Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest

American Heart Association National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 09/2009; 38(1):101-8. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b43282
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the relationship of electrocardiographic rhythm during cardiac arrest with survival outcomes.
Prospective, observational study.
Total of 411 hospitals in the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Total of 51,919 adult patients with pulseless cardiac arrests from April 1999 to July 2005.
Registry data collected included first documented rhythm, patient demographics, pre-event data, event data, and survival and neurologic outcome data. Of 51,919 indexed cardiac arrests, first documented pulseless rhythm was ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 3810 (7%), ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 8718 (17%), pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in 19,262 (37%) and asystole 20,129 (39%). Subsequent VT/VF (that is, VT or VF occurring during resuscitation for PEA or asystole) occurred in 5154 (27%), with first documented rhythm of PEA and 4988 (25%) with asystole. Survival to hospital discharge rate was not different between those with first documented VF and VT (37% each, adjusted odds ratio [OR]) 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.23). Survival to hospital discharge was slightly more likely after PEA than asystole (12% vs. 11%, adjusted OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.00-1.18), Survival to discharge was substantially more likely after first documented VT/VF than PEA/asystole (adjusted OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.55-1.82). Survival to discharge was also more likely after PEA/asystole without subsequent VT/VF compared with PEA/asystole with subsequent VT/VF (14% vs. 7% for PEA without vs. with subsequent VT/VF; 12% vs. 8% for asystole without vs. with subsequent VT/VF; adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.44-1.80).
Survival to hospital discharge was substantially more likely when the first documented rhythm was shockable rather than nonshockable, and slightly more likely after PEA than asystole. Survival to hospital discharge was less likely following PEA/asystole with subsequent VT/VF compared to PEA/asystole without subsequent VT/VF.

Download full-text


Available from: Karl B Kern, Jul 08, 2014
  • Source
    • "In-hospital cardiac arrest occurs in 1 to 5 per 1000 patient admissions [4]. The American Heart Association's National Registry of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) indicate that survival to hospital discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest is 17.6% (for all rhythms) [5]. The initial rhythm is VF or pulseless-VT in 25% of cases and, of these, 37% leave the hospital alive. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiac arrest is defined as the sudden cessation of spontaneous ventilation and circulation. Within 15 seconds of cardiac arrest, the patient loses consciousness, electroencephalogram becomes flat after 30 seconds, pupils dilate fully after 60 seconds, and cerebral damage takes place within 90-300 seconds. It is essential to act immediately as irreversible damage can occur in a short time. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an attempt to restore spontaneous circulation through a broad range of interventions which are early defibrillation, high-quality and uninterrupted chest compressions, advanced airway interventions, and pharmacological interventions. Drugs should be considered only after initial shocks have been delivered (when indicated) and chest compressions and ventilation have been started. During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no specific drug therapy has been shown to improve survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest, and only few drugs have a proven benefit for short-term survival. This paper reviews current pharmacological treatment of cardiac arrest. There are three groups of drugs relevant to the management of cardiac arrest: vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, and other drugs such as sodium bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, atropine, fibrinolytic drugs, and corticosteroids.
    01/2012; 2012(2090-2840):815857. DOI:10.1155/2012/815857
  • Source
    • "There are about 450,000 cardiac arrests (CAs) that take place annually in the United States (Young, 2009). With advanced resuscitation techniques, only one-third achieve resumption of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and among those patients only one-third to one-half survive to hospital discharge (Meaney et al., 2010). Prolonged hypoxic–ischemic brain injury has been recognized as the main cause of high morbidity and mortality (Geocadin et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Impaired neural conductivity shown by delayed latency and reduced amplitude of characteristic peaks in somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), has been used to monitor hypoxic-ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest (CA). However, rather than characteristic peak deferral and suppression, the time jitter of the peak in SSEP related with time-variant neurological abnormalities is diminished by the commonly used ensemble average method. This paper utilizes the second order blind identification (SOBI) technique to extract characteristic peak information from one trial of SSEPs. Sixteen male Wistar rats were subjected to 7 or 9 min of asphyxial CA (n=8 per group). The SSEPs from median nerve stimulation were recorded for 4h after CA and then for 15 min periods at 24, 48 and 72 h. Neurological outcomes were evaluated by neurologic deficit score (NDS) at 72 h post-CA. The SSEP signal was analyzed offline with SOBI processing in Matlab. The N10 feature of SSEP was compared between good (NDS≥50) and bad (NDS<50) outcomes. After processed by SOBI, the N10 detection rate was significantly increased (p<0.001) from 90 min post-CA. Statistical difference of the latency variance of the N10 between good and bad outcome groups existed at 24, 48 and 72 h post-CA (p≤0.001). Our study is the first application using SOBI detecting variance in neural signals like SSEP. N10 latency variance, related with neurophysiological dysfunction, increased after hypoxic-ischemic injury. The SOBI technique is an efficient method in the identification of peak detection and offers a favorable alternative to reveal the neural transmission variation.
    Journal of neuroscience methods 08/2011; 201(2):355-60. DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.025 · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Notfall 11/2010; 13(7):559-620. DOI:10.1007/s10049-010-1370-3 · 0.32 Impact Factor
Show more