Article

Disturbance Alters the Phylogenetic Composition and Structure of Plant Communities in an Old Field System

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 09/2009; 4(9):e7071. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007071
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The changes in phylogenetic composition and structure of communities during succession following disturbance can give us insights into the forces that are shaping communities over time. In abandoned agricultural fields, community composition changes rapidly when a field is plowed, and is thought to reflect a relaxation of competition due to the elimination of dominant species which take time to re-establish. Competition can drive phylogenetic overdispersion, due to phylogenetic conservation of 'niche' traits that allow species to partition resources. Therefore, undisturbed old field communities should exhibit higher phylogenetic dispersion than recently disturbed systems, which should be relatively 'clustered' with respect to phylogenetic relationships. Several measures of phylogenetic structure between plant communities were measured in recently plowed areas and nearby 'undisturbed' sites. There was no difference in the absolute values of these measures between disturbed and 'undisturbed' sites. However, there was a difference in the 'expected' phylogenetic structure between habitats, leading to significantly lower than expected phylogenetic diversity in disturbed plots, and no difference from random expectation in 'undisturbed' plots. This suggests that plant species characteristic of each habitat are fairly evenly distributed on the shared species pool phylogeny, but that once the initial sorting of species into the two habitat types has occurred, the processes operating on them affect each habitat differently. These results were consistent with an analysis of correlation between phylogenetic distance and co-occurrence indices of species pairs in the two habitat types. This study supports the notion that disturbed plots are more clustered than expected, rather than 'undisturbed' plots being more overdispersed, suggesting that disturbed plant communities are being more strongly influenced by environmental filtering of conserved niche traits.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
83 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and aims Understanding the role of resource availability in structuring biotic communities is of importance in community ecology. This study investigates how light and soil nutrient availability drive assemblages of both plants and their root-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Methods We conducted a 4-year light [full light or shade] and soil fertility [unfertilized or fertilized with (NH4)2HPO4] interactive manipulations in an alpine meadow ecosystem. Species and phylogenetic compositions of plant and AMF communities were simultaneously measured, and the primary ecological processes structuring both communities were inferred from the community phylogenetic analysis. Results Reducing light and/or increasing soil fertility significantly reduced species richness and changed community compositions of both plant and AMF. Plant community phylogenetic structure shifted from random in untreated control to overdispersion in other treatments, whereas AMF communities were phylogenetically clustered and random in unfertilized and fertilized plots, respectively. These results suggest that plant communities in treated plots were mainly determined by competitive exclusion, and that AMF communities in unfertilized and fertilized plots were determined by environmental filtering and random process, respectively. Conclusions We observed strong effects of light and soil nutrient availability on both plant and AMF communities, and our findings highlight that the primary ecological processes that drive plant and AMF assemblages should be highly dependent on the level of resource availability.
    Plant and Soil 09/2014; 386(1-2). DOI:10.1007/s11104-014-2261-z · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Succession has been a focal point of ecological research for over a century, but thus far has been poorly explored through the lens of modern phylogenetic and trait-based approaches to community assembly. The vast majority of studies conducted to date have comprised static analyses where communities are observed at a single snapshot in time. Long-term datasets present a vantage point to compare established and emerging theoretical predictions on the phylogenetic and functional trajectory of communities through succession. We investigated within, and between, community measures of phylogenetic and functional diversity in a fire-prone heathland along a 21 year time series. Contrary to widely held expectations that increased competition through succession should inhibit the coexistence of species with high niche overlap, plots became more phylogenetically and functionally clustered with time since fire. There were significant directional shifts in individual traits through time indicating deterministic successional processes associated with changing abiotic and/or biotic conditions. However, relative to the observed temporal rate of taxonomic turnover, both phylogenetic and functional turnover were comparatively low, suggesting a degree of functional redundancy among close relatives. These results contribute to an emerging body of evidence indicating that limits to the similarity of coexisting species are rarely observed at fine spatial scales.
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 12/2014; 281(1797). DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.2102 · 5.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Habitat conversion is the primary driver of biodiversity loss, yet little is known about how it is restructuring the tree of life by favoring some lineages over others. We combined a complete avian phylogeny with 12 years of Costa Rican bird surveys (118,127 detections across 487 species) sampled in three land uses: forest reserves, diversified agricultural systems, and intensive monocultures. Diversified agricultural systems supported 600 million more years of evolutionary history than intensive monocultures but 300 million fewer years than forests. Compared with species with many extant relatives, evolutionarily distinct species were extirpated at higher rates in both diversified and intensive agricultural systems. Forests are therefore essential for maintaining diversity across the tree of life, but diversified agricultural systems may help buffer against extreme loss of phylogenetic diversity.
    Science 09/2014; 345(6202):1343-6. DOI:10.1126/science.1254610 · 31.48 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
1 Download
Available from