Article

Structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for dimensional representations of DSM-IV anxiety disorders

Department of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Box 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo 3, Norway.
The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science (Impact Factor: 7.34). 10/2009; 195(4):301-7. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059485
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Twin data permit decomposition of comorbidity into genetically and environmentally derived correlations. No previous twin study includes all major forms of anxiety disorder.
To estimate the degree to which genetic and environmental risk factors are shared rather than unique to dimensionally scored panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Data obtained from 2801 young-adult Norwegian twins by means of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview were analysed with the Mx program.
A multivariate common factor model fitted best. The latent liability to all anxiety disorders was substantially more heritable (54%) than the individual disorders (23% to 40%). Most of the genetic effect was common to the disorders. Genes contributed just over 50% to the covariance between liabilities.
The five anxiety disorders all share genetic and environmental risk factors. This has implications for the revision of the anxiety disorder section in DSM-V.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael C Neale, Jul 08, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
129 Views
  • Source
    • "genetic factors contributing to individual differences in the personality trait neuroticism are variably shared with genetic liability for OCS dimensions. One prior twin study has reported shared genetic risk between OCS and other anxiety disorders [Tambs et al., 2009] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with obsessive compulsive disorder can display diverse and heterogeneous patterns of symptoms. Little is known about the relationship between obsessive-compulsive symptom (OCS) dimensions and normal personality traits, particularly those that increase risk for other internalizing disorders. In this study of 1,382 individuals from female–female twin pairs, we examined the relationship between self-report OCS dimensions derived from the Padua Inventory and Eysenck's personality traits neuroticism and extraversion. We conducted factor analysis to determine their phenotypic structure followed by twin analyses to determine their genetic and environmental sources of covariation. A three-factor solution, with dimensions corresponding to checking, aggressive obsessions, and contamination, was the best fit for the Padua OCS items. These dimensions were significantly and somewhat variably associated with neuroticism but negligibly associated with extraversion. The genetic correlations between neuroticism and these three OCS dimensions were moderate to high (0.66 with checking, 0.89 with aggressive obsessions, and 0.40 with contamination). However, the estimated genetic correlation between neuroticism and a unified latent OCS construct was smaller (0.32). Overall this study suggests that genetic, and to a smaller extent environmental, factors underlying neuroticism may act differentially as risk factors for OCS dimensions. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics 12/2014; 165(8). DOI:10.1002/ajmg.b.32269
  • Source
    • "For example, shared genetic variants have been shown to predispose to several types of major psychosis (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2013). Substantial and highly significant overlapping of the genetic factors affecting variation of several correlated phenotypes, as was observed in this and other studies (Williams et al., 2010), e.g., anxiety disorders (Tambs et al., 2009) and psychotic phenotypes mentioned above, may suggest the existence of an underlying common endophenotype. This has important consequences in both fundamental science , for example, in genome-wide association study design, and applied science, such as pharmacogenetic development of novel analgesics. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low back (LBP) and chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain (CWP) both have a significant genetic component and are associated with increased body mass index (BMI). We examined whether LBP and CWP share common genetic factors, and to what extent this correlation is modified by the genetic factors influencing BMI. Genetic analysis of binary traits such as pain is not simple, particularly if their risk is associated with age or other quantitative traits. Implementing Falconer's polygenic threshold concept for dichotomous traits inheritance, we developed new software to examine the extent of the genetic influence on LBP and CWP under age and BMI dependence. The analysis was conducted on 3266 and 2256 UK female twins, assessed for LBP and CWP, respectively. Analysis of the liability scores with threshold to LBP and CWP established substantial contribution of genetic factors to their variation (h(2) > 0.60, p<0.004-0.0003) and covariation (p=3.1E-08). Some 39% of the CWP and 70% of the LBP heritability estimates were attributable to genetic effects shared by both phenotypes, and 40% and 67% of the residual variation is caused by environmental factors simultaneously affecting both pain syndromes. However, contribution of BMI to variation/covariation of both pain phenotypes-although statistically highly significant (p∼10-7)-was not determinative.
    Annals of Human Genetics 06/2014; DOI:10.1111/ahg.12074
  • Source
    • "Several twin studies have identified common genetic factors underlying most anxiety disorders. [Hettema et al., 2005; Tambs et al., 2009] and multiple substance use disorders, respectively. [Kendler et al., 2007b]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the past century, the definition and classification of psychiatric disorders has evolved through a combination of historical trends, clinical observations, and empirical research. The current nosology, instantiated in the DSM-5 and ICD-10, rests on descriptive criteria agreed upon by a consensus of experts. While the development of explicit criteria has enhanced the reliability of diagnosis, the validity of the current diagnostic categories has been the subject of debate and controversy. Genetic studies have long been regarded as a key resource for validating the boundaries among diagnostic categories. Genetic epidemiologic studies have documented the familiality and heritability of clinically defined psychiatric disorders and molecular genetic studies have begun to identify specific susceptibility variants. At the same time, there is growing evidence from family, twin and genomic studies that genetic influences on psychiatric disorders transcend clinical boundaries. Here I review this evidence for cross-disorder genetic effects and discuss the implications of these findings for psychiatric nosology. Psychiatric genetic research can inform a bottom-up reappraisal of psychopathology that may help the field move beyond a purely descriptive classification and toward an etiology-based nosology. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics 10/2013; 162(7):559-78. DOI:10.1002/ajmg.b.32174