A prospective study of substance use and housing stability in a homeless population.

VA North Texas Health Care System, 4500 S. Lancaster Rd., Dallas, TX 75216, USA.
Social Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.05). 10/2009; 45(11):1055-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-009-0144-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study examined self-report and urine test data about homeless substance use over time, prospectively comparing substance use with attainment of stable housing.
400 homeless people systematically sampled from shelters and streets in St. Louis, Missouri were assessed with structured diagnostic interviews and urine substance testing annually over 2 years. Nearly two-thirds (n = 255) completed all three assessments, constituting the sample for this prospective study.
More than half (55%) of this homeless sample had detectable cocaine use during the study. Most cocaine users continued using during the next 2 years and failed to achieve and maintain stable housing. Cocaine use in the first follow-up year predicted housing patterns over the next 2 years, independent of lifetime diagnosis of cocaine use disorder. Alcohol abuse/dependence in the 2-year follow-up period did not predict housing outcomes.
The course of cocaine use and abuse/dependence, but not continuing alcohol addiction, was associated with subsequent attainment of stable housing, especially cocaine use in the first prospective year. Replication of these findings in other locations to determine generalizability may have implications for designing housing service models.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and AimsSmoking prevalence among homeless adults is exceedingly high, and high rates of comorbid substance use are among the barriers to abstinence experienced by this group. The extent to which smoking cessation might engender an escalation in comorbid substance use could be a concern prohibiting treatment provision and engagement. This study examined whether smoking abstinence status was associated with alcohol and substance use at 26 weeks post-randomization among homeless smokers in a smoking cessation trial.DesignThe current study was a secondary analysis of randomized smoking cessation intervention trial data.SettingThe parent study was conducted in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area of Minnesota, USA.ParticipantsParticipants were 427 homeless adult smokers interested in quitting smoking.MeasurementsCovariates collected at baseline included alcohol, cocaine, marijuana/hashish, heroin, and “any” drug use, age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, tobacco dependence, length of time homeless, and treatment group. Biochemically-verified smoking abstinence and self-reported alcohol and substance use were collected at 26 weeks post-randomization.FindingsSmoking abstinence was associated with fewer drinking days (p=.03), fewer drinks consumed on drinking days (p=.01), and lower odds of heavy drinking (p=.05), but not with differences in the number of days of cocaine, marijuana/hashish, heroin, or any drug use.Conclusions In homeless smokers, achieving smoking abstinence may be associated with a reduction in alcohol consumption but appears not to be associated with a substantial change in other drug use.
    Addiction 07/2014; 109(12). DOI:10.1111/add.12688 · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite housing stability being a key concept in housing and homelessness policy, research, and service provision, it remains poorly defined and conceptualized, and to date there are no standard measures. We use in-depth qualitative interviews with 51 young people transitioning away homelessness over the course of a year to examine the core dimensions of housing stability. Due to the potential for sudden change, we define housing stability as the extent to which an individual's customary access to housing of reasonable quality is secure. We define housing security among 8 main dimensions: housing type, recent housing history, current housing tenure, financial status, standing in the legal system, education and employment status, harmful substance use, and subjective assessments of housing satisfaction and stability. Based on these dimensions, we suggest a brief 13-question scale that measures housing security.
    Journal of Community Psychology 11/2014; 42(8). DOI:10.1002/jcop.21665 · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Homeless individuals are an extremely vulnerable and underserved population characterized by overlapping problems of mental illness and substance use. Given the fact that mood disorders are frequently associated with substance use disorders, we wanted to further highlight the role of excitement in substance abuse. Patterns of substance abuse among homeless suffering from unipolar and bipolar depression were compared. The "self-medication hypothesis" which would predict no-differences in substance preference by unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP) depressed homeless was tested. Homeless individuals from the Vancouver At Home/Chez Soi study were selected for lifetime UP and lifetime BP depression and patterns of substances abused in the previous 12 months were identified with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Differences in substance use between BP-depressed homeless and UP-depressed homeless were tested using Chi-square and logistic regression techniques. No significant differences were observed between UP and BP homeless demographics. The bipolar depressed homeless (BDH) group displayed a higher percentage of Central Nervous System (CNS) Stimulants (χ 8.66, p=0.004) and Opiates (χ 6.41, p=0.013) as compared to the unipolar depressed homeless (UDH) group. CSN Stimulant was the only predictor within the BDH Group (χ(2) 8.74 df 1 p<0.003). Data collected are self-reported and no urinalyses were performed. The results support the hypothesis that beyond the self-medication hypothesis, bipolarity is strictly correlated to substance use; this correlation is also verified in a homeless population. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 02/2015; 176C. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.059 · 3.71 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014