Initiatives and outcomes of quality management implementation across industries

Department of Shipping and Transport Logistics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Department of Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Omega (Impact Factor: 3.19). 04/2003; DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00021-5
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00021-5 This paper sets out to explore the quality initiatives of various industries and examine the links between quality management implementation and quality outcomes. We use the scenario in Hong Kong as a first step in addressing these research inquiries. Using Black and Porter's instrument (Decision Sci. 27 (1996) 1) and the various perceived performance measures representing quality management implementation and quality outcomes respectively, we conducted a mail survey to collect data from over 1000 companies with operational quality management systems and received 304 valid responses for data analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data and the results are consistent with our prediction that the differences in quality initiatives by industry types affect the levels of quality management implementation and quality outcomes in different industries. In particular, we found that significant contrast exists between public utilities/service industries and manufacturing/construction industries, with the former group having a higher level of quality management implementation and achieving better quality outcomes. The emphases that they placed on their quality management implementation also seem to differ. Implications of the results are discussed and suggestions for further research on quality management and implementation are offerred. Author name used in this publication: Kee-hung Lai Author name used in this publication: T. C. E. Cheng

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Productivity alone does not depict the overall performance of a manufacturing system. Frequent changes in the design and need for continuously improving product quality require high degree of automation and flexibility of the manufacturing system. Thus, productivity, quality and flexibility have become critical measures of total manufacturing performance of a production system for justifying the investment. These three measures are quantitatively defined and their combined effect has been evaluated on the manufacturing performance index of the system. A mathematical model for performance index has been developed. Further the relationship among productivity, quality and flexibility has been investigated and a method has been proposed to serve as decision support to management.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 01/2012; 93(1).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Manufacturing and service industries have developed and validated techniques for identifying critical success factors related to the measurement of deploying quality initiatives. However, little research has been undertaken to examine if these techniques can be applied to UK Construction related SMEs. This noted omission has been the motivation for this research project. The main aims of this paper are twofold; firstly, to identify the major constructs of Total Quality Management (TQM) and refine the scales for measuring the constructs, secondly to empirically validate these revised scales. Through a survey of 63 UK Construction related SMEs, this study empirically refines and validates 10 constructs for TQM in construction. The constructs refined in this study are compared with other major quality measurement instruments. The study reports on the operational framework of Total Quality-Self Monitoring and Assessment Rating Tool (TQ-SMART) which can be used to examine the levels of quality management initiatives within UK construction related SMEs. The findings indicate that TQ-SMART is both reliable and valid. This paper concludes by presenting the refined instrument which contributes to the performance improvement tools and techniques as advocated by the Egan (1998; 2002) reports and contributes to the TQM literature by validating the direct and indirect relations among the TQM practices on organisational performance. Keywords: Total Quality Management (TQM); SME's; Questionnaires; Validation
    20th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM ) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland; 09/2004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within the operations management literature, quality management (QM) has been one of the most popular research areas over the last two decades. QM is an integrative management philosophy aimed at the continuous improvement of performance. Consequently, the impact of QM practices on firm performance has been the subject of constant interest and challenge among researchers. Numerous empirical studies have attempted to investigate QM practice–performance relationships in different contexts. Based on an extensive review of the literature, this paper attempts to reflect the research stream on the impact of QM on firm performance and to provide insights for future research. For this purpose, the reviewed QM literature is organised and classified along three main themes: QM practices, performance and QM–performance relationships.
    International Journal of Production Research 09/2013; 51(18). · 1.32 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 16, 2014