Lactobacillus reuteri ingestion and IK(Ca) channel blockade have similar effects on rat colon motility and myenteric neurones.

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Neurogastroenterology and Motility (Impact Factor: 3.42). 09/2009; 22(1):98-107, e33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01384.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We have previously shown that ingestion of Lactobacillus reuteri may modulate colonic enteric neuron activity but with unknown effects on colon motility. The aim of the present report was to elucidate the neuronal mechanisms of action of the probiotic by comparing the effects on motility of L. reuteri ingestion with blockade of a specific ionic current in enteric neurons.
We have used intraluminal pressure recordings from ex vivo rat colon segments and whole cell patch clamp recordings from neurons of rat longitudinal muscle myenteric plexus preparations to investigate the effects of L. reuteri and TRAM-34 on colon motility and neurophysiology. The effects of daily feeding of 10(9) L. reuteri bacteria or acute application of TRAM-34 on threshold fluid filling pressure or pulse pressure was measured.
Lactobacillus reuteri increased intraluminal fluid filling pressure thresholds for evoking pressure pulses by 51% from 0.47 +/- 0.17 hPa; the probiotic also decreased the pulse pressure amplitudes, but not frequency, by 18% from 3.91 +/- 0.52 hPa. The intermediate conductance calcium-dependent potassium (IK(Ca)) channel blocker TRAM-34 (3 micromol L(-1)) increased filling threshold pressure by 43% from 0.52 +/- 0.22 hPa and reduced pulse pressure amplitude by 40% from 2.63 +/- 1.11 hPa; contraction frequency was unaltered. TRAM-34 (3 micromol L(-1)) reduced membrane polarization, leak conductance and the slow afterhyperpolarization current in 16/16 myenteric rat colon AH cells but 19/19 S cells were unaffected.
The present results are consistent with L. reuteri enhancing tonic inhibition of colon contractile activity by acting via the IK(Ca) channel current in AH cells.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A complex set of interactions between the microbiome, gut and brain modulate responses to visceral pain. These interactions occur at the level of the gastrointestinal mucosa, and via local neural, endocrine or immune activity; as well as by the production of factors transported through the circulatory system, like bacterial metabolites or hormones. Various psychological, infectious and other stressors can disrupt this harmonious relationship and alter both the microbiome and visceral pain responses. There are critical sensitive periods that can impact visceral pain responses in adulthood. In this review we provide a brief background of the intestinal microbiome and emerging concepts of the bidirectional interactions between the microbiome, gut and brain. We also discuss recent work in animal models, and human clinical trials using prebiotics and probiotics that alter the microbiome with resultant alterations in visceral pain responses.
    Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility 04/2015; 21(2). DOI:10.5056/jnm15025 · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ingestion of a commensal bacteria, Lactobacillus rhamnosus JB-1, has potent immunoregulatory effects, and changes nerve-dependent colon migrating motor complexes (MMCs), enteric nerve function, and behavior. How these alterations occur is unknown. JB-1 microvesicles (MVs) are enriched for heat shock protein components such as chaperonin 60 heat-shock protein isolated from Escherichia coli (GroEL) and reproduce regulatory and neuronal effects in vitro and in vivo. Ingested labeled MVs were detected in murine Peyer’s patch (PP) dendritic cells (DCs) within 18 h. After 3 d, PP and mesenteric lymph node DCs assumed a regulatory phenotype and increased functional regulatory CD4+25+Foxp3+ T cells. JB-1, MVs, and GroEL similarly induced phenotypic change in cocultured DCs via multiple pathways including C-type lectin receptors specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3 grabbing non–integrin-related 1 and Dectin-1, as well as TLR-2 and -9. JB-1 and MVs also decreased the amplitude of neuronally dependent MMCs in an ex vivo model of peristalsis.Gut epithelial, but not direct neuronal application of, MVs, replicated functional effects of JB-1 on in situ patch-clamped enteric neurons. GroEL and anti–TLR-2 were without effect in this system, suggesting the importance of epithelium neuron signaling and discrimination between pathways for bacteria-neuron and -immune communication. Together these results offer a mechanistic explanation of howGram-positive commensals and probiotics may influence the host’s immune and nervous systems.
    The FASEB Journal 01/2015; 29(2). DOI:10.1096/fj.14-259721 · 5.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty one male Wistar albino rats each weighing approximately 280 g were used in this study. Animals were divided into three groups. The first group (n = 7) consisted of sham controls, in the second (n = 7), rats were administrated 0.1 g/1 ml/galactooligosaccharide by by oral gavage for 4 weeks. In the third group (n = 7), rats were administrated 10 9 CFU/1ml/day Bifidobacterium lactis by oral gavage for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, rats were sacrified; ileum and proximal colon segments were removed. The spontaneous contractions of ileum and proximal colon were evaluated by using organ bath. It has been detected that both prebiotics and probiotics increased intestinal motility. While probiotics have effects on both ileum and proximal colon, prebiotics seem to be effective in colon. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean). Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using general linear models of analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Turkey test.
    African journal of microbiology research 12/2011; 5(32). DOI:10.5897/AJMR11.801 · 0.54 Impact Factor


Available from
May 21, 2014