Autoeficacia en el control de la conducta de ingesta: Adaptación al castellano de la Eating Self-Efficacy Scale

Psicothema, ISSN 0214-9915, Vol. 15, Nº. 1, 2003, pags. 36-40
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT El presente estudio analiza la estructura factorial y las propiedades psicométricas de la Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES; Glynn y Ruderman, 1986), un instrumento desarrollado para medir la autoeficacia en relación a la ingesta alimentaria. En el estudio han participado 298 sujetos distribuidos en dos grupos: con normopeso (n= 193) y con exceso de peso (n= 105). Los análisis factoriales exploratorios apoyan la existencia de una estructura bidimensional, con los factores Afecto Negativo y Circunstancias Socialmente Aceptables. El análisis factorial confirmatorio corrobora este modelo de dos factores con una muestra independiente (N= 345). La escala y sus subdimensiones muestran un elevado nivel de consistencia interna. Por último, se han encontrado asociaciones entre las puntuaciones a la ESES y otras variables con las que hipotéticamente estarían relacionadas.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Weight Efficacy Life-Style Questionnaire (WEL), an instrument developed to measure self-efficacy in relation to food intake. A total of 292 Spanish persons participated, from three groups: clinical group, overweight group, and normal-weight group. The findings showed evidence of three situational factors (Negative Emotions, Social Pressure, and Physical Discomfort). The confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the three-factor model on an independent sample (N = 345). The results show a high degree of internal consistency of the scores of WEL. Significant correlations were found between the WEL scores and other variables that were hypothesized would be related to them. Significant differences on self-efficacy scores were found between some of the groups. The scores of WEL also significantly correlated with the Eating Self-Efficacy Scale scores. Finally, results are discussed and future research directions are suggested.
    Educational and Psychological Measurement 06/2002; 62(3):539-555. · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Achieving a preventive attitude is the first step in eliminating cancer risk behaviours. This cross-sectional study evaluated the attitude towards the European Code against Cancer, in 3,031 relatives of cancer patients. The study looked for keys to improve attitude by means of educational interventions. Attitude was evaluated using a questionnaire with 63 items and a Likert's scale. Measured from -2 to +2 , the mean score was 0.905 [0.894 - 0.971]. Five per cent had a mean score under 0.38 and another 5% over 1.46. A multivariate analysis found that age, sex and level of education were significantly associated with attitude: young men with a low cultural level were those with the lowest preventive attitude. The family history of cancer was not associated with attitude. Educational interventions should modify the perceived advantages of smoking and drinking, and the disadvantages related to preventive diet and sun and workplace protection.
    Psicothema 09/2006; 18(3):478-84. · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents the development and validation of a weight control selfefficacy inventory measuring self-efficacy perceptions in three areas of weight control –feeding style, influence of external stimuli on over-eating behaviors and physical activity patterns. Following an exhaustive literature review, an opinion interview and consultation with 4 experts in the area, 120 items were built. The statistical item analysis in a sample of 193 students allowed us to sort out 37 items out of the original pool. Then, reliability and validity analyses were performed in a sample of 439 students. Factor analysis resulted in 3 factors explaining 44.083% of the total variance. Satisfactory internal consistencies were found for each factor (.88, .91 and .88 respectively). Results are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.
    Clínica y Salud. 05/2007; 18(1):45-56.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014