Article

Initiatives and outcomes of quality management implementation across industries

Department of Shipping and Transport Logistics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Department of Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Omega (Impact Factor: 3.63). 04/2003; DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00021-5
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00021-5 This paper sets out to explore the quality initiatives of various industries and examine the links between quality management implementation and quality outcomes. We use the scenario in Hong Kong as a first step in addressing these research inquiries. Using Black and Porter's instrument (Decision Sci. 27 (1996) 1) and the various perceived performance measures representing quality management implementation and quality outcomes respectively, we conducted a mail survey to collect data from over 1000 companies with operational quality management systems and received 304 valid responses for data analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data and the results are consistent with our prediction that the differences in quality initiatives by industry types affect the levels of quality management implementation and quality outcomes in different industries. In particular, we found that significant contrast exists between public utilities/service industries and manufacturing/construction industries, with the former group having a higher level of quality management implementation and achieving better quality outcomes. The emphases that they placed on their quality management implementation also seem to differ. Implications of the results are discussed and suggestions for further research on quality management and implementation are offerred. Author name used in this publication: Kee-hung Lai Author name used in this publication: T. C. E. Cheng

1 Bookmark
 · 
173 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose - The purpose of this study is to measure the perceptions of both architects and contractors regarding the factors affecting quality in the Jordanian housing sector. Design/Methodology/Approach - Twenty quality factors were identified from the literature and ranked by respondents. Next, The weighted indexes for importance and frequency of quality variables were calculated. The quality variables were ranked according to their severity index. Finally, the Principal Component and Factor Analysis methodology was employed to arrive at the most prominent factors. Findings - Major factors affecting quality were human resource management, customer satisfaction, uses of technology and supplier management. Although both samples of architects and contractors chose the factor "Uses of technology" as a common factor, the t –test showed statistically significant differences in the means of both samples. Originality/Value - This study's findings build on prior research conducted in different countries. The major factors identified in this study are compared to other similar study's findings, thereby, adding to the available literature on factors affecting quality in the housing sector in developing countries.
    International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 04/2014; 7(2):175-188.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the various factors important for total quality management implementation in various manufacturing organizations and to assess their relevance for Indian manufacturing organizations. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review was conducted for important factors and a survey approach was used to collect relevant data from industries. Further data were used to establish a model. Findings – It is shown that customer focus must be the prime objective for various industries to achieve total quality management. All the factors must be used systematically to achieve total quality management (TQM) and it can be done efficiently by using a model having four phases to implement TQM. Originality/value – The paper will be useful for manufacturing as well as service industries that are in the starting phase of TQM implementation or have already failed to implement TQM at their works.
    TQM Journal 10/2009; 21(6):607-622.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Manufacturing and service industries have developed and validated techniques for identifying critical success factors related to the measurement of deploying quality initiatives. However, little research has been undertaken to examine if these techniques can be applied to UK Construction related SMEs. This noted omission has been the motivation for this research project. The main aims of this paper are twofold; firstly, to identify the major constructs of Total Quality Management (TQM) and refine the scales for measuring the constructs, secondly to empirically validate these revised scales. Through a survey of 63 UK Construction related SMEs, this study empirically refines and validates 10 constructs for TQM in construction. The constructs refined in this study are compared with other major quality measurement instruments. The study reports on the operational framework of Total Quality-Self Monitoring and Assessment Rating Tool (TQ-SMART) which can be used to examine the levels of quality management initiatives within UK construction related SMEs. The findings indicate that TQ-SMART is both reliable and valid. This paper concludes by presenting the refined instrument which contributes to the performance improvement tools and techniques as advocated by the Egan (1998; 2002) reports and contributes to the TQM literature by validating the direct and indirect relations among the TQM practices on organisational performance. Keywords: Total Quality Management (TQM); SME's; Questionnaires; Validation
    20th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM ) Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland; 09/2004

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
320 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014