Article

Prognostic significance of home blood pressure control on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease.

Department of Nephrology, Tokyo Medical University, Japan.
Hypertension Research (Impact Factor: 2.94). 10/2009; 32(12):1123-9. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2009.165
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The influence of home blood pressure (HBP) control on renal and cardiovascular outcomes is not fully defined, and the optimal blood pressure (BP) target in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unknown. To clarify the influence of HBP on the progression of CKD and the occurrence of cardiovascular events in elderly CKD patients, we recruited 104 patients with stage 3 to 5 CKD, who were > or =70 years of age. The mean follow-up duration was 39+/-15 months. HBP was measured every morning and evening for 7 consecutive days. HBP data were obtained every 6 months for 79 of these patients. There were significant correlations observed between morning systolic BP (SBP), evening SBP and the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during the follow-up period (baseline/follow-up; morning r=-0.55/-0.51, evening r=-0.48/-0.38, all P<0.0001, baseline: baseline values, follow-up: mean values obtained every 6 months during the follow-up period). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis identified morning SBP and urinary protein excretion as independent predictors of a change in eGFR during the follow-up period. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that baseline morning SBP, baseline evening SBP and follow-up morning SBP were significantly associated with an increased risk of renal events (hazard ratios; 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.07), 1.06 (1.02-1.09) and 1.10 (1.04-1.17), respectively). However, Cox proportional hazards analyses showed that there was no significant association between BP and the risk of cardiovascular events. In conclusion, even among elderly CKD patients, HBP is a significant predictor of decline in renal function and the development of end-stage renal disease. In addition, the optimal target BP for elderly CKD patients needs to be clarified.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Yume Nagaoka, Nov 26, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, such angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II receptor blockers, to slow progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a large group dominated by elderly people in the real world is not supported by available evidence. Large-scale clinical trials had many faults, among them a lack of focus on the elderly. However, it would be difficult to conduct clinical trials of a similar scale in elderly CKD patients. Besides, progression of kidney disease is often slow in elderly persons, and the vast majority of older adults with CKD will die before reaching end stage renal disease. Moreover, since it is not clear that progression of kidney disease, and even of proteinuric diabetic nephropathy, is not inhibited through the use of RAS inhibitors, the most patient-centric goal of therapy for many elderly individuals should be individualized.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the effects of aliskiren in terms of its inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) as well as that on blood pressure (BP), and renal and cardiac protection in elderly chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with hypertension. Nineteen elderly CKD patients (nine males, ten females, aged 74.6 ± 5.8 years) were assigned to receive 150 mg/day of aliskiren added to existing antihypertensives for 6 months. Changes in plasma renin activity (PRA), angiotensin I (Ang I), angiotensin II (Ang II), aldosterone (Ald), BP, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), interventricular septum thickness (IVST), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were evaluated. ALISKIREN SUPPRESSED THE RAAS AS FOLLOWS: PRA 1.3 ± 1.0 to 0.3 ± 0.3 ng/mL/hour, P < 0.05; Ang I 59.5 ± 32.1 to 26.0 ± 17.3 pg/mL, P < 0.05; Ang II 58.4 ± 62.1 to 14.3 ± 9.0 pg/mL, P < 0.05; and Ald 86.1 ± 38.3 to 80.1 ± 52.6 pg/mL, not significant (NS). Aliskiren reduced BP (153.6/77.2 ± 14.9/10.4 to 130.9/72.2 ± 15.6/9.9 mmHg, P < 0.05). It also reduced UACR (747.1 ± 1121.4 to 409.6 ± 636.8 mg/g, P < 0.05), whereas it did not change eGFR (52.1 ± 29.2 to 51.2 ± 29.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2), NS), LVEF (66.8 ± 7.9 to 66.5% ± 6.8%, NS), IVST (10.1 ± 1.8 to 9.9 ± 1.8 mm, NS), LVPWT (10.0 ± 1.6 mm to 10.0 ± 1.4 mm, NS), or BNP (48.2 ± 46.0 to 54.9 ± 41.1 pg/mL, NS). Aliskiren was effective for BP control and reduced UACR while maintaining eGFR and heart function in elderly CKD patients with hypertension.
    International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 09/2012; 5:125-32. DOI:10.2147/IJNRD.S36451
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hypertension is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the prevalence increases with declining kidney function. Hypertension management is particularly important due to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke in the CKD population. Most clinical decisions for blood pressure (BP) management are based on BP readings in the office or dialysis unit. These BP readings often are inaccurate. Home BP monitoring provides more data than conventional clinic or dialysis-unit BP measurements and is relatively easy to accomplish, is cost-effective, and has been shown to have an increasing role in the management of BP in the CKD population. This In Practice article focuses on the use of home BP monitoring in patients with CKD. We also provide guidance for choosing a BP monitoring device and review recent literature regarding the use of home BP monitoring and the effect on CKD outcomes. In addition, we address the future use of electronic medical records and how they may interface with home BP monitoring.
    American Journal of Kidney Diseases 05/2014; DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.015 · 5.76 Impact Factor