Article

The Need for Individualization in Neurofeedback: Heterogeneity in QEEG Patterns Associated with Diagnoses and Symptoms

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2119, USA.
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback (Impact Factor: 1.13). 09/2009; 35(1):31-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-009-9106-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Very diverse assessment procedures are utilized by neurofeedback practitioners, many of which are not based on careful examination of raw EEG data followed by scientifically objective quantitative EEG (QEEG) database comparisons. Research is reviewed demonstrating the great heterogeneity in the EEG patterns associated with various diagnoses and symptoms. The fact that most patients qualify for dual diagnoses, with co-morbid psychiatric and medical conditions present, complicates the ability of clinicians to estimate what electrophysiological patterns may be associated with symptoms. In such cases treatment planning is characterized by a great deal of guesswork and experimentation. Peer reviewed publications have documented that neurofeedback treatment can sometimes be associated with both transient side effects as well as more serious negative effects. It is believed that the lack of comprehensive and objective assessment of brain functioning may increase the risk of neurofeedback either being ineffective or causing iatrogenic harm. QEEG provides reliable, non-invasive, objective, culture-free and relatively low cost evaluation of brain functioning, permitting individualization of treatment and added liability protection.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: D. Corydon Hammond, Feb 24, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
97 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic pain, usually refractory to analgesics, is a significant problem for many individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Preliminary studies suggest that electroencephalography (EEG) biofeedback (also known as neurofeedback, NF) has the potential to help patients with otherwise refractory chronic pain. However, there remain many unanswered questions about the effects and mechanisms of this treatment. We studied 13 individuals with SCI and chronic pain with NF. Ten of the 13 individuals completed 4 sessions each of three different neurofeedback protocols assigned in random order for a total of 12 NF sessions. All three protocols had similar immediate effects on pain intensity. In addition, the participants reported modest pre- to post-treatment decreases in worst pain and pain unpleasantness following completion of the 12 NF sessions. These improvements were maintained at 3-month follow-up. The majority of the participants felt they benefited from and were satisfied with the treatment. No significant effects on measures of other outcome domains (sleep quality, pain interference and fatigue) were observed, although there was a non-significant trend for an increase in fatigue. Finally, pre- to post-treatment changes in EEG bandwidth activity, consistent with the training protocols, were observed in θ and α but not β frequencies. The findings provide preliminary support for the potential efficacy of NF for the treatment of SCI-related pain, and suggest that further clinical studies are warranted.
    Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 03/2013; 38(2). DOI:10.1007/s10484-013-9214-9 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El procedimiento de biofeeback conductual está basado en el condicionamiento operante, mediante el cual una persona recibe información sobre sus procesos biológicos involuntarios y aprende a ejercer cierto grado de control cerebral sobre ellos. Suelen utilizarse parámetros fisiológicos como la temperatura o conductancia de piel, el tono muscular o la respiración. Son muy numerosos los estudios clínicos controlados en los que el biofeedback ha mostrado su eficacia en diversos desórdenes orgánicos o comportamentales. Más recientemente se ha empezado a utilizar una clase más sofisticada: el neurofeedback electroencefalográfico, que se basa en el registro y en el análisis automático de la actividad eléctrica del cerebro. Utilizando las señales directamente provenientes del Sistema Nervioso Central, se caracteriza por un rango de acción más amplio, permitiendo, además, captar algunos correlatos de las funciones cognitivas superiores. Los parámetros representan algunos de los principales procesos que, por lo general, permanecen inconscientes y escapan al control racional. Lo que se pretende es que, mostrando la información registrada al propio individuo, éste aprenda a ejercer un control sobre ellos, optimizando el funcionamiento cerebral y el del resto de organismo. Contamos con cierto número de estudios que han aplicado el neurofeedback en el tratamiento de sujetos adictos, y los resultados apuntan a una considerable utilidad de estas técnicas, no sólo frente al propio proceso adictivo, sino a alteraciones psicopatológicas frecuentemente asociadas, como la depresión y el déficit de atención. Se precisan estudios econométricos para efectuar estudios de coste/beneficio en comparación con técnicas clásicas.
    Neurociencia y Adicción, Edited by Eduardo J. Pedrero Pérez, 09/2011: chapter 6: pages 351-358; Sociedad Española de Toxicomanías SET., ISBN: 978-84-615-0572-2
  • Holistic nursing practice 27(4):246-50. DOI:10.1097/HNP.0b013e3182971b7c · 0.52 Impact Factor