Intersection of Canadian Policy Parameters Affecting Women with Precarious Immigration Status: A Baseline for Understanding Barriers to Health

Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire sur la violence familiale et la violence faite aux femmes, Université de Montréal, Case postale 0128, succursale Centre-ville Montréal, QC Canada, H3C 3J7.
Journal of Immigrant Health 10/2005; 7(4):247-58. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-005-5122-2
Source: PubMed


Canadian federal policy provides a framework for the immigration and health experiences of immigrant women. The official immigration category under which a migrant is admitted determines to what degree her right to remain in the country (immigration status) is precarious. Women immigrants fall primarily into the more dependent categories and they experience barriers to access to health services arising from this precarious status. Federal immigration and health policies create direct barriers to health through regulation of immigrants' access to services as well as unintended secondary barriers. These direct and secondary policy barriers intersect with each other and with socio-cultural barriers arising from the migrant's socioeconomic and ethno-cultural background to undermine equitable access to health for immigrant women living in Canada.

Download full-text


Available from: Jill Hanley, Oct 04, 2015
1 Follower
55 Reads
    • "For the two women, whose identities, and social roles were predominantly defined from strong patriarchal values, resettlement into a western culture seemed more difficult. Despite the limitations of the case study approach, one may argue that women's isolation lends evidence to the gendered nature of resettlement (Lenette, 2013; Oxman-Martinez et al., 2005). Multiple forced migrations and resettlement are not without affecting refugee women's activities and the construction of their new identities. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accepted for publication.
    01/2015; DOI:10.1108/IJHRH-12-2014-0031
  • Source
    • "There are very few studies examining the living conditions and challenges in accessing health and social care for undocumented migrants in Canada [7] [8] [9] . A recent study of perinatal outcomes of uninsured women in Toronto reports that "
    10/2014; 4(3). DOI:10.5430/jnep.v4n3p217
  • Source
    • "Sponsors agree to financially support their dependents for 10 years (even if the sponsored immigrant becomes a Canadian citizen in that period), including repaying any social assistance they may incur (Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services 2013). Family class immigrants constitute a more vulnerable segment of the workforce if they feel compelled to repay their families for bringing them to Canada and supporting them, at times remaining in employment despite poor working conditions, ill health, or old age (Fairey et al. 2008; Oxman-Martinez et al. 2005). Furthermore, while immigrants in this category have the right to move freely in the labor market, their mobility is hindered by language "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article explores how precarious legal status circumscribes differential inclusion in the agricultural labor market and affects workers' lives through a comparative study of workplace health and safety among temporary migrant guest workers and immigrants in Canada. Original, multimethod research with South Asian immigrant and Mexican migrant farmworkers examines employment practices, working conditions, and health-care access. We find that both groups engage in precarious work, with consequences for their health and safety, including immigrant workers with citizenship. Nevertheless, migrant guest workers are subject to more coercive forms of labor discipline and a narrower range of social protection than immigrants. We argue that while formal citizenship can mitigate some dimensions of precariousness for farmworkers racialized as non-white, achieving a more just, safer food system will require broader policies to improve employer compliance and address legislative shortcomings that only weakly protect agricultural labor.
    Rural Sociology 05/2014; 79(2). DOI:10.1111/ruso.12043 · 1.89 Impact Factor
Show more