"Hipótesis no comprobadas de la mercadotecnia política"

ABSTRACT Guadalajara El artículo hace un recuento crítico de las hipótesis centrales de la mercadotecnia política, como son el poder predictivo de las encuestas de preferencias electorales, el poder persuasivo de los debates televisados de los candidatos, las campañas mediáticas y el impacto del dinero en la decisión del voto de los ciudadanos. Se arguye que, en muchos casos, estas hipótesis no pueden ser contrastadas con la realidad y que en la política se presentan muchos casos anómalos que contradicen estos planteamientos teóricos.

Download full-text


Available from: Andrés Valdez Zepeda, Sep 27, 2015
24 Reads
  • Source
    American Political Science Association 12/1982; 76(4). DOI:10.2307/1962976 · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Analyses of the persuasive effects of media exposure outside the laboratory have generally produced negative results. I attribute such nonfindings in part to carelessness regarding the inferential consequences of measurement error and in part to limitations of research design. In an analysis of opinion change during the 1980 presidential campaign, adjusting for measurement error produces several strong media exposure effects, especially for network television news. Adjusting for measurement error also makes preexisting opinions look much more stable, suggesting that the new information absorbed via media exposure must be about three times as distinctive as has generally been supposed in order to account for observed patterns of opinion change.
    American Political Science Review 06/1993; 87(02). DOI:10.2307/2939040 · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A disturbingly cautionary tale, Is Anyone Responsible? anchors with powerful evidence suspicions about the way in which television has impoverished political discourse in the United States and at the same time molds American political consciousness. It is essential reading for media critics, psychologists, political analysts, and all the citizens who want to be sure that their political opinions are their own. "Not only does it provide convincing evidence for particular effects of media fragmentation, but it also explores some of the specific mechanisms by which television works its damage. . . . Here is powerful additional evidence for those of us who like to flay television for its contributions to the trivialization of public discourse and the erosion of democratic accountability."—William A. Gamson, Contemporary Sociology "Iyengar's book has substantial merit. . . . [His] experimental methods offer a precision of measurement that media effects research seldom attains. I believe, moreover, that Iyengar's notion of framing effects is one of the truly important theoretical concepts to appear in recent years."—Thomas E. Patterson, American Political Science Review
    American Political Science Association 12/1992; DOI:10.2307/1964379 · 3.05 Impact Factor