Article

Acute effect of environmental temperature during exercise on subsequent energy intake in active men

School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.92). 09/2009; 90(5):1215-21. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28162
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The performance of exercise while immersed in cold water has been shown to influence energy intake in the subsequent meal. However, the effect of ambient temperature during land-based exercise is not known.
Our aims were to investigate the effect of exercise performed in the heat on energy intake in the subsequent meal and to determine concentrations of circulating appetite-related hormones.
In a randomized, counterbalanced design, 11 active male participants completed 3 experimental trials in a fasted state: exercise in the heat (36 degrees C), exercise in a neutral temperature (25 degrees C), and a resting control (25 degrees C). The exercise trials consisted of treadmill running for 40 min at 70% VO(2peak). After each trial, participants were presented with a buffet-type breakfast of precisely known quantity and nutrient composition, which they could consume ad libitum.
Energy intake was greater after exercise in the neutral temperature compared with the control (P = 0.021) but was similar between exercise in the heat and the control and between the 2 exercise trials. When accounting for the excess energy expended during exercise, relative energy intake during exercise in the heat was lower than the control (P = 0.002) but was similar between exercise in the neutral temperature and the control and between exercise in the heat and in the neutral temperature. The lower relative energy intake after exercise in the heat was associated with an elevated tympanic temperature and circulating concentrations of peptide YY (P < 0.05).
Exercise in a neutral environmental temperature is associated with higher energy intake in the subsequent meal compared with a control, whereas exercise in the heat is not.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Karen E Wallman, Aug 21, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
150 Views
  • Source
    • "In particular, the effect of maternal exercise on appetite and energy intake has not previously been examined. Studies in nonpregnant populations have shown that an acute bout of exercise may influence feelings of hunger and fullness, the total amount of energy consumed, and the circulating levels of a number of appetite-related hormones in a direction that is favourable for achieving a short-term negative energy balance (Martins et al. 2007a; Shorten et al. 2009). Furthermore, regular aerobic exercise training has been shown to facilitate more sensitive eating behaviour in response to previous energy intake (Martins et al. 2007b), as well as increased feelings of fullness in both the fasted and postprandial state (Guelfi et al. 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effect of exercise on appetite and appetite-related hormones during pregnancy is not known. This study found that 30 min of moderate-intensity stationary cycling transiently attenuated hunger and increased fullness in late gestational women (n = 12). Exercise did not affect perceived appetite or appetite-related hormones in response to subsequent caloric consumption. These observations suggest that appetite responses do not intrinsically compensate for the additional energy expenditure induced by exercise, at least in the short term.
    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 11/2013; 38(11):1162-5. DOI:10.1139/apnm-2013-0060 · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This procedure has been shown to be reproducible in the measurement of energy intake (Arvaniti et al. 2000) and is considered the method of choice for quantifying the effect of an intervention on food intake (Stubbs et al. 1998). The foods were selected to reflect typical breakfast choices and were of varied macronutrient composition (i.e., cereal, milk, bread, condiments, fruit, juice, and baked beans; Crisp et al. 2012; Halse et al. 2011; Shorten et al. 2009). No time limit was imposed on the duration of the meal. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to identify the sprint frequency that when supplemented to continuous exercise at the intensity that maximises fat oxidation (Fat(max)), optimises energy expenditure, acute postexercise energy intake and enjoyment. Eleven overweight boys completed 30 min of either continuous cycling at Fat(max) (MOD), or sprint interval exercise that consisted of continuous cycling at Fat(max) interspersed with 4-s maximal sprints every 2 min (SI(120)), every 1 min (SI(60)), or every 30 s (SI(30)). Energy expenditure was assessed during exercise, after which participants completed a modified Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) followed by a buffet-type breakfast to measure acute postexercise energy intake. Energy expenditure increased with increasing sprint frequency (p < 0.001), but the difference between SI(60) and SI(30) did not reach significance (p = 0.076), likely as a result of decreased sprint quality as indicated by a significant decline in peak power output from SI(60) to SI(30) (p = 0.034). Postexercise energy intake was similar for MOD, SI(120), and SI(30) (p > 0.05), but was significantly less for SI(60) compared with MOD (p = 0.025). PACES was similar for MOD, SI(120), and SI(60) (p > 0.05), but was less for SI(30) compared with MOD (p = 0.038), SI(120) (p = 0.009), and SI(60) (p = 0.052). In conclusion, SI(60) appears optimal for overweight boys given that it maximises energy expenditure (i.e., there was no additional increase in expenditure with a further increase in sprint frequency) without prompting increased energy intake. This, coupled with the fact that enjoyment was not compromised, may have important implications for increased adherence and long-term energy balance.
    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 12/2012; 37(6):1222-31. DOI:10.1139/h2012-111 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "There are a number of possible explanations for the apparent lack of effect of the hormonal changes observed in the present study on subsequent energy intake. It is possible that the magnitude of such changes in the physiological levels of these hormones may be too small to directly influence subsequent energy intake, although other studies have reported alterations in energy intake with hormonal changes of a similar magnitude to that observed in the present study (Shorten et al. 2009). Alternatively , the hormonal changes may play a role in preventing an increase in energy intake to compensate for the exerciseinduced increase in energy expenditure, rather than inhibiting absolute intake. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research has shown that resistance and aerobic exercise have differing effects on perceived hunger and circulating levels of appetite-related hormones. However, the effect of resistance and aerobic exercise on actual energy intake has never been compared. This study investigated the effect of an acute bout of resistance exercise, compared with aerobic exercise, on subsequent energy intake and appetite-regulating hormones. Ten active men completed 3 trials in a counterbalanced design: 45 min of resistance exercise (RES; free and machine weights), aerobic exercise (AER; running), or a resting control trial (CON). Following exercise or CON, participants had access to a buffet-style array of breakfast foods and drinks to consume ad libitum. Plasma concentrations of a range of appetite-regulating hormones were measured throughout each trial. Despite significantly higher energy expenditure with AER compared with RES (p < 0.05), there was no difference in total energy intake from the postexercise meal between trials (p = 0.779). Pancreatic polypeptide was significantly higher prior to the meal after both RES and AER compared with CON. In contrast, active ghrelin was lower following RES compared with both CON and AER (p ≤ 0.05), while insulin was higher following RES compared with CON (p = 0.013). In summary, the differential response of appetite-regulating hormones to AER and RES does not appear to influence energy intake in the postexercise meal. However, given the greater energy expenditure associated with AER compared with RES, AER modes of exercise may be preferable for achieving short-term negative energy balance.
    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism 11/2011; 36(6):958-66. DOI:10.1139/h11-121 · 2.23 Impact Factor
Show more