Article

No assisted ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 24-hour neurological outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 09/2009; 38(1):254-60. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b42f6c
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the effect of no assisted ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation on neurologically intact survival compared with ten positive pressure ventilations/minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a pig model of cardiac arrest.
Prospective randomized animal study.
Animal laboratory.
Sixteen female intubated pigs (25.2 +/- 2.1 kg) anesthetized with propofol.
: fter 8 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, the intubated animals were randomized to 8 mins of continuous chest compressions (100/min) and either no assisted ventilation (n = 9) or 10 positive pressure ventilations/min (Smart Resuscitator Bag with 100% O2 flow at 10 L/min) (n = 7). The primary end point, neurologically intact 24-hr survival, was evaluated using a pig cerebral performance category score by a veterinarian blinded to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation method. MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS: During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, aortic and coronary perfusion pressure were similar between groups but cerebral perfusion pressure was significantly higher in the positive pressure ventilation group (33 +/- 15 vs. 14 +/- 14, p = .04). After 7.5 mins of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, arterial pO2 (mm Hg) and mixed venous O2 saturation (%) were significantly higher in the positive pressure ventilation compared with the no assisted ventilation group (117 +/- 29 and 41 +/- 21 vs. 40 +/- 24 and 10.8 +/- 7; p = .01 for both). Paco2 was significantly lower in the positive pressure ventilation group (48 +/- 10 vs. 77 +/- 26, p = .01). After 24 hrs, four of nine no assisted ventilation pigs were alive with a mean cerebral performance category score of 3 +/- 0 vs. five of seven alive and neurologically intact positive pressure ventilation pigs with a cerebral performance category score of 1 +/- 0.3 (p < .001 for cerebral performance category score).
No assisted ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation results in profound hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, and significantly worse 24-hr neurologic outcomes compared with positive pressure ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.

Full-text

Available from: Demetris Yannopoulos, Jun 12, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
151 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has a low survival rate to hospital discharge. Recent studies compared a simplified form of CPR, based on chest compression alone versus standard CPR including ventilation. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, focusing on survival at hospital discharge. We extensively searched the published literature on out-of hospital CPR for non traumatic cardiac arrest in different databases. We identified only three randomized trials on this topic, including witnessed and not-witnessed cardiac arrests. When pooling them together with a meta-analytic approach, we found that there is already clinical and statistical evidence to support the superiority of the compression-only CPR in terms of survival at hospital discharge, as 211/1842 (11.5%) patients in the chest compression alone group versus 178/1895 (9.4%) in the standard CPR group were alive at hospital discharge: odds ratio from both Peto and DerSimonian-Laird methods =0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.99), p for effect =0.04, p for heterogeneity =0.69, inconsistency =0%). Available evidence strongly support the superiority of bystander compression-only CPR. Reasons for the best efficacy of chest compression-only CPR include a better willingness to start CPR by bystanders, the low quality of mouth-to-mouth ventilation and a detrimental effect of too long interruptions of chest compressions during ventilation. Based on our findings, compression-only CPR should be recommended as the preferred CPR technique performed by untrained bystander.
    02/2010; 2(4):279-85.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RECOVER was created to optimize survival of small animal patients from cardiopulmonary arrest. Several findings from this study are applicable to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the neonatal foal. In particular, chest compressions should be a priority with no pauses and a "push hard, push fast" approach. The importance of ventilation is minimized with short, infrequent breaths at a rate of 10 to 20 per minute recommended.
    Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice 08/2014; 30(2). DOI:10.1016/j.cveq.2014.04.010 · 1.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: High quality chest compressions is the most significant factor related to improved short-term and long-term outcome in cardiac arrest. However, considerable controversy exists over the mechanisms involved in driving blood flow. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to elucidate major mechanisms involved in effective compression-mediated blood flow during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Design and setting: Systematic review of studies identified from the bibliographic databases of PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus. Selection criteria: All human and animal studies including information on the responsible mechanisms of compression-related blood flow. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers (MG, TX) independently screened all potentially relevant titles and abstracts for eligibility, by using a standardized data-worksheet. Main results: Forty seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Because of the heterogeneity in outcome measures, quantitative synthesis of evidence was not feasible. Evidence was critically synthesized in order to answer the review questions, taking into account study heterogeneity and validity. The number of included studies per category is as follows: blood flow during chest compression, nine studies; blood flow during chest decompression, six studies; effect of chest compression on cerebral blood flow, eight studies; active compression-decompression CPR, 14 studies; and effect of ventilation on compression-related blood flow, 13 studies. Conclusion: The evidence so far is inconclusive regarding the major responsible mechanism in compression-related blood flow. Although both ` cardiac pump' and ` thoracic pump' have a key role, the effect of each mechanism is highly depended on other resuscitation parameters, such as positive pressure ventilation and compression depth.
    Resuscitation 09/2014; 85(11). DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.032 · 3.96 Impact Factor