenty-seven species were recorded at fish farms, with 2 families, Sparidae (12 species) and Carangidae (4 species), being particularly abundant. Over 85% of farm-associated fish were of adult size. Assemblages of wild fish differed greatly between farms separated by 10s to 100s of km, although there was some evidence to suggest that similar assemblages occur at farms separated by 100s of m to several km. Abundance, biomass and number of species differed among fish farms, with all 3 variables negatively correlated with distance of farms from shore and positively correlated with size of farms. Limited variability of wild fish assemblages and abundance of the dominant taxa at each farm among times sampled indicated some degree of temporal stability on a scale of several weeks. Due to the strong aggregative effect of fish farms, possible residence of fishes for periods of weeks to months and the prohibition of fishing within farm leasehold areas, we suggest that coastal sea-cage fish farms may act as small (up to 160 000 m2), pelagic marine protected areas (MPAs). Furthermore, at farms where wild fish are abundant, ecological interactions that may influence both wild fish stocks and the impact of farms must be considered.
    Marine Ecology Progress Series 11/2002; 242(242):237-252. DOI:10.3354/meps242237 · 2.62 Impact Factor