Basal Forebrain Activation Enhances Cortical Coding of Natural Scenes

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Nature Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 16.1). 10/2009; 12(11):1444-9. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2402
Source: PubMed


The nucleus basalis of the basal forebrain is an essential component of the neuromodulatory system controlling the behavioral state of an animal and it is thought to be important in regulating arousal and attention. However, the effect of nucleus basalis activation on sensory processing remains poorly understood. Using polytrode recording in rat visual cortex, we found that nucleus basalis stimulation caused prominent decorrelation between neurons and marked improvement in the reliability of neuronal responses to natural scenes. The decorrelation depended on local activation of cortical muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, whereas the increased reliability involved distributed neural circuits, as evidenced by nucleus basalis-induced changes in thalamic responses. Further analysis showed that the decorrelation and increased reliability improved cortical representation of natural stimuli in a complementary manner. Thus, the basal forebrain neuromodulatory circuit, which is known to be activated during aroused and attentive states, acts through both local and distributed mechanisms to improve sensory coding.

Download full-text


Available from: Yang Dan,
  • Source
    • "Whether these treatments are also capable to promote recovery from amblyopia is still unknown. A change in V1 E/I balance has also been achieved indirectly, pharmacologically targeting neuromodulators, such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and acetylcholine, which are known to be strongly involved in visual plasticity (Kasamatsu and Pettigrew, 1976; Bear and Singer, 1986; Kilgard and Merzenich, 1998; Bao et al., 2001; Goard and Dan, 2009) and which proved to impinge on E/I balance and to promote recovery from amblyopia (e.g., Maya Vetencourt et al., 2008; Bavelier et al., 2010; Morishita et al., 2010; Sale et al., 2014, for review) As an example, chronic delivery in the drinking water of the selective serotoninereuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine caused a marked decrease of GABAergic inhibition levels in V1 and this decrease was crucial for fluoxetine to enhance V1 experience-dependent plasticity "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Amblyopia is the most diffused form of visual function impairment affecting one eye, with a prevalence of 1–5% in the total world population. Amblyopia is usually caused by an early functional imbalance between the two eyes, deriving from anisometropia, strabismus, or congenital cataract, leading to severe deficits in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and stereopsis. While amblyopia can be efficiently treated in children, it becomes irreversible in adults, as a result of a dramatic decline in visual cortex plasticity which occurs at the end of the critical period (CP) in the primary visual cortex. Notwithstanding this widely accepted dogma, recent evidence in animal models and in human patients have started to challenge this view, revealing a previously unsuspected possibility to enhance plasticity in the adult visual system and to achieve substantial visual function recovery. Among the new proposed intervention strategies, non invasive procedures based on environmental enrichment, physical exercise or visual perceptual learning (vPL) appear particularly promising in terms of future applicability in the clinical setting. In this survey, we will review recent literature concerning the application of these behavioral intervention strategies to the treatment of amblyopia, with a focus on possible underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms.
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 10/2015; 9. DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00281 · 3.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Thus, the overlap of inputs from matrix-type dLGN, LM, AL, and RL in L1 may play a role in influencing responses in subsets of PCs by top-down inputs from ''where'' and ''what'' streams in task-specific fashion (Chen et al., 2013; Yamashita et al., 2013). This process may be modulated by activating M2 receptors, decorrelating visual responses and drive neurons to carry independent information (Vinje and Gallant, 2000; Goard and Dan, 2009). "

    Neuron 10/2015; · 15.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • ", 2013 ) , but also by modulating spontaneous activity and response variability ( Zinke et al . , 2006 ; Goard and Dan , 2009 ; Zhou et al . , 2011 ) . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neocortex is a layered sheet across which a basic organization is thought to widely apply. The variety of spontaneous activity patterns is similar throughout the cortex, consistent with the notion of a basic cortical organization. However, the basic organization is only an outline which needs adjustments and additions to account for the structural and functional diversity across cortical layers and areas. Such diversity suggests that spontaneous activity is spatially diverse in any particular behavioral state. Accordingly, this review summarizes the laminar and areal diversity in cortical activity during fixation and slow oscillations, and the effects of attention, anesthesia and plasticity on the cortical distribution of spontaneous activity. Among questions that remain open, characterizing the spatial diversity in spontaneous membrane potential may help elucidate how differences in circuitry among cortical regions supports their varied functions. More work is also needed to understand whether cortical spontaneous activity not only reflects cortical circuitry, but also contributes to determining the outcome of plasticity, so that it is itself a factor shaping the functional diversity of the cortex.
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits 09/2015; 9. DOI:10.3389/fncir.2015.00048 · 3.60 Impact Factor
Show more