When can nuisance and invasive species control efforts backfire

Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Ecological Applications (Impact Factor: 4.09). 09/2009; 19(6):1585-95. DOI: 10.1890/08-1467.1
Source: PubMed


Population control through harvest has the potential to reduce the abundance of nuisance and invasive species. However, demographic structure and density-dependent processes can confound removal efforts and lead to undesirable consequences, such as overcompensation (an increase in abundance in response to harvest) and instability (population cycling or chaos). Recent empirical studies have demonstrated the potential for increased mortality (such as that caused by harvest) to lead to overcompensation and instability in plant, insect, and fish populations. We developed a general population model with juvenile and adult stages to help determine the conditions under which control harvest efforts can produce unintended outcomes. Analytical and simulation analyses of the model demonstrated that the potential for overcompensation as a result of harvest was significant for species with high fecundity, even when annual stage-specific survivorship values were fairly low. Population instability as a result of harvest occurred less frequently and was only possible with harvest strategies that targeted adults when both fecundity and adult survivorship were high. We considered these results in conjunction with current literature on nuisance and invasive species to propose general guidelines for assessing the risks associated with control harvest based on life history characteristics of target populations. Our results suggest that species with high per capita fecundity (over discrete breeding periods), short juvenile stages, and fairly constant survivorship rates are most likely to respond undesirably to harvest. It is difficult to determine the extent to which overcompensation and instability could occur during real-world removal efforts, and more empirical removal studies should be undertaken to evaluate population-level responses to control harvests. Nevertheless, our results identify key issues that have been seldom acknowledged and are potentially generic across taxa.

Download full-text


Available from: Elise F Zipkin, Feb 26, 2015
1 Follower
27 Reads
  • Source
    • "The system (31)-(32) with c 2,n = 0 has been studied in the literature; for instance, an autonomous version is discussed in [6] and [11]. The assumption c 2,n > 0, which adds greater interspecies competition into the stage-structured model, leads to theoretical issues that are not wellunderstood . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We study the dynamics of a second-order difference equation that is derived from a planar Ricker model of two-stage (e.g. adult, juvenile) biological populations. We obtain sufficient conditions for global convergence to zero in the non-autonomous case. This gives general conditions for extinction in the biological context. We also study the dynamics of an autonomous special case of the equation that generates multistable periodic and non-periodic orbits in the positive quadrant of the plane.
  • Source
    • "Classic examples of the first type occur in biological control efforts (Howarth 1991), where intentional introduction of a non-native species controls a target species, but also negatively impacts a TES species (see Doody et al. 2009; Smith 2005). Other examples within this group include species removals leading to predator or mesopredator release which negatively affects TES (Crooks and Soule 1999); or, where the harvest of an invasive species increases its population growth rate or stability (Zipkin et al. 2009), resulting in an indirect negative effect on a TES. An example of the second type of unintended consequence is the suite of management actions used to stabilize Africa lion populations which have had negative consequences for threatened cheetah populations (Chauvenet et al. 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resource managers are often presented with dilemmas that require immediate action to avoid species extinction, but that also ensure species long-term persistence. These objectives may conflict with one another, resulting in new threats as initial threats are ameliorated. Such threat evolution is a common pattern in the long history of efforts to conserve endemic trout (Salmonidae) populations in western North America. Early conservation strategies were often successful in reducing initial threats of hybridization with non-native trout, but were also responsible for producing new threats such as inbreeding, genetic drift, and, more generally, reductions in heterozygosity. In such situations, the objective of reducing or minimizing the threat of extinction remains the same, but the causes of decline change in direct response to the implemented strategy. This aspect of species recovery is not often recognized in initial efforts to protect a species from extinction. Here, we present the case of the threatened Little Kern golden trout (O. mykiss whitei), as an example of threat evolution. Its conservation management history is well documented, as are feedbacks between direct conservation actions and emerging present-day threats. Management of this and similarly imperiled species must take into account evolving threats, if long-term persistence is to occur.
    Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 09/2015; 25(3). DOI:10.1007/s11160-015-9394-x · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Marine invertebrates provide interesting models to study the genetics of invasion biology because they can spread rapidly due to their high fecundities and lifestages that allow for long range dispersal (Gilg et al. 2010). High fecundity is a characteristic trait of successful invasive species, allowing the invader to overcome diminished population sizes (Kolar and Lodge 2001; Zipkin et al. 2009). In addition, the ability to disperse over long distances is often understudied with regard to the spread of invasive species across the globe (Suarez et al. 2001; Gaylord et al. 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to investigate the phylogeny, invasion history and genetic structure of the global invader Megabalanus coccopoma. First, we created a Bayesian phylogeny using cytochrome oxidase I and 16S mitochondrial genes of samples we collected and sequences available on GenBank for all species in the genus Megabalanus. Second, we compared the genetic differences within and between native and invasive populations verified as M. coccopoma by constructing a haplotype network of the COI sequences and estimating gene diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (π). Finally, we ran an analysis of molecular variance and calculated pairwise ΦST to evaluate the similarity among populations. We identified several lineages that correspond to putatively different species of Megabalanus and uncovered nomenclature discrepancies among GenBank samples and undocumented lineages from our own collections. However, we found that the majority of samples were indeed M. coccopoma. Among populations of M. coccopoma, levels of within-population genetic diversity were not significantly different (ph = 0.131, pπ = 0.129) between native (h = 0.970, π = 0.00708) and non-native populations (h = 0.950, π = 0.00605) and analysis of molecular variance analyses revealed that 98.34 % of the genetic variation was partitioned within populations with a significant global ΦST = 0.017. Our results revealed that invasions in at least the southeastern United States and Brazil are composed of multiple lineages; however, we found that most of the global invasion occurred from a single lineage, M. coccopoma, and that no significant genetic differentiation exists between native and non-native populations of this species.
    Biological Invasions 08/2014; 16(8). DOI:10.1007/s10530-013-0624-7 · 2.59 Impact Factor
Show more