Article
The future of robotics in hand surgery.
Unité SOS Mains, Centre de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de la Main, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 10 Avenue Achille-Baumann, 67403 Illkirch Cedex, France.
Chirurgie de la Main (impact factor:
0.53).
08/2009;
28(5):278-85.
DOI:10.1016/j.main.2009.08.002
pp.278-85
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM FOR PERIPHERAL NERVEREPAIR IN THE UPPER EXTREMITY
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: So far, predictive models with individualized estimates of prognosis for patients with peripheral nerve injuries are lacking. Our group has previously shown the prognostic value of a standardized scoring system by examining the functional outcome after acute, sharp complete laceration and repair of median and/or ulnar nerves at various levels in the forearm. In the present study, we further explore the potential mathematical model in order to devise an effective prognostic scoring system. We retrospectively collected medical record data of 73 cases with a peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity in order to estimate which patients would return to work, and what time was necessary to return to the pre-injury work. Postoperative assessment followed the protocol described by Rose´n and Lundborg. We found that return to pre-injury work can be predicted with high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (95%) using the total numerical score of the Rose´n and Lundborg protocol at the third follow-up interval (TS3) as well as the difference between the TS3 and the total score at second follow-up interval (TS2). In addition, the factors age and type of injured nerve (median, ulnar, or combined) can determine the time of return to work based on a mathematical model. This prognostic protocol can be a useful tool to provide information about the functional and social prospects of the patients with these types of injuries. VVC 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 00:000–000, 2012.Microsurgery 01/2012; J_ID: CRO Customer A_ID: 11-0248.R4 Cadmus Art: MICR22000 Date: 25-APRIL-12 Stage: I Page: 1(J_ID: CRO Customer A_ID: 11-0248.R4 Cadmus Art: MICR22000 Date: 25-APRIL-12 Stage: I Page: 1-J_ID: CRO Customer A_ID: 11-0248.R4 Cadmus Art: MICR22000 Date: 25-APRIL-12 Stage: I Page: 1):1. · 1.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Prognostic scoring system for peripheral nerve repair in the upper extremity.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: So far, predictive models with individualized estimates of prognosis for patients with peripheral nerve injuries are lacking. Our group has previously shown the prognostic value of a standardized scoring system by examining the functional outcome after acute, sharp complete laceration and repair of median and/or ulnar nerves at various levels in the forearm. In the present study, we further explore the potential mathematical model in order to devise an effective prognostic scoring system. We retrospectively collected medical record data of 73 cases with a peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity in order to estimate which patients would return to work, and what time was necessary to return to the pre-injury work. Postoperative assessment followed the protocol described by Rosén and Lundborg. We found that return to pre-injury work can be predicted with high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (95%) using the total numerical score of the Rosén and Lundborg protocol at the third follow-up interval (TS3) as well as the difference between the TS3 and the total score at second follow-up interval (TS2). In addition, the factors age and type of injured nerve (median, ulnar, or combined) can determine the time of return to work based on a mathematical model. This prognostic protocol can be a useful tool to provide information about the functional and social prospects of the patients with these types of injuries. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 2012.Microsurgery 06/2012; · 1.61 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
bone tissue
fluoroscopic navigation
great technical
Hand surgery
last decade
movement demultiplication
nervous sutures
numerous works
orthopaedic surgery
passive robots
percutaneous screwing
plastic surgery
potential clinical applications
remote-controlled surgery
robotic technology
scaphoid bone
soft tissues
suppressing physiological tremor thanks
surgical fields
surgical motion