¿Es fiable el test del aliento para el diagnóstico de infección por Helicobacter pylori en atención primaria?

Atención Primaria (Impact Factor: 0.96). 01/2003; DOI: 10.1016/S0212-6567(03)79144-6
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Objetivo. Evaluar la fiabilidad del test del aliento con urea 13C en atención primaria para el diagnóstico de infección por Helicobacter pylori (Hp). Diseño. Estudio descriptivo, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Emplazamiento. Área urbana perteneciente al Centro de Salud Actur Sur de Zaragoza, con participación del Hospital Miguel Servet. Participantes. Se incluyó a 87 pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de dispepsia funcional. A todos ellos se les realizó un test de aliento con urea 13C, así como una gastroscopia con toma de muestras para histología y test de ureasa rápida. Mediciones principales. Se valoraron edad, sexo y la presencia de positividad o negatividad de infección por Hp en la histología, el test de ureasa y el test del aliento, considerando la histología y el test de ureasa pruebas gold standard para esta medición, por lo que se exigía que el resultado en ambas fuera positivo o negativo para considerarlo no equívoco. Resultados. Se excluyeron 2 casos por resultados equívocos. El 77,6% (66/85) fue positivo por histología y test de ureasa, de los que un 92,4% (61/66) resultó positivo al test del aliento. La sensibilidad de esta prueba fue del 92% y la especificidad del 100%. Conclusiones. El test del aliento en atención primaria tiene un alto valor diagnóstico de infección por Hp, pudiendo evitar así en algunos casos la realización de técnicas más invasivas como la gastroscopia.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While widely used in research, the 1991 Rome criteria for the gastroduodenal disorders, especially symptom subgroups in dyspepsia, remain contentious. After a comprehensive literature search, a consensus-based approach was applied, supplemented by input from international experts who reviewed the report. Three functional gastroduodenal disorders are defined. Functional dyspepsia is persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen; evidence of organic disease likely to explain the symptoms is absent, including at upper endoscopy. Discomfort refers to a subjective, negative feeling that may be characterized by or associated with a number of non-painful symptoms including upper abdominal fullness, early satiety, bloating, or nausea. A dyspepsia subgroup classification is proposed for research purposes, based on the predominant (most bothersome) symptom: (a) ulcer-like dyspepsia when pain (from mild to severe) is the predominant symptom, and (b) dysmotility-like dyspepsia when discomfort (not pain) is the predominant symptom. This classification is supported by recent evidence suggesting that predominant symptoms, but not symptom clusters, identify subgroups with distinct underlying pathophysiological disturbances and responses to treatment. Aerophagia is an unusual complaint characterized by air swallowing that is objectively observed and troublesome repetitive belching. Functional vomiting refers to frequent episodes of recurrent vomiting that is not self-induced nor medication induced, and occurs in the absence of eating disorders, major psychiatric diseases, abnormalities in the gut or central nervous system, or metabolic diseases that can explain the symptom. The current classification requires careful validation but the criteria should be of value in future research.
    Gut 10/1999; 45 Suppl 2:II37-42. · 10.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When discussing epidemiological data we must consider the tools of assessment and the selection of the target population. As a rule, well designed population studies give us an accurate but crude picture of what is going on. What we gain in details with a more elaborate method we often lose when we want to generalise. Population studies in Göteborg have shown that the prevalence of dyspepsia is the same among men and women in the age groups between 30-70 years. After the age of 50 dyspepsia is less common. With the methods described, it was not possible to make a clear distinction between the ulcer dyspepsia group and the non-ulcer dyspepsia group except for smoking (which was more common in the ulcer dyspepsia group).
    Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement 02/1985; 109:29-33.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the prevalence of dyspepsia in the adult population of Great Britain and to describe the clinical features, treatment, effect of dyspepsia on daily lives and perceptions of peptic ulcer disease. Cross-sectional survey of the adult population using structured questionnaires. Subjects interviewed at more than 150 sampling points in England, Scotland and Wales in November 1994. A representative sample of the adult population comprising 2112 subjects, aged 16 years or more. The prevalence of dyspepsia in the adult population and the frequency of various characteristics in dyspeptic subjects. The prevalence of dyspepsia was 40%. Upper abdominal pain and heartburn were the most frequently reported symptoms. Solitary symptoms were uncommon and there was frequent overlap between 'ulcer-like' and 'reflux-like' dyspepsia. Forty-six per cent of dyspeptic subjects reported moderate or severe symptoms. More than half of symptomatic subjects took medication and 22% had visited their GP during the previous year. Overall, 2% of the survey sample had been absent from work due to dyspepsia. Awareness of the factors precipitating or aggravating peptic ulcer disease was poor, particularly in relation to anti-inflammatory drugs. The present study emphasizes the magnitude of the problem of dyspepsia in the adult population of Great Britain. The survey also shows that the public in general, and patients in particular, require more information if they are to avoid factors known to damage the upper alimentary tract.
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 03/1996; 10(1):83-9. · 4.55 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Sep 23, 2014

Fernando Gomollón