Article

Ecografía tridimensional en la valoración del cuello y cuerpo uterino

Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Clínica Universitaria. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Navarra. Correspondencia; Juan Luis Alcázar Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Clínica Universitaria Avda. Pío XII, 36 31008, Pamplona
Revista de medicina, Vol. 49, Nº. 4, 2005, pags. 28-31 01/2005;
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT La ecografía constituye un arma fundamental en el diagnóstico de la patología benigna de útero. Sin embargo, presenta una serie de limitaciones. Recientemente la ecografía tridimensional ha sido introducida en la práctica clínica. Este tipo de ecografía elimina algunas de las limitaciones de la ecografía bidimensional. En el presente artículo revisaremos los datos disponibles sobre lo que aporta la ecografía tridimensional en la evaluación de la patología del cuerpo y cérvix uterino.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a study to assess real-time ultrasonography (US) as an alternative to hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency, 61 women underwent US immediately before hysteroscopy/laparoscopy. Saline was instilled into the uterus to provide contrast during US. The findings were compared with surgical and preoperative HSG findings. With surgical findings as the standard, US was as accurate (sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%) as HSG (sensitivity 98%, specificity 92%) in demonstrating uterine abnormalities and provided a more complete assessment of the abnormality. US was as accurate (sensitivity 100%, specificity 91%) as HSG (sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%) in demonstrating the presence of tubal patency but less accurate in establishing which tubes were patent. Thus real-time US with fluid instillation provides an accurate alternative to HSG in screening for uterine abnormalities and tubal patency.
    Fertility and Sterility 12/1986; 46(5):828-32. · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal women. Systematic review of common diagnostic imaging tests. Relevant papers were identified through electronic searching of MEDLINE (1980 to July 2001) and EMBASE (1980 to July 2001) and manual searching of a bibliography of primary and review articles. Studies were selected if accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy was compared with a reference standard and included data that could be abstracted into a two-by-two table in order to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by at least two independent reviewers. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating positive and negative likelihood ratios for all intrauterine pathologies, submucous fibroids and endometrial hyperplasia. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant heterogeneity was present between the likelihood ratios for studies of transvaginal ultrasound. A positive test result with sonohysterography diagnosed submucous fibroids with a pooled likelihood ratio of 29.7 (17.8, 49.6). A positive test result with hysteroscopy diagnosed submucous fibroids with a pooled likelihood ratio of 29.4 (13.4, 65.3), and any intrauterine pathology with a pooled likelihood ratio of 7.7 (4.3, 13.7). A negative test result with hysteroscopy for diagnosing any intrauterine pathology had a pooled likelihood ratio of 0.07 (0.04, 0.15). Although there was considerable variability present between the studies, all three diagnostic tests were moderately accurate in detecting intrauterine pathology. However, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy performed better than transvaginal ultrasound in detecting submucous fibroids.
    Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 07/2003; 82(6):493-504. · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography (3D SIS) and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and classification of submucous uterine fibroids. This was a prospective double-blind study of 49 women who presented with a history of menorrhagia, diagnosed on non-enhanced two-dimensional ultrasonography with submucous fibroids. Fibroids were classified on 3D SIS according to the proportion of fibroid contained within the endometrial cavity, using the European Society of Hysteroscopy Classification of Submucous Fibroids. These results were then compared with the findings at diagnostic hysteroscopy. A total of 61 submucous fibroids was identified in 49 symptomatic women. Diagnostic hysteroscopy confirmed these findings in all cases. There was agreement between the two methods in 11/12 cases of Type 0 fibroids (92%), 34/37 (92%) of Type I fibroids and 9/12 (75%) of Type II fibroids. The overall level of agreement was good with a kappa value of 0.80. There is a good overall agreement between 3D SIS and diagnostic hysteroscopy in classification of submucous fibroids. Agreement is better in cases where a greater proportion of the fibroid is contained within the uterine cavity.
    Human Reproduction 02/2005; 20(1):253-7. · 4.67 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
80 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014