Preventing myocardial infarction and stroke with a simplified bundle of cardioprotective medications.

Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
The American journal of managed care (Impact Factor: 2.17). 10/2009; 15(10):e88-94.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the effect of promoting a bundle of fixed doses of a generic statin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB), delivered with minimal outpatient visits, laboratory testing, and dosage titration, to people with diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), or both in a large integrated healthcare system.
Three-year observational study of 170,024 Kaiser Permanente members with diabetes, CAD, or both.
Using instrumental variable analysis, we assessed the impact of promoting the cardioprotective bundle on hospitalization rates for stroke and myocardial infarction (MI).
In 2004 and 2005, 47,268 of 170,024 individuals received "low exposure" (medication possession on 1 to 365 days). Their risk of hospitalization for MI or stroke in 2006 was lowered by 15 events per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1, 30), preventing events in 726 people. Furthermore, 21,292 of 170,024 individuals received "high exposure" (medication possession on 366 to 730 days). Their risk of hospitalization for MI or stroke was reduced by 26 events per 1000 person-years (95% CI = 17, 34), preventing events in 545 people.
A simplified method for bundling fixed doses of a generic statin and an ACEI/ARB was successfully implemented in a large, diverse population in an integrated healthcare delivery system, reducing the risk of hospitalization for MI and stroke.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD) are two of the most prevalent medical illnesses in the US population and comorbid depression occurs in up to 20% of these patients. Guidelines for management of diabetes and CHD overlap for healthy lifestyle and disease-control recommendations. However, the majority of patients with these medical illnesses have been shown to have inadequate control of key risk factors such as blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, or blood sugar. Comorbid depression has been shown to adversely affect self-care of diabetes and CHD, and is associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality. Interventions that have improved quality and outcomes of depression care alone in patients with diabetes and CHD have not demonstrated benefits in self-care, improved disease control or morbidity and mortality. This paper describes the design and development of a new biopsychosocial intervention (TEAMcare) aimed at improving both medical disease control and depression in patients with poor control of diabetes and/or CHD who met the criteria for comorbid depression. A team approach is used with a nurse interventionist who receives weekly psychiatric and primary care physician caseload supervision in order to enhance treatment by the primary care physician. This intervention is being tested in an NIMH-funded randomized controlled trial in a large integrated health plan.
    Contemporary clinical trials 03/2010; 31(4):312-22. DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.009 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) account for one-third of annual global mortality. The aggregated benefits of concurrently controlling common CVD risk factors, such as dyslipidemia and hypertension, in people at overall risk for CVD is postulated to be more efficient than treating each individual risk factor to target. Administration of a polypill consisting of cholesterol-lowering (statins), antihypertensive, and antiplatelet agents together would simultaneously lower multiple risk factors, and applying such a population risk-reduction strategy would drastically reduce CVD incidence. This idea has generated much controversy and debate over the past decade. A few studies have emerged providing early evidence about the safety and efficacy of such a pill, and the results of ongoing and planned studies of outcome are eagerly anticipated. In this article, we review and interpret the existing evidence as well as explore the potential of a polypill for primary and secondary prevention of CVD.
    Annual Review of Public Health 03/2010; 32:23-38. DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101214 · 6.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody indicated for adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. Omalizumab has been demonstrated to improve health outcomes of asthmatic patients as compared to placebo. However, to date, the trials conducted have been relatively short (less than 1 year) and have been restricted to a limited set of patients who met the clinical study criteria. This study examined the expected effects of omalizumab over 5 years on a representative sample of all patients eligible for omalizumab in the US. The Archimedes Asthma Model was used to simulate the following treatment scenarios for US patients age 12 and older with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma: (1) Current asthma treatment (CAT) (treatment according to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines, without use of omalizumab, and with adherence levels as observed in the National Asthma Survey); (2) Guideline asthma treatment (GAT) without omalizumab (NHLBI guidelines without use of omalizumab, assuming perfect adherence); (3) GAT plus omalizumab; and (4) GAT plus omalizumab with steroid reduction. The simulation was run for 5 years. Main outcome measures: Symptom days, asthma exacerbations, emergency room/urgent care (ER/UC) visits, hospitalizations, and medication use. For the full simulated population of omalizumab-eligible patients, the simulation forecasted that omalizumab would decrease cumulative exacerbations by 30%, ER/UC visits by 37%, and hospitalizations by 38% over 5 years. Among responders to omalizumab, assuming that 60.5% of patients respond, the results suggest that omalizumab would decrease cumulative exacerbations by 50%, ER/UC visits by 62%, and hospitalizations by 63% over 5 years. In addition, the simulation predicted that omalizumab would allow 45% of patients who are taking more than the minimum steroid dose to reduce their steroid dose, while maintaining similar asthma control as achieved in the GAT plus omalizumab arm (no steroid dose reduction) and better asthma control than following treatment protocols that do not include omalizumab. Based on the results of this simulation, omalizumab is effective for those who respond, reducing serious events by more than 50% among the responder group, while also allowing many patients to reduce their steroid dose.
    Current Medical Research and Opinion 11/2010; 26(12):2779-93. DOI:10.1185/03007995.2010.526101 · 2.37 Impact Factor


Available from