Distracción mandibular y articulación temporomandibular

Revista Espanola de Cirugia Oral y Maxilofacial 01/2004; DOI: 10.4321/S1130-05582004000400001
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Los pacientes con deformidades craneofaciales requieren generalmente multiples y, a veces, complejos procedimientos quirurgicos para reconstruir tejidos blandos y duros alterados. Un avance importante en cirugía reconstructiva es el alargamiento de la mandibula por distracción que tiene la ventaja de una cirugía menos agresiva que determinados tipos de osteotomías. Con esta técnica una osteotomía bicortical se hace en distintas zonas de la mandibula colocandose el distractor hasta alcanzar los efectos deseados. Aunque las fuerzas aplicadas se han mostrado eficaces para alargar la mandíbula, sus efectos en segmentos proximales y distales, incluyendo la articulación temporomandibular no han sido analizados sistemáticamente. En este artículo se repasa trabajos experimentales y clínicos en los que se detalla la relación entre distracción mandibular y articulación temporomandibular. Patients with severe craniofacial abnormalities often require multiple and complex surgical procedures to reconstruct maldeveloped hard and soft tissues of the maxillofacial complex. An important advance in reconstructive surgery is mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction, which takes advantage to be less agressive surgery than some osteotomies. With this technique, a bicortical osteotomy is made at the angle of the deficient mandible, and an expansion appliance is placed across the osteotomy line. Although the applied forces have been shown to lengthen the mandible effectively in the region of the application, their effects on the proximal and distal mandibular segments, including the temporomandibular joint region, have not been analyzed systematically. In this article, we study several experimental and clinical papers where it describes the relationship between mandibular distraction and temporomandibular joint.

1 Follower
50 Reads
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 12/1991; 2(3). DOI:10.1097/00001665-199112000-00028 · 0.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term effects of transverse symphyseal distraction osteogenesis (DO) on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) symptoms, periodontal health, tooth vitality, and nerve injury after surgery. Twenty-three patients were treated with symphyseal DO during a 4-year period. Fifteen patients were available for follow-up from 7 to 45 months postoperatively (ave, 24.5 months). The patients were clinically evaluated for TMJ symptoms, periodontal pocket formation, tooth vitality and mobility, crestal bone loss, and attached gingival tissue changes. Radiographs of the mandibular anterior teeth were used to evaluate for periodontal bone loss, periapical lesions, or widening of the periodontal ligament (PDL). Preoperatively, 47% of the patients had TMJ symptoms. No patient had symptom worsening or developed new symptoms postoperatively. Five patients' TMJ symptoms improved, and 3 experienced complete resolution of symptoms. No periodontal bone loss or soft tissue recession were evident. Tooth vitality was maintained in 13 patients. Two patients developed Class II mobility of 1 mandibular central incisor, 1 patient had tooth pain and a widened PDL adjacent to the osteotomy/corticotomy site, and 1 patient experienced mental nerve paresthesia. DO can be used to treat transverse discrepancies of the mandible with limited morbidity.
    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 01/2000; 57(12):1419-25; discussion 1426. DOI:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90723-1 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Distraction osteogenesis of the facial skeleton has provided both a powerful tool to those who are interested in studying the biology of bone and has added a powerful technique to the armamentarium of surgeons who treat facial disfi gurement. The application of bone distraction to the facial skeleton has been largely derived from prior work in the lower extremity, and the fundamental biologic concepts of distraction osteogenesis must be thoroughly understood before the extension of this work to the facial skeleton can be consistently applied successfully. Bone distraction initiates a complex biologic process that induces biosynthetic pathways to form additional soft tissue and bone. The application of this principle to the facial skeleton must also take into consideration specifi c characteristics of the face and its anatomy. Surgeons traditionally view the face in three separate domains: 1) the upper face – from the eyes to the top of the head, 2) the mid-face – from the upper teeth to the eyes, and 3) the lower face – from the lower teeth to the neck. Each of these three domains of the facial skeleton has its specifi c biological requirements and constraints, and each domain requires different considerations for fi xation of bone devices and for the design of linkage systems. In its most elementary form, the bone distraction device must meet two essential criteria: 1) provide rigid fixation in three dimensions of the bone on either side of the bone osteotomy site (or distraction gap) and 2) provide for a linkage system that will allow the two bone components to separate gradually at a set rate (usually approximately one millimeter per day). This chapter will briefl y review the fundamental biology of distraction osteogenesis, review its development in each of the three facial domains and review the inherent biological constraints and requirements of each of these areas. KeywordsBone–face–distraction osteogenesis–craniofacial–surgery
    12/2007: pages 199-224;
Show more


50 Reads
Available from