Identification of an obese eating style in 4-year-old children born at high and low risk for obesity.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 4.39). 09/2009; 18(3):505-12. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.299
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study tested whether children's eating behavior and parental feeding prompts during a laboratory test meal differ among children born at high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) for obesity and are associated with excess child weight gain. At 4 years of age, 32 HR children (mean maternal prepregnancy BMI = 30.4 kg/m(2)) and 29 LR children (maternal BMI = 19.6 kg/m(2)) consumed a test meal in which their eating behavior was assessed, including rate of caloric consumption, mouthfuls/min, and requests for food. Parental prompts for the child to eat also were measured at year 4, and child body composition was measured at ages 4 and 6 years. T-tests, and logistic and multiple regression analyses tested study aims. Results indicated that HR and LR children did not differ in eating rate or parental feeding prompts. Greater maternal BMI, child mouthfuls of food/min, and total caloric intake/min during the test meal predicted an increased risk of being overweight or obese at age 6, whereas greater active mealtime was associated with a reduced risk of being overweight or obese. Regression analyses indicated that only mouthfuls of food/min predicted changes in BMI from 4 to 6 years, and mouthfuls of food/min and gender predicted 2-year changes in sum of skinfolds and total body fat. Thus, a rapid eating style, characterized by increased mouthfuls of food/min, may be a behavioral marker for the development of childhood obesity.

Download full-text


Available from: Reneé H Moore, Jul 28, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The modern world is rife with opportunities to overeat – yet not everyone becomes obese. This could be because individuals differ in appetite-related traits that manifest early in development and predict weight trajectories. What determines these traits? Parental feeding studies generally show that restrictive feeding is linked with heightened appetite, and pressure to eat with reduced appetite. But these relationships reflect parents responding to children as well as vice versa. In fact, twin studies argue that nature, rather than nurture, is the largest contributor to child appetite, and behavioral investigations of obesity-associated variants arising from genome-wide association studies confirm the contribution of genes to eating behavior. Little is known about biological contributions to appetitive traits in humans, or how genetic and environmental influences interact at a biological level to influence appetite. However a number of brain imaging studies have investigated responses to food cues and intake in adults, children, and groups at high familial and/or genetic obesity risk, and results are so far consistent with the possibility that functional and structural variation in networks subserving motivation and control is associated with appetite and obesity, and shows genetic influence. The emerging biobehavioral susceptibility model provides a useful, inclusive framework for explaining child and adult obesity. It also suggests that prevention and treatment strategies should acknowledge the powerful contribution of genetic and biological influences to eating behavior, and focus on stimulus control as well as novel interventions to modify appetitive tendencies.
    Appetite 10/2012; 59(2):622. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.048 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We live in a world replete with opportunities to overeat highly calorific, palatable foods - yet not everyone becomes obese. Why? We propose that individuals show differences in appetitive traits (e.g. food cue responsiveness, satiety sensitivity) that manifest early in life and predict their eating behaviours and weight trajectories. What determines these traits? Parental feeding restriction is associated with higher child adiposity, pressure to eat with lower adiposity, and both strategies with less healthy eating behaviours, while authoritative feeding styles coincide with more positive outcomes. But, on the whole, twin and family studies argue that nature has a greater influence than nurture on adiposity and eating behaviour, and behavioural investigations of genetic variants that are robustly associated with obesity (e.g. FTO) confirm that genes influence appetite. Meanwhile, a growing body of neuroimaging studies in adults, children and high risk populations suggests that structural and functional variation in brain networks associated with reward, emotion and control might also predict appetite and obesity, and show genetic influence. Together these different strands of evidence support a biobehavioural risk model of obesity development. Parental feeding recommendations should therefore acknowledge the powerful - but modifiable - contribution of genetic and neurological influences to children's eating behaviour.
    International Review of Psychiatry 06/2012; 24(3):189-99. DOI:10.3109/09540261.2012.676988 · 1.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a long-chain fatty acid essential for brain growth and cognitive development in infancy. There is some evidence that DHA can also influence growth in infancy and early childhood. Several clinical trials with infants and young children have found lower normalized growth following DHA increased exposure through maternal supplementation during pregnancy and/or lactation or infant formula supplementation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of feeding one of four concentrations of DHA in infant formula on weight-for-length percentile ( or =2 years) at twelve study visits from birth to four years of age. Healthy formula-fed infants were randomized to one of four infant formulas containing 0, 0.32, 0.64, or 0.96% of total fatty acid from DHA. Weight, length, and head circumference were measured at 6 weeks, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years, 2.5 years, 3 years, 3.5 years, and 4 years of age. Subjects were normalized to the Center for Disease Control weight-for-length ( or =2 years) by calculating percentiles. The relationship between weight-for-length and BMI-age percentiles across study visits and DHA concentration in the study formula were evaluated with a two way repeated measures ANOVA using a p-value of 0.05 as statistically significant. The concentration of DHA consumed through infant formula during the first year of life did not impact weight-for-length or BMI-age percentile from birth to 4 years of age (P =0.683). When grouped by DHA or no DHA there was no statistical significance (P =0.416). There is no observable difference in weight-for-length or BMI-age in infants supplemented DHA through infant formula in the first four years of life.