Inflammation in subcutaneous adipose tissue: relationship to adipose cell size.

Division of Endocrinology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm S025, Stanford, CA 94305-5103, USA.
Diabetologia (Impact Factor: 6.88). 10/2009; 53(2):369-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-009-1496-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Inflammation is associated with increased body mass and purportedly with increased size of adipose cells. We sought to determine whether increased size of adipose cells is associated with localised inflammation in weight-stable, moderately obese humans.
We recruited 49 healthy, moderately obese individuals for quantification of insulin resistance (modified insulin suppression test) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue biopsy. Cell size distribution was analysed with a multisizer device and inflammatory gene expression with real-time PCR. Correlations between inflammatory gene expression and cell size variables, with adjustment for sex and insulin resistance, were calculated.
Adipose cells were bimodally distributed, with 47% in a 'large' cell population and the remainder in a 'small' cell population. The median diameter of the large adipose cells was not associated with expression of inflammatory genes. Rather, the fraction of small adipose cells was consistently associated with inflammatory gene expression, independently of sex, insulin resistance and BMI. This association was more pronounced in insulin-resistant than insulin-sensitive individuals. Insulin resistance also independently predicted expression of inflammatory genes.
This study demonstrates that among moderately obese, weight-stable individuals an increased proportion of small adipose cells is associated with inflammation in subcutaneous adipose tissue, whereas size of mature adipose cells is not. The observed association between small adipose cells and inflammation may reflect impaired adipogenesis and/or terminal differentiation. However, it is unclear whether this is a cause or consequence of inflammation. This question and whether small vs large adipose cells contribute differently to inflammation in adipose tissue are topics for future research. Trial registration: NCT00285844.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although white adipocytes contain a larger number of mitochondria per cytoplasmic volume, adipocyte mitochondrial uncoupling to reduce the efficiency of ATP production on cellular function including secretory regulation of bioactive molecules such as VEGF and MCP-1 remains to be elucidated. Here we induce mitochondrial uncoupling under hypoxia-independent conditions in mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes using a metabolic uncoupler, dinitrophenol (DNP). MCP-1 release was significantly decreased by 26% (p<0.01) in 24h DNP (30 μmol/L)-treated adipocytes compared to control cells. In contrast, secreted VEGF(120) lacking a heparin-binding domain was markedly increased 2.0-fold (p<0.01). CHOP content in these cells also were augmented (p<0.01), but no significant increase of endogenous oxidative stress was observed. Treatment with thapsigargin, which can induce exogenous endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, clearly attenuated MCP-1 release (p<0.01), but exhibited no effects on VEGF(120) secretion. On the other hand, exogenous H(2)O(2) amplified both MCP-1 and VEGF(120) secretion (p<0.05). In addition, under chronic activation of AMPK by AICAR, MCP-1 release was significantly diminished (p<0.05) but VEGF(120) secretion was increased (p<0.01). JNK phosphorylation in mature adipocytes was decreased by treatment with either DNP or AICAR (p<0.01). Enhanced VEGF(120) secretion with either DNP or AICAR was markedly suppressed by PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (p<0.01). Thus, induced mitochondrial uncoupling in adipocytes can reduce MCP-1 release through induction of endogenous ER stress and by reduced JNK activities via chronic activation of AMPK. Under this condition, VEGF(120) secretion was increased through PI3K-dependent pathways, which were chronically activated by AMPK, and not through ER stress. Because the decrease of MCP-1 secretion under mitochondrial uncoupling might attenuate chronic low-grade inflammation by suppressing macrophages recruitment to adipose tissue, clarification of the mechanism might reveal novel therapeutic targets for ameliorating obesity-associated insulin resistance in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 02/2012; 419(2):200-5. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.145 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In response to palmitate, the antidiabetic sulfonylurea drug glimepiride, phosphoinositoglycans, or H(2)O(2), the release of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-degrading phosphodiesterase Gce1 from adipocytes into small vesicles (adiposomes) and its translocation from adiposomes to cytoplasmic lipid droplets (LD) of adipocytes have been reported. Here the role of Gce1-harboring adiposomes in coordinating lipolysis between differently sized adipocytes was studied. Separate or mixed populations of isolated epididymal rat adipocytes of small and large size and native adipose tissue pieces from young and old rats were incubated with exogenous adiposomes or depleted of endogenous adiposomes and then analyzed for translocation of Gce1 and lipolysis in response to above antilipolytic stimuli. Large compared with small adipocytes are more efficient in releasing Gce1 into adiposomes but less efficient in translocating Gce1 from adiposomes to LDs. Maximal lipolysis inhibition by above antilipolytic stimuli, but not by insulin, was observed with mixed populations of small and large adipocytes (1:1 to 1:2) rather than with separate populations. In mixed adipocyte populations and adipose tissue pieces from young, but not old, rats, lipolysis inhibition by above antilipolytic stimuli, but not by insulin, was dependent on the function of Gce1-harboring adiposomes. Inhibition of lipolysis in rat adipose tissue in response to palmitate, glimepiride, and H(2)O(2) is coordinated via the release of adiposome-associated and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Gce1 from large "donor" adipocytes and their subsequent translocation to the LDs of small "acceptor" adipocytes. This transfer of antilipolytic information may be of pathophysiologic relevance.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental 12/2010; 60(7):1021-37. DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2010.10.007 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review is focused on the fate of dietary glucose under conditions of chronically high energy (largely fat) intake, evolving into the metabolic syndrome. We are adapted to carbohydrate-rich diets similar to those of our ancestors. Glucose is the main energy staple, but fats are our main energy reserves. Starvation drastically reduces glucose availability, forcing the body to shift to fatty acids as main energy substrate, sparing glucose and amino acids. We are not prepared for excess dietary energy, our main defenses being decreased food intake and increased energy expenditure, largely enhanced metabolic activity and thermogenesis. High lipid availability is a powerful factor decreasing glucose and amino acid oxidation. Present-day diets are often hyperenergetic, high on lipids, with abundant protein and limited amounts of starchy carbohydrates. Dietary lipids favor their metabolic processing, saving glucose, which additionally spares amino acids. The glucose excess elicits hyperinsulinemia, which may derive, in the end, into insulin resistance. The available systems of energy disposal could not cope with the excess of substrates, since they are geared for saving not for spendthrift, which results in an unbearable overload of the storage mechanisms. Adipose tissue is the last energy sink, it has to store the energy that cannot be used otherwise. However, adipose tissue growth also has limits, and the excess of energy induces inflammation, helped by the ineffective intervention of the immune system. However, even under this acute situation, the excess of glucose remains, favoring its final conversion to fat. The sum of inflammatory signals and deranged substrate handling induce most of the metabolic syndrome traits: insulin resistance, obesity, diabetes, liver steatosis, hyperlipidemia and their compounded combined effects. Thus, a maintained excess of energy in the diet may result in difficulties in the disposal of glucose, eliciting inflammation and the development of the metabolic syndrome.
    Nutrition & Metabolism 10/2011; 8(1):74. DOI:10.1186/1743-7075-8-74 · 3.36 Impact Factor


1 Download
Available from