Disability disparities: a beginning model.

Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980330, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0330, USA.
Disability and Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 1.54). 01/2009; 31(14):1136-43.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper presents a model of disability disparities. Though the concept of health disparities is discussed in the health care literature, there is no such model that explicitly addresses disparities in the disability literature. Therefore, this model begins to fill a void in the disability literature. Part of the value of such a model is that it represents an attempt to address the question of why cultural competency is important in the disability arena at this point in the 21st century. The urgency in addressing cultural competency at this time in history is supported by understanding the multiple accountability demands on rehabilitation and disability providers these days, e.g., increasing diversification of the United States population, that render providing effective services to everyone a clear mandate. The author provides a working definition of disability disparity. The disability disparity model is described in terms of its five-domain continuum as well as its macro- and micro-level aspects that are designed to both promote clarity of the concept for researchers and offer practitioners ideas on how to explore the existence of disability disparities in working with specific service recipients. Limitations and strengths of the model are discussed along with suggested next steps in model validation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the adequacy of existing service systems in addressing the needs of refugees with disabilities resettled in the U.S.A. A cross-disability group of eight Cambodian and seven Somali refugees were purposively selected to participate in a 2-year qualitative study in the Midwestern U.S.A. Ten disability/refugee service providers and key experts on refugee resettlement were also recruited to participate. Data sources included in-depth interviews, focus groups, participant observations and social network surveys with disabled refugees. Participant observations and semi-structured interviews were also conducted with service providers and key experts. Data were analyzed using coding procedures based on a grounded theory approach. Disabled refugee participants experienced several unmet disability-related needs and limited access to resettlement resources on account of their disability. These findings were associated with refugee service providers having limited awareness of disability rights and resources and a narrow biomedical perspective of disability. Additionally there was a disconnection between refugee and disability service systems resulting from resource limitations within agencies, mistrust between the different service entities, and a lack of cross-cultural nuance among disability service organizations. These findings contribute important insights to the literature on disability disparities. Disabled refugees resettled in the U.S.A. have many unmet needs associated with gaps in-service delivery stemming from disconnections between refugee and disability service systems.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 01/2012; 34(7):542-52. · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether differences exist in employment rates between whites, blacks, and Hispanics with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at 1, 2, or 5 years after injury; to determine whether changes occur in postinjury employment rates over time for whites, blacks, and Hispanics; and to determine whether changes in postinjury employment rates over time are different for whites, blacks, and Hispanics. Sixteen TBI Model System centers. Persons (3,940) with moderate-to-severe TBI who self-reported as white, black, or Hispanic. Employment status dichotomized as competitively employed versus not competitively employed. The odds of competitive employment were significantly greater for whites versus blacks at 1, 2, and 5 years after injury and were greater for whites versus Hispanics at 1 and 2 years after injury; whites and Hispanics did not differ significantly at 5 years after injury; and blacks and Hispanics were not significantly different at 1, 2, or 5 years after injury. The odds of employment increased significantly from 1-2, 2-5, and 1-5 years after injury for whites and Hispanics, whereas the odds of employment increased from 2-5 and 1-5 years after injury for blacks, with no significant difference between 1 and 2 years after injury for blacks. No evidence was found that the changes in employment rates over time were significantly different among the race and/or ethnicity groups. Future researchers should seek to identify causative factors for employment disparities, and rehabilitation professionals should work to mitigate inequalities in employment among racial and ethnic groups with TBI.
    PM&R 08/2011; 3(12):1083-91. · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relative lack of standards for collecting data on population subgroups has not only limited our understanding of health disparities, but also impaired our ability to develop policies to eliminate them. This article provides background about past challenges to collecting data by race/ethnicity, primary language, sex, and disability status. It then discusses how passage of the Affordable Care Act has provided new opportunities to improve data-collection standards for the demographic variables of interest and, as such, a better understanding of the characteristics of populations served by the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS). The new standards have been formally adopted by the Secretary of HHS for application in all HHS-sponsored population health surveys involving self-reporting. The new data-collection standards will not only promote the uniform collection and utilization of demographic data, but also help the country shape future programs and policies to advance public health and to reduce disparities. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 35 is March 18, 2014. Please see for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Public Health 12/2013; · 3.27 Impact Factor