Osseous Remodeling After Femoral Head-neck Junction Osteochondroplasty

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Suite 11300 West Pavilion, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.77). 09/2009; 468(2):511-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1098-x
Source: PubMed


Femoral head-neck junction osteochondroplasty is commonly used to treat femoroacetabular impingement, yet remodeling of the osteochondroplasty site is not well described. We therefore describe bony remodeling at the osteochondroplasty site and analyze clinical outcomes and complications associated with femoral osteochondroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed 135 patients (150 hips) who underwent femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty combined with hip arthroscopy, surgical hip dislocation, periacetabular osteotomy, or proximal femoral osteotomy. The minimum clinical followup was 10 months (mean, 22.3 months; range, 10-65 months). We assessed the femoral-head neck offset, head-neck offset ratio, alpha angle, and cortical remodeling. We used the Harris hip score to determine hip function. We observed an increase in the head-neck offset, offset ratio, and decrease in the alpha angle postoperatively and at latest followup. Ninety-eight of 113 (87%) hips had partial or complete recorticalization at the osteochondroplasty site. The mean Harris hip score improved from 64 to 85. We excised heterotopic bone in one hip. There were no femoral neck fractures. The deformity correction achieved with femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty is maintained and recorticalization occurs in the majority of cases during the first two years. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text


Available from: Gail Pashos, Apr 18, 2014
21 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present computable, guaranteed error bounds for controllable subspaces and uncontrollable modes, unobservable subspaces and unobservable modes, supremal (A,C) invariant subspaces in ker D, supremal (A,C) controllable subspaces in ker D, the uncontrollable modes within the supremal (A,C) invariant subspace in ker D, and invariant zeroes. In particular our bounds apply in the nongeneric case when the solutions are ill-posed. We do this by showing that all these features are eigenspaces and eigenvalues of certain singular matrix pencils, and then applying a perturbation theory for general singular matrix pencils. Numerical examples are included.
    Decision and Control, 1986 25th IEEE Conference on; 01/1987
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mechanical hip pain typically has been associated either with dynamic factors resulting in abnormal stress and contact between the femoral head and acetabular rim when the hip is in motion or with static overload stresses related to insufficient congruency between the head and acetabular socket in the axially loaded (standing) position. Compensatory motion may adversely affect the dynamic muscle forces in the pelvic region, leading to further strain and pain. Hip pain related to static overload stresses may also be localized to the anteromedial groin, but compensatory dysfunction of the periarticular musculature may lead to muscular fatigue and associated pain throughout the hip. As our understanding of hip joint mechanics has advanced, it has become increasingly apparent that hip pain in the absence of osteoarthritis may be due to a complex combination of mechanical stresses, both dynamic and static. With an emphasis on findings in the recent literature, this review will describe the dynamic and static factors associated with mechanical hip pain, the combinations of dynamic and static stresses that are commonly identified in hip pain, and common patterns of compensatory injury in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
    Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 10/2010; 27(2):235-51. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.022 · 3.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arthroscopy is increasingly used to improve pain and function in athletes with hip joint pathology. Surgical techniques have evolved to utilise arthroscopic femoral osteoplasty to address potential morphological contributors to pathology. Investigate pain and function outcomes following hip arthroscopy with and without femoral osteoplasty in individuals with intra-articular hip pathology. Systematic review. A comprehensive search strategy identified studies that evaluated the outcome over at least 3 months following arthroscopy for intra-articular hip pathology, using patient-reported outcomes of pain and/or function. Methodological quality was evaluated (Downs and Black scale), and effect sizes calculated when sufficient data were available. Twenty-nine studies of moderate methodological quality were included. Of 16 studies investigating arthroscopy alone, two studies showed large effects (3.12-5.46) at 1-2 years. Pain reduction and functional improvement (median 47%) were consistently reported by the remaining 14 studies up to 10 years postsurgery. Of 15 studies investigating arthroscopy with osteoplasty, nine papers showed mostly large effects (0.78-2.93) over 6-28 months. Adverse events were minimal (7% of participants, 12 studies, predominantly transient neuropraxia (83%)). Current evidence indicates that hip arthroscopy can significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with intra-articular hip pathology. While benefits of arthroscopy alone can persist up to 10 years postsurgery, effects of osteoplasty beyond 3 years need to be established. Future studies should investigate rehabilitation in this population, and the impact of surgery on development of osteoarthritis.
    British Journal of Sports Medicine 12/2011; 46(9):632-43. DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090428 · 5.03 Impact Factor
Show more