Health Information Quality on the Internet in Urological Oncology: A Multilingual Longitudinal Evaluation

Division of Urology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Urology (Impact Factor: 2.13). 09/2009; 74(5):1058-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.091
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the quality of uro-oncological Web sites, to assess for language or disease differences across Western languages, and to perform a longitudinal comparison between 2004 and 2009. Uro-oncological Internet information quality is considered variable but no comprehensive analysis exists.
Health on the Net (HON) principles may be applied to Web sites using an automated toolbar function. Using the Google search engine (, in 2004 and 2009, 2400 Web sites were assessed using the keywords prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancer in English, French, German, and Spanish. The first 150 Web sites in each language had HON principles measured-a comparison between 2004 and 2009 was done. A further analysis of site sponsorship was undertaken.
Regardless of language or cancer type, most sites are not HON accredited. English has consistently more than English, French, Spanish, or German. For the respective languages in 2009, prostate has the most (29, 14%, 16%, 12%), followed by bladder (29%, 22%, 14%, 13%), kidney (25%, 15%, 10%, 13%), and testis (26%, 19%, 7.11%). Significant differences were found comparing language and organ groups. The quality improved from 2004 to 2009. Nonprofit organizations (51%), government and/or educational (39%), commercial (20%), with urologists last (14%) were accredited.
A lack of validation of most uro-oncological sites should be appreciated by urologists. Additionally, there is a discrepancy in quality and number of Web sites across uro-oncological diseases and major Western European languages, but with some improvement seen recently. We need to encourage informative, ethical, and reliable complimentary health Web sites on the Internet and direct patients to them.

Download full-text


Available from: Nathan Lawrentschuk, Sep 02, 2015
  • Source
    • "e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / p a t e d u c o u (HON) Foundation criteria [48] [49] and the EC 'Quality Criteria for Health-Related Websites' [50] [51]. These tools evaluate websites on criteria including transparency of authorship and the website's advertising policy. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To evaluate commonly-used cancer websites’ information provision, we developed and applied an Information Comprehensiveness Tool to breast and prostate cancer websites. Methods We first collated questions from a systematic literature review on patient information needs. We then classified the questions in terms of spectrum of care, theme, and nature of question. “Breast cancer” and “prostate cancer” were typed into Google, and websites listed on the first page of results were selected. Two researchers, blind to each others’ scores, assessed the same websites using the coding system. Each question was scored on a 3-point scale as not (0%), partially (50%) and fully (100%) answered by two researchers. Average scores were calculated across all questions. Inter-rater reliability was assessed. Results We identified 79 general, 5 breast, and 5 prostate cancer questions. Inter-rater reliability was good, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.756 (95% CIs 0.729-0.781). 17 questions were not answered thoroughly by any website. Questions about “future planning”, “monitoring”, and “decision-making” were discussed least. Biomedical questions scored highest. Conclusions More comprehensive information needs to be provided on breast and prostate cancer websites. Practice Implications: This ICT can improve cancer information online and enable patients to engage more actively regarding their information needs.
    Patient Education and Counseling 01/2013; 95(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.013 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Manual Therapy xxx (2012) 1e7 Please cite this article in press as: Hendrick PA, et al., Acute low back pain information online: An evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites, Manual Therapy (2012), doi:10.1016/j.math.2012.02.019 growth in the internet during the past decade and increasing access to evidence-based guidelines, there is a timely need for a review of internet sites that provide information online for the management of ALBP. It is agreed that health information needs to be current, accurate , evidence-based, and unambiguous in order to provide the end user with the most valid and reliable information (Lawrentschuk et al., 2009). Accuracy in health information is especially important for globally prevalent conditions such as ALBP, where specific information available to the public is important to promote effective self-management strategies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The internet is increasingly being used as a source of health information by the general public. Numerous websites exist that provide advice and information on the diagnosis and management of acute low back pain (ALBP), however, the accuracy and utility of this information has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to establish the quality, content and readability of online information relating to the treatment and management of ALBP. The internet was systematically searched using Google search engines from six major English-speaking countries. In addition, relevant national and international low back pain-related professional organisations were also searched. A total of 22 relevant websites was identified. The accuracy of the content of the ALBP information was established using a 13 point guide developed from international guidelines. Website quality was evaluated using the HONcode, and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade level (FKGL) was used to establish readability. The majority of websites lacked accurate information, resulting in an overall mean content accuracy score of 6.3/17. Only 3 websites had a high content accuracy score (>14/17) along with an acceptable readability score (FKGL 6-8) with the majority of websites providing information which exceeded the recommended level for the average person to comprehend. The most accurately reported category was, "Education and reassurance" (98%) while information regarding "manipulation" (50%), "massage" (9%) and "exercise" (0%) were amongst the lowest scoring categories. These results demonstrate the need for more accurate and readable internet-based ALBP information specifically centred on evidence-based guidelines.
    Manual therapy 03/2012; 17(4):318-24. DOI:10.1016/j.math.2012.02.019 · 1.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metformin has shown promise for cancer prevention. Prior studies suggested that metformin might interact potential prostate cancer (PCa) prevention agents: finasteride and statins. This study assessed if concurrent use of statins or finasteride modified the long-term impact of metformin on PCa risk in men with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The study cohort consisted of 71,999 men with T2DM seen in the Veteran Administration Health Care System, without prior cancer or liver diseases, nor prescription of thiazolidinediones or insulin between FY2003-FY2013. Cox proportional hazard analyses (adjusting for covariates and propensity scores of metformin use) were conducted to compare the hazard ratio (HR) of PCa associated with metformin use between statins or finasteride users and none users. Mean follow-up was 6.4±2.8 years; 5.2% (N= 3,756) of the cohort subsequently received a PCa diagnosis. Both statins and finasteride significantly modified the impact of metformin on PCa incidence (p-value<0.001): HR's of PCa associated with metformin use were 0.89 (p-value=0.02) among non-statin/non-finasteride users, 0.73 (p-value<0.001) among statin users, and 1.42 (p-value<0.001) among finasteride users. Metformin was associated with reduced PCa risk in men with T2DM. This impact was enhanced by statins but reversed by finasteride. Metformin, statins, and finasteride are potential PCa prevention agents. The interaction of these drugs on PCa risk needs further confirmation in other cohorts. Our finding of differential impacts of metformin, statins, and finasteride (alone or in combination) on PCa risk is informative for treatment management in men at risk for PCa and T2DM.
Show more