Article

Improving colon cancer screening rates in primary care: a pilot study emphasising the role of the medical assistant.

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Quality and Safety in Health Care (Impact Factor: 2.16). 10/2009; 18(5):355-9. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.027649
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-leading cause of cancer death for both men and women in the USA. Despite consensus recommendations for screening, just over half of eligible adults nationally have undergone screening. We therefore implemented a programme to improve the rate of CRC screening.
This study was conducted in the Utah Health Research Network and the University of Utah Community Clinics, a 100 000 patient, seven-practice, university-owned system offering primary and secondary care and ancillary services including endoscopy. We focused on patients aged >or=50 who were seen between 1 January 2003 and 31 October 2006, and who were not current for CRC screening at the time of the visit. The study included a three-phase
electronic medical record (EMR) reminders, physician and medical assistant (MA) education about CRC screening guidelines, and redesign of patient visit workflow with an expanded role for MAs to review patients' CRC screening status and recommend testing when appropriate. With patient agreement, the MA entered a preliminary order in the EMR, and the physician confirmed or rejected the order. The primary outcome measure was the rate of screening colonoscopy ordered for eligible patients.
The baseline colonoscopy referral rate was 6.0%. Provider education and electronic reminders had minimal immediate impact on screening rates. Addition of the expanded MA role was associated with a sustained increase in colonoscopy referral order rate to 13.4%, a relative improvement of 123%.
The MA can play a key role in improving CRC screening rates as part of a redesigned system of primary care.

1 Bookmark
 · 
144 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To accelerate the translation of research findings into practice for underserved populations, we investigated the adaptation of an evidence-based intervention (EBI), designed to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in one limited English-proficient (LEP) population (Chinese), for another LEP group (Vietnamese) with overlapping cultural and health beliefs.
    Implementation Science 07/2014; 9(1):85. · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • JAMA Internal Medicine 05/2014; · 13.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Providers and non-physician staff in primary care settings have reported barriers to full electronic health record (EHR) utilization. This study evaluates the effectiveness of EHR use for accurately documenting cervical cancer screening in a community healthcare setting, and proposes strategies to improve documentation. An electronic query generated data on average-risk patients aged 21-64 who had a medical visit at Fenway Health in 2012 and were overdue for a Papanicolaou (Pap) test according to the 2012 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines. We then conducted a manual review of these records to determine the accuracy of EHR documentation. Of a total 5,279 patients, the electronic query classified 2,982 (56.5 %) as up-to-date (UTD) for a Pap and 2,297 patients (43.5 %) as overdue. Upon manual review, 65 (2.2 %) patients thought to be UTD were actually overdue. Of those 2,297 patients classified by the query as overdue, 816 (35.5 %) were reclassified as UTD due to evidence of a recent Pap in their chart that was not extractable by electronic query and 208 (9.1 %) were ineligible for a Pap; only 1,272 patients (55.4 %) of the 2,297 classified by the query were truly overdue. The cervical cancer screening rate indicated by electronic query was 56.5 %; after manual review, the adjusted rate was 73.6 %. Overall, 1,090 patients (20.6 %) were misclassified by the query. Inefficient EHR use can have serious implications for clinical practice and performance measures. Primary care practices need to develop mechanisms to capture outside medical records and create a team-based approach to facilitate accurate EHR documentation.
    Journal of Community Health 01/2014; · 1.28 Impact Factor