Longitudinal Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Antimanic Medication Use in Bipolar-I Disorder

Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts 02478, USA.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2009; 47(12):1217-28. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181adcc4f
Source: PubMed


To examine racial/ethnic longitudinal disparities in antimanic medication use among adults with bipolar-I disorder.
Observational study using administrative data from Florida's Medicaid program, July 1997 to June 2005, for enrollees diagnosed with bipolar-I disorder (N = 13,497 persons; 126,413 person-quarters). We examined the likelihood of receiving one of the following during a given quarter: (1) any antimanic agent (antipsychotic or mood stabilizer) or none, and (2) mood stabilizers, antipsychotic monotherapy, or neither. Binary and multinomial logistic regression models predicted the association between race/ethnicity and prescription fills, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. Cohort indicators for year that the enrollee met study criteria were included to account for cohort effects.
Averaging over all cohorts and quarters, compared with whites, blacks had lower odds of filling any antimanic and mood stabilizer prescriptions specifically (40%-49% and 47%-63%, respectively), but similar odds of filling prescriptions for antipsychotic monotherapy. After Bonferroni adjustment, compared with whites, there were no statistically significant disparities for Hispanics in filling prescriptions for any, or specific antimanic medications.
Rates of antimanic medication use were low regardless of race/ethnicity. However, we found disparities in antimanic medication use for blacks compared with whites and these disparities persisted over time. We found no Hispanic-white disparities. Quality improvement efforts should focus on all individuals with bipolar disorder, but particular attention should be paid to understanding disparities in medication use for blacks.

9 Reads
  • Source
    • "The same applies with regard to mood stabilizers. A recent survey found longitudinal differences in antimanic medication use for blacks compared with whites [22]. However, significant absence of previous studies investigating mood stabilizers' prescribing does not allow comparison and thus generalization of findings in this field. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No studies have been conducted in Greece with the aim of investigating the influence of ethnicity on the prescribing and treatment outcome of voluntarily admitted inpatients. Most studies conducted in the UK and the US, both on inpatients and outpatients, focus on the dosage of antipsychotics for schizophrenic patients and many suffer from significant methodological limitations. Using a simple design, we aimed to assess negative ethnic bias in psychotropic medication prescribing by comparing discrepancies in use between native and non-native psychiatric inpatients. We also aimed to compare differences in treatment outcome between the two groups. In this retrospective study, the prescribing of medication was compared between 90 Greek and 63 non-Greek inpatients which were consecutively admitted into the emergency department of a hospital covering Athens, the capital of Greece. Participants suferred from schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Overall, groups were compared with regard to 12 outcomes, six related to prescribing and six related to treatment outcome as assesed by standardised psychometric tools. No difference between the two ethnic groups was found in terms of improvement in treatment as measured by GAF and BPRS-E. Polypharmacy, use of first generation antipsychotics, second generation antipsychotics and use of mood stabilizers were not found to be associated with ethnicity. However, non-Greeks were less likely to receive SSRIs-SNRIs and more likely to receive benzodiazepines. Our study found limited evidence for ethnic bias. The stronger indication for racial bias was found in benzodiazepine prescribing. We discuss alternative explanations and give arguments calling for future research that will focus on disorders other than schizophrenia and studying non-inpatient populations.
    BMC Psychiatry 04/2011; 11(1):66. DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-11-66 · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rising drug costs have increased focus on how new pharmaceuticals diffuse into the marketplace. The case of gabapentin use in bipolar disorder provides an opportunity to study the roles of marketing, clinical evidence, and prior authorization (PA) policy on off-label medication use. Observational study using Medicaid administrative and Verispan marketing data. We examined the association between marketing, clinical trials, and prior authorization on gabapentin use. Florida Medicaid, bipolar disorder-diagnosed enrollees ages 18 to 64 for fiscal years 1994 to 2004. Gabapentin prescriptions increased from 8/1000 enrollees per quarter in 1994 to a peak of 387/1000 enrollees in 2002. Its uptake tracked marketing efforts towards psychiatrists. The publication of 2 negative clinical trials in 2000 and the discontinuation of marketing expenditures towards psychiatrists were associated with an end to the steep rise in gabapentin prescriptions. After these events gabapentin use remained between 319/1000 and 387/1000 enrollees per quarter until the PA policy, which was associated with a 45% decrease in prescriptions filled. After 1 year, scientific evidence and marketing discontinuation were associated with a 5.4 percentage point decrease in the predicted probability of filling a gabapentin prescription and the PA policy, a 7.1 percentage point decrease. Pharmaceutical marketing can influence off-label medication prescribing, particularly when pharmacologic options are limited. Evidence of inefficacy and/or the cessation of pharmaceutical marketing, and a restrictive formulary policy can alter prescriber behavior away from targeted pharmacologic treatments. These results suggest that both information and policy are important means in altering physician prescribing behavior.
    Medical care 02/2010; 48(4):372-9. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca404e · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This is an exploratory analysis of ambulatory and inpatient services utilization by older persons with type I bipolar disorder experiencing elevated mood. The association between type of treatment setting and the person's characteristics is explored within a framework that focuses upon predisposing, enhancing, and need characteristics. Baseline assessments were conducted with the first 51 inpatients and 49 outpatients 60 years of age and older, meeting criteria for type I bipolar disorder, manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode enrolled in the geriatric bipolar disorder study (GERI-BD) study. We compared participants recruited from inpatient versus outpatient settings in regard to the patients' predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics. Being treated in an inpatient rather than an outpatient setting was associated with the predisposing characteristic of being non-Hispanic caucasian (odds ratio [OR]: 0.1; P = .005) and past history of treatment with first-generation antipsychotics (OR: 6.5; P < .001), and the need characteristic reflected in having psychotic symptoms present in the current episode (OR: 126.08; P < .001). Ethnicity, past pharmacologic treatment, and current symptom severity are closely associated with treatment in inpatient settings. Clinicians and researchers should investigate whether closer monitoring of persons with well-validated predisposing and need characteristics can lead to their being treated in less costly but equally effective ambulatory rather than inpatient settings.
    Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 03/2012; 25(1):62-8. DOI:10.1177/0891988712436684 · 2.24 Impact Factor
Show more


9 Reads
Available from