Article

An overview of JET edge modelling activities

Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Journal of Nuclear Materials (Impact Factor: 2.02). 03/2003; DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01466-6
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT A number of codes are in use at JET to model the edge plasma. The range of edge codes is described as is the range of physics issues being explored by these codes. The balance between focussed modelling (that looking at particular physics effects) and integrated modelling (attempting to combine codes or encapsulate the physics from some codes into other codes) is examined.

0 Followers
 · 
132 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Progress, since the ITER Physics Basis publication (ITER Physics Basis Editors et al 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2137–2664), in understanding the processes that will determine the properties of the plasma edge and its interaction with material elements in ITER is described. Experimental areas where significant progress has taken place are energy transport in the scrape-off layer (SOL) in particular of the anomalous transport scaling, particle transport in the SOL that plays a major role in the interaction of diverted plasmas with the main-chamber material elements, edge localized mode (ELM) energy deposition on material elements and the transport mechanism for the ELM energy from the main plasma to the plasma facing components, the physics of plasma detachment and neutral dynamics including the edge density profile structure and the control of plasma particle content and He removal, the erosion of low- and high-Z materials in fusion devices, their transport to the core plasma and their migration at the plasma edge including the formation of mixed materials, the processes determining the size and location of the retention of tritium in fusion devices and methods to remove it and the processes determining the efficiency of the various fuelling methods as well as their development towards the ITER requirements. This experimental progress has been accompanied by the development of modelling tools for the physical processes at the edge plasma and plasma–materials interaction and the further validation of these models by comparing their predictions with the new experimental results. Progress in the modelling development and validation has been mostly concentrated in the following areas: refinement in the predictions for ITER with plasma edge modelling codes by inclusion of detailed geometrical features of the divertor and the introduction of physical effects, which can play a major role in determining the divertor parameters at the divertor for ITER conditions such as hydrogen radiation transport and neutral–neutral collisions, modelling of the ion orbits at the plasma edge, which can play a role in determining power deposition at the divertor target, models for plasma–materials and plasma dynamics interaction during ELMs and disruptions, models for the transport of impurities at the plasma edge to describe the core contamination by impurities and the migration of eroded materials at the edge plasma and its associated tritium retention and models for the turbulent processes that determine the anomalous transport of energy and particles across the SOL. The implications for the expected performance of the reference regimes in ITER, the operation of the ITER device and the lifetime of the plasma facing materials are discussed.
    Nuclear Fusion 05/2007; 47(6):S203. DOI:10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S04 · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experiments performed at JET during the past two years show that, in high triangularity H-mode plasmas with Ip = 2.5 MA, ne/nGr ≈ 1.0, it is possible to radiate separately up to ≈40% of the total injected power on closed flux surfaces in the pedestal region (argon seeding) and up to ≈50% of the injected power in the divertor region (nitrogen seeding), while maintaining the confinement improvement factor at the value required for ITER, H98(y, 2) ≈ 1.0. The total radiated power fraction achieved in both cases (65–70%) is close to that required for ITER. However, Type I ELMs observed with impurity seeding have the same characteristics as that observed in reference pulses without seeding: decreasing plasma energy loss per ELM with increasing pedestal collisionality. One has to reach the Type III ELM regime to decrease the transient heat load to the divertor to acceptable values for ITER, although at the expense of confinement. The feasibility of an integrated scenario with Type-III ELMs, and q95 = 2.6 to compensate for the low H factor, has been demonstrated on JET. This scenario would meet ITER requirements at 17 MA provided that the IPB98 scaling for energy content is accurate enough, and provided that a lower dilution is obtained when operating at higher absolute electron density.
    Nuclear Fusion 10/2005; 45(11):1404. DOI:10.1088/0029-5515/45/11/022 · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is well known that the classical Spitzer–Harm–Braginskii expression for the parallel plasma heat flux breaks down in the long mean free path limit, relevant to many practical applications, most crucially power exhaust via the tokamak scrape-off layer (SOL). This problem is usually addressed by limiting the heat flux to some fraction of the free streaming value, with constants of proportionality ασ, where σ {e,i}, ranging from 0.03 to 3. The following paper presents a brief overview of the problem, compares the results of various kinetic studies, suggests the optimal values of ασ for use in plasma–fluid codes, and examines the impact of these values on 2D SOL simulations using the EDGE2D transport code. In this context, gyro-kinetic parallel heat flux expressions for both electrons and ions are derived from the generalized transport equations—an improved version of Grad's 21-moment approach—and their implications to tokamak modelling are discussed.
    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 10/2005; 47(11):R163. DOI:10.1088/0741-3335/47/11/R01 · 2.39 Impact Factor