Influence of Mandibular Fixation Method on Stability of the Maxillary Occlusal Plane after Occlusal Plane Alteration

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Mihama-ku, Chiba, Japan.
The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College 05/2009; 50(2):71-82. DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.50.71
Source: PubMed


In this study, we investigated how method of mandibular fixation influenced longterm postoperative stability of the maxilla in Class III cases. In particular, we investigated change in the maxillary occlusal plane after Occlusal Plane Alteration. Therefore, we focused on change in the palatal plane to evaluate stability of the maxillary occlusal plane, as the position of the palatal plane affects the maxillary occlusal plane. This study included 16 patients diagnosed with mandibular protrusion. Alteration of the occlusal plane was achieved by clockwise rotation of the maxilla by Le Fort I osteotomy and mandibular setback was performed by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. We analyzed and examined lateral cephalometric radiographs taken at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Stability achieved by two methods of mandibular fixation was compared. In one group of patients (group S) titanium screws were used, and in the other group (group P) titanium-locking mini-plates were used. No significant displacement was recognized in group S, whereas an approximately 0.7mm upward vertical displacement was recognized in the anterior nasal spine in group P. As a result, not only the angle of the palatal plane and S-N plane, but also occlusal plane angle in group P showed a greater decrease than that in group S. The results suggest that fixing the mandible with screws yielded greater stability of the maxilla and maxillary occlusal plane than fixing the mandible with titanium plates.

Download full-text


Available from: Takashi Takaki,
  • Source
    • "Also, this planning gave us extremely important visual data and maked the surgery easier. Some cases require bimaxillary surgery which is a harder surgery than a single jaw surgery [17]. Because a single jaw surgery was performed, occlusal plane alteration requireda less aggressive surgery in our case. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Mandibular prognathism is inadaptability between skull and mandible and is one phenotype of class III malocculsion. Polydiastema may be present together with class III malocclusion. Skeletal class III malocclusion with mandibular prognathism can be diagnosed by cephalometric parameters. Study Design: A 22-year-old man complaining about difficult mastication and speech was referred to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. According to the cephalometric analysis of the patient in sagittal plane, maxilla was 3 mm behind and mandible was 1 mm ahead from the skull base. During presurgical orthodontic treatment, polydiastema was treated in max-illa and mandible. Result and Conclusions: Skeletal class III malocclusion requires an orthognathic surgical procedure including some techniques. One of these techniques is mandibular body os-tectomy, which is performed often as a surgical procedure for skeletal class III malocclusion. Instead of sagittal split osteomy, the technique of madibular body ostectomy could be performed as an alternative
    Case Reports in Clinical Medicine 12/2014; 3(11):601-608. DOI:10.4236/crcm.2014.311130
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Defects at the lower border of the mandible may persist after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of lower border defects after BSSO and to identify factors associated with the development of these defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent BSSO at St John's Hospital from January 2010 through December 2011. The predictor variables were length of advancement and inclusion of the full thickness of the lower border in the split. The outcome variable was the presence or absence of a lower border defect. Other variables were age and the side of the mouth. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.22. RESULTS: The analysis included 400 operation sites in 200 patients (124 female, 76 male; median age, 24.5 yr; range, 14 to 57 yr). A defect at the mandibular border presented in more than one third of operation sites. Inclusion of the full thickness of the lower border in the split, length of advancement, side of the jaw, and age (P < .0001) were risk factors for a permanent defect at the lower border of the osteotomy gap after BSSO. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of the full thickness of the lower mandibular border, the age of the patient, and the magnitude of advancement during BSSO are important predictors of whether a postoperative mandibular defect will remain after surgery. Surgeons should ensure that the lingual cortex of the lower border is not included in the split in large mandibular advancements.
    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 09/2012; 71(3). DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.003 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Preoperative Complications Intraoperative Complications Maxillary Surgery: Intraoperative Complications Bleeding and Hemorrhage Genioplasty Mandible: Intraoperative Complications Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy (IVRO) Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Postoperative Complications of Orthognathic Surgery Conclusions Suggested Readings
    Management of Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 04/2013: pages 109-136; , ISBN: 9780813820521
Show more