Cirugía laparoscópica hepática y pancreática

Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra (Impact Factor: 0.56). 01/2005; 28. DOI: 10.4321/S1137-66272005000600007
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT El desarrollo de la cirugía laparoscópica incluye también los procedimientos más complejos de la cirugía abdominal como los que afectan al hígado y al páncreas. Desde la laparoscopia diagnóstica, acompañada de ecografía laparoscópica, hasta las resecciones mayores hepáticas o pancreáticas, el abordaje laparoscópico se ha ido extendiendo y abarca hoy la práctica totalidad de los procedimientos quirúrgicos en patología hepatopancreática. Sin olvidar nunca que el objetivo de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva no es un mejor resultado estético sino la disminución de las complicaciones postoperatorias, es innegable que el abordaje laparoscópico ha supuesto un gran beneficio para los pacientes en todo tipo de cirugías excepto, por el momento, en el caso de las grandes resecciones como la hepatectomía izquierda o derecha o las resecciones de segmentos VII y VIII. La cirugía pancreática ha tenido un gran desarrollo con la laparoscopia, especialmente en el campo de la pancreatectomía distal por tumores quísticos y neuroendocrinos, en los que el abordaje de elección es laparoscópico. Igualmente juega un importante papel la laparoscopia, junto con la ecolaparoscopia, en la estadificación de tumores pancreáticos, previa a la cirugía abierta o para indicar el tratamiento adecuado. En los próximos años, es de esperar que el desarrollo siga siendo exponencial, y, unido a los avances en robótica, permitirá asistir todavía a un mayor impacto del abordaje laparoscópico en el campo de la cirugía hepática y pancreática. Palabras clave. Laparoscopia. Cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Cirugía hepática laparoscópica. Cirugía pancreática laparoscópica. Resección laparoscópica.

Download full-text


Available from: Fernando Pardo, Jul 06, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In most patients with pancreatic cancer, the tumor is unresectable. Nonoperative methods for palliation of jaundice, duodenal obstruction, and pain currently are being developed. Preoperative assessment of resectability of the tumor is becoming more and more important to avoid unnecessary operations. The aim of this study was to compare computed tomography (CT) and laparoscopy with special reference to the additive role of the latter technique in predicting unresectability of pancreatic cancers.Study Design: Sixty patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer were assessed prospectively with both CT and laparoscopy. On the basis of metastatic spread or signs of vascular involvement, the radiologist and the laparoscopist independently reported the tumors as probably unresectable or resectable.Results: The predictive value for unresectability was 100% for both CT and laparoscopy. Sensitivity in predicting unresectability was 69% for both techniques, and the corresponding figure for specificity was 100%. When CT and laparoscopy were evaluated together, an improvement in sensitivity to 87% was observed (p < 0.05). Separately, CT and laparoscopy correctly predicted resectability in only 30% and 38% of the patients, respectively. The presence of liver metastases was overlooked by CT in 13 of 32 patients (40%). Every fourth patient who was found to have unresectable tumor at CT was falsely classified as resectable by the laparoscopist, leading to unnecessary laparotomies. On the other hand, 9 of 24 patients (38%) with resectable disease at CT were deemed unresectable at the subsequent laparoscopy.Conclusions: Laparoscopy and CT independently and reliably predicted unresectability of pancreatic cancer, but the methods were inaccurate in forecasting resectability. The results suggest that CT examination should be done in patients who are candidates for attempted curative surgical procedures, whereas laparoscopy should be restricted to Those Judged resectable at CT.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 01/1998; DOI:10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00128-2 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery should be considered as an advanced laparoscopic procedure and should be performed only in institutions with experience in pancreatic surgery by a team with advanced laparoscopic skills. This review discusses the current status of the laparoscopic approach for inflammatory pancreatic diseases and for benign-appearing pancreatic tumors. Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to be beneficial in patients with inflammatory tumors located in the body-tail of the pancreas for chronic pancreatitis. Furthermore, patients with pancreatic pseudocysts may be managed with laparoscopic internal drainage (to the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum). Also, laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy has been used with success in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. At present, laparoscopic surgery has proven to be beneficial in patients with cystic pancreatic neoplasms and neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. The laparoscopic pancreatic approach was recently shown to be feasible and safe. Laparoscopy may contribute to reduced operation time and perioperative blood loss, and reduces surgical stress because of developments in devices, improvements in procedures, and advanced techniques.
    Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery 09/2005; 390(4):342-54. DOI:10.1007/s00423-005-0556-5 · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current laparoscopic stapling technology still cannot prevent bile leakage (<55%) along the resection margin. A new staple line reinforcement technique was used in the present case. This technique incorporates an absorbable polymer membrane into the stapler system, such that it buttresses the transected solid organ. The objectives of this novel procedure are to decrease hemorrhage at the staple line and to prevent bile duct leakage after liver resection. A 47-year-old man followed for status post biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch presented with epigastric pain. On imaging, he was found to have a lesion in segment 2-3 of the left lobe of the liver, which measured at least 3 cm in diameter. He was admitted to the hospital to undergo a laparoscopic left lateral liver resection. This procedure involved laparoscopic ultrasonography of the liver and transection of the left liver lobe with endoscopic linear staplers. The staple height of 3.5, 60 mm long, reinforced with an absorbable polymer membrane was used for liver transection to catch the portal branches. This required multiple firings in the liver parenchyma and additional division of some tissue using the Harmonic scalpel. The larger branch in the middle of segment 2-3 and the left hepatic vein were both transected with the novel staple line reinforcement technique. Bleeding or any bile leakage in this area could not be visualized. No drains were left. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated, and he was discharged on postoperative day 3. Pathology results showed a cavernous hemangioma of 4.5 cm in diameter. Staple line reinforcement with the absorbable polymer membrane has the potential to decrease staple line hemorrhage and bile leakage.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 04/2005; 9(3):360-4. DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2004.07.016 · 2.39 Impact Factor